ROLE OF CULTURAL HERITAGE IN SUSTAINABLE HISTORIC URBAN DEVELOPMENT: ECONOMIC PERCEPTIONS' OF STAKEHOLDERS (PERCEIVED VALUE)

Authors

  • Noor Fazamimah M. A. Department of Architecture, Faculty of Built Environment, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • Anuar A. Department of Estate Management, Faculty of Built Environment, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • Yahaya A. Department of Architecture, Faculty of Built Environment, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v75.5229

Keywords:

Cultural heritage, sustainable development, cultural economic value

Abstract

This research has examined the possibilities of economic perceptions’ of stakeholders in explaining the role of cultural heritage in sustaining the value of urban historic site ofGeorge Town, Penang World Heritage Site (GTWHS). This research has examined the possibilities of several attitudes of the stakeholders in explaining the importance of preserving the value of cultural heritage for the GTWHS conservation. Pearson’s Correlation and Multiple Linear Regressions analysis were used in predicting the dependent variable using a set of several independent variables. The purpose of the correlation test was to prove whether the correlation between the dimensions of the independent variables has had any influence on the non-use value of cultural heritage for the GTWHS conservation. A face-to-face interviewing technique using the structured CV questionnaire aided by photo images-supported was applied in this survey. The numbers of completed questionnaires were 294 from local residents and 147 from tourists (domestic and foreign) in GTWHS. This paper reveals that there was a relationship between the local stakeholders’ attitude and responses on the importance of preserving the non-use value of cultural heritage and the WTP value for the GTWHS conservation.

References

Throsby, D. 2014. The Role of Culture in Sustainable Urban Development: Some Economic Issues'. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues. 13(2-4): 89-99.

Throsby, D. 2010. The Economics of Cultural Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kim, S. S., Wong, K. K. F., & Cho, M. 2007. Assessing the Economic Value of a World Heritage Site and Willingness-to-pay Determinants: A Case of Changdeok Palace. Tourism Management. 28: 317-322.

Rolfe, J., & Windle, J. 2003. Valuing the Protection of Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Sites. The Economics Record. 79(Special Issue): 85-95.

Samdin, Z. 2010. Factors Influencing the Willingness-to-pay for Entrance Permit: The Evidence from Taman Negara National Park. Journal of Sustainable Development. 3(3).

Nuryanti, W. 1996. Heritage and Postmodern Tourism. Annals of Tourism Research. 23: 249-260.

Peters, H. 1999. Making Tourism Work for Heritage Preservation: Lijiang, A Case Study. Paper presented at the UNESCO and the Nature Conservancy: International Conference on Anthropology, Chinese Society and Tourism.

Aas, C., Ladkin, A., & Fletcher, J. 2005. Stakeholder Collaboration and Heritage Management. Annals of Tourism Research. 32(1): 28-48.

Mohammadi, M., Khalifah, Z., & Hosseini, H. 2010. Local People Perceptions toward Social, Economic abs Environmental Impacts of Tourism in Kermanshah (Iran). Asian Social Science. 6(11): 220-225.

Engelhardt, R. A. 1997. Heritage for the Future: The Challenge of Preserving the Historic Environment in the Rapidly Modernizing Context of Asia. Paper presented at the 7th Seminar on the Conservation of Asian Cultural Heritage. The World Cultural heritage in Asian Countries: Sustainable Development and Conservation.

Baral, N., Stern, M. J., & Bhattarai, R. 2008. Contingent Valuation of Ecotourism in Annapuma Conservation Area, Nepal: Implications for Sustainable Parks Finance and Local Development. Ecological Economics. 66: 218-227.

Hajialikhani, M. 2008. A Systematic Stakeholders Management Approach for Protecting the Spirit of Cultural Heritage Sites Paper presented at the ICOMOS 16th General Assembly and Scientific Symposium, Quebec.

Pimbert, M., Gujja, B., & Shah, M. 1996. Village Voices Challenging Wetland Management Policies: PRA Experiences from Pakistan and India. from IIED London:

Mitchell, R. C., & Carson, R. T. (Eds). 1989. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Washington D. C: Resources for the Future.

Khee, P. C., Hoong, T. C., & Ying, N. P. 2009. A Contingent Valuation Estimation of Hill Recreational and Services Values in Malaysia. Serdang: Faculty of Economics and Management, Universiti Putra Malaysia.

Mourato, S., & Mazzanti, M. 2002. Economic Valuation of Cultural Heritage: Evidence and Prospects. Los Angeles: The Getty Conservation Institute.

Downloads

Published

2015-08-20

How to Cite

ROLE OF CULTURAL HERITAGE IN SUSTAINABLE HISTORIC URBAN DEVELOPMENT: ECONOMIC PERCEPTIONS’ OF STAKEHOLDERS (PERCEIVED VALUE). (2015). Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 75(9). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v75.5229