Measurement Efficiency of Entrepreneurial Universities by Using Mathematical Programming (DEA) Approach

Authors

  • Amir Hosein Moradi Deluyi Faculty of Management and Human Recourse, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Fatemeh Rashed Faculty of Education, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Saudah Sofian Faculty of Management and Human Recourse, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Khadijah Daud Faculty of Education, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v69.3236

Keywords:

Entrepreneurial orientation, data envelopment analysis, efficiency, entrepreneurial university, organizational structure

Abstract

Entrepreneurship orientation (EO) approach provides universities with a plan and roadmap for getting over rising uncertainty and complexity. Inspiring universities to embrace transformation and innovation, risk taking and proactive policy for planning and executing development strategies for success in the dynamic competitive environment arise from entrepreneurship orientation spirit. To reach this status, the key factors of success in entrepreneurship should be taken into consideration and assessed in universities. Structural and entrepreneurial policies as key non-financial factors are two concepts that have received considerable attention over the past years. Measuring efficiency of universities by the mentioned factors and using mathematical programming like Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) method is the aim of this study. Hence, this paper applied DEA method for measuring efficiency of 16 faculties and institutes in Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (FUM) in Iran. Descriptive-survey methodology was used and data were collected through questionnaire survey. The faculties and institutes were ranked based on structural policies and EO through DEA. Finally, the DEA method recommended the development roadmaps template for the 11 faculties and institutes which were inefficient.

References

Etzkowitz, H. 2013. Anatomy of the Entrepreneurial University. Social Science Information. 52(3): 486–511.

Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhart, C., and Terra, B. R. C., 2000. The Future of the University and the University of the Future: Evolution of Ivory Tower to Entreprenenurial Paradigm. Research Policy. 29(2): 313–330.

Kirby, D., 2003. Entrepreneurship. Maidenhead: Mcgraw-Hill.

Wong, P., Ho, Y., and Singh, A., 2007. Towards an ‘Entrepreneurial University’ Model to Support Knowledge-based Economic Development: The Case of The National University of Singapore. World Development. 35(6): 941–958.

Guerrero, M., Urbano, D. 2012. The Development of an Entrepreneurial University. The Journal of Technology Transfer. 37(1): 43–74.

Nelles, J., Vorley, T., 2010. Constructing an Entrepreneurial Architecture: An Emergent Framework for Studying the Contemporary University Beyond the Entrepreneurial Turn. Innovative Higher Education. 35(3): 161–176.

Araghi, Mojtaba. 2008. Revising the Organizational Structure in Companies. The Automotive Industry Journals. 40.

Sporn, B., 2001. Building Adaptive Universities: Emerging Organizational Forms Based on Experiences of European and US Universities. Tertiary Education and Management. 7(2): 121–134.

Mok, K. 2005. Fostering Entrepreneurship: Changing Role of Government and Higher Education Governance In Hong Kong. Research Policy. 34(4): 537–554.

Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M. and Tone, K. 2007. Data Envelopment Analysis. A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References, and Dea-Solver Software. Second ed. New York: Springer.

Banker, R. D., Charnes, A. and Cooper, W. W. 1984. Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Efficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science. 30(9): 1078–1092.

Lambert, Douglas, M., James, R. S. and Lisa, M. E. 1998. Fundamentals of Logistics Management. Boston: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.

Bulajic, M., Savic, G., Savic, S., Mihailovic, N., and Martic, M. 2011. Efficiency assessment of banks in Serbia. Technics Technologies Education Management-TTEM. 6(3): 657–662.

Robbins, S.P., 1990. Organization Theory: Structure, Design, and Applications. 3rd ed. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

Coelli, T. A. 1996. Guide to DEAP, Version 2.1: A Data Envelopment Analysis (Computer) Program. Center for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, University of New England, Working paper. 96(08).

Karimi, A., Malekmohamadi, I., Daryani, M. A., & Rezvanfar, A. 2011. A Conceptual Model of Intrapreneurship in the Iranian Agricultural Extension Organization: Implications for HRD. Journal of European Industrial Training. 35(7): 632–657.

Van Doorm, S., Jansen, J. J., Van den Bosch, F. A., and Volberda, H. W. 2013. Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance: Drawing Attention to the Senior Team. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 30(5): 821–836.

Downloads

Published

2014-07-08