MULTIPLANAR RECONSTRUCTED CT STUDY OF NORMAL ACETABULUM – INCLINATION ANGLE, ANTEVERSION ANGLE AND ACETABULAR DEPTH

Authors

  • Mohd Shukry Mohd Khalid Department of Radiology, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian Kelantan, Malaysia
  • Rohaizan Yunus Department of Radiology, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian Kelantan, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v77.6217

Keywords:

Acetabular morphometry, CT scan, hip replacement

Abstract

Knowledge of acetabular morphometry parameters namely acetabular inclination and anteversion angles beside acetabular depth aid surgeons to accurately plan hip replacement procedure. The current hip implants designed based on Caucasian population which may not accurately match morphologic features of our population. Our objective is to determine normal acetabular morphometric parameters from CT scans of Malay patients in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia and compare gender and age group differences. A cross-sectional study was done within 18 months duration from November 2010 till May 2012. A total of 133 samples collected and divided into four age groups. Mean and standard deviations for all parameters were determined. No significant difference between acetabular parameters among males and females (p>0.001). Significant difference between age groups noted, mainly in group 1 (18 to 30 years) with group 4 (51 to 60 years) in all parameters. As for conclusion, no significant parameter differences between genders, hence no indication for gender or population specific hip implants. Significant differences noted when parameters compared between age groups, especially between the two extremes of age groups.

References

Wasielewski, R. C., Cooperstein, L., Kruger, M. & Rubash, H. (1990). Acetabular Anatomy And The Transacetabular Fixation Of Screws In Total Hip Arthroplasty. Journal Of Bone And Joint Surgery. American Volume. 72(4): 501-508.

Steinberg, M. E. 2007. Total Hip Replacement Arthroplasty: Past, Present and Future. University Pensylvania Orthopaedic Journal. 19: 125.

Rabin, D. N., Smith, C., Kubicka, R. A., Rabin, S., Ali, A., Charters, J. and Rabin, H. 1987. Problem Prostheses: The Radiologic Evaluation Of Total Joint Replacement. Radiographics. 7(6): 1107-1127.

Martinez, C. R., Di Pasquale, T. G., Helfet, D. L., Graham, A. W., Sanders, R. W. and Ray, L. 1992. Evaluation Of Acetabular Fractures With Two-And Three-Dimensional CT. Radiographics. 12(2): 227-242.

Perreira, A. C., Hunter, J. C., Laird, T. and Jamali, A. A. Multilevel Measurement Of Acetabular Version Using 3-D CT-Generated Models: Implications For Hip Preservation Surgery. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®. 469(2): 552-561.

Umer, M., Thambyah, A., Tan, W. and De, S. D. 2006. Acetabular Morphometry For Determining Hip Dysplasia In The Singaporean Population. Journal Of Orthopaedic Surgery-Hong Kong. 14(1): 27.

Maruyama, M., Feinberg, J. R., Capello, W. N. and D'Antonio, J. A. 2001. Morphologic Features Of The Acetabulum And Femur: Anteversion Angle And Implant Positioning. Clinical Orthopaedics And Related Research. 393: 52.

Murtha, P., Hafez, M., Jaramaz, B. and AM DiGioia, I. 2008. Variations In Acetabular Anatomy With Reference To Total Hip Replacement. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-British Volume. 90(3): 308.

Stem, E. S., O’Connor, M. I., Kransdorf, M. J. and Crook, J. 2006. Computed Tomography Analysis Of Acetabular Anteversion And Abduction. Skeletal Radiology. 35(6): 385-389.

Han, C. D., Yoo, J. H., Lee, W. S. and Choe, W. S. 1998. Radiographic Parameters Of Acetabulum For Dysplasia In Korean Adults. Yonsei Medical Journal. 39(5): 404-408.

Saikia, K., Bhuyan, S. and Rongphar, R. 2008. Anthropometric Study Of The Hip Joint In Northeastern Region Population With Computed Tomography Scan. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. 42(3): 260.

Henry, A., Karanjeev, J., Charles, W. O. and Roger, O. Differences In Hip Morphology Between The Sexes In Patients Undergoing Hip Resurfacing. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 5.

McKee, J. 2008. Do Gender-Specific Implants Make A Ckinical Difference?. American Association of Orthopaedics Now. April Issue.

Downloads

Published

2015-11-11

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

MULTIPLANAR RECONSTRUCTED CT STUDY OF NORMAL ACETABULUM – INCLINATION ANGLE, ANTEVERSION ANGLE AND ACETABULAR DEPTH. (2015). Jurnal Teknologi, 77(6). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v77.6217