THE SIGNIFICANCE OF UNIQUENESS, COMFORT, SECURITY AND SAFETY TO PLACE ATTACHMENT

Authors

  • Bambang Karsono Cluster of Integrated Design, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Malikussaleh Universitay, Lhokseumawe, Aceh, Indonesia
  • Sri Shindi Indira Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Panca Budi University, Medan, Indonesia
  • Deni Deni Cluster of Integrated Design, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Malikussaleh Universitay, Lhokseumawe, Aceh, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.8278

Keywords:

Place attachment, uniqueness, comfort, security and safety

Abstract

Uniqueness, comfort, security and safety are attributes in a place that can influence the place attachment. Place attachment is the relationship of function and emotional components between people and place that creates meaning. Place attachment in public open spaces is usually related with the bond of the people and its physical environment and also the perception either negative or positive of the place. This research examine the role of uniqueness, comfort, security and safety as attributes which influenced the place attachment in the Kuching Riverfront Promenade (KRP), a popular public space among the locals people. Mixed method approach was using in this research to discovers the role of attributes to place attachment. A total of 165 respondents and 18 stall operators were interviewed, at the same time field survey was conducted in a selected area of the promenade. Findings indicated that the attributes: uniqueness, comfort, security and safety have a strong impact to respondents to identify the local environment and it exerts influence on the place attachment.

References

Bentley, I. 1992. Responsive Environments: A Manual For Designers. Oxford: Butterworth Architecture.

Carmona, M., Heath, T., Oc, T., & Tiesdell, S. 2003. Public Places - Urban Spaces, The Dimensions Of Urban Design. Oxford: Architectural Press.

Gustafson, P. 2001. Meanings Of Place: Everyday Experience And Theoritical Conceptualizations. Journal Of Environmental Psychology. 21: 5-16.

Lynch, K. 1981. Good City Form. Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Montgomery, J. 1998. Making A City: Urbanity, Vitality And Urban Design. Journal of Urban Design. 3(1): 254-281.

Relph, E. 1976. Place And Placelessness. London: Pion Publication.

Jacobs, J. 1984. The Dead And Life Of Great American Cities: The Failure Of Modern Town Planning. London: Peregrine Books.

Dolbani, M. 2000. Responsive Public Open Spaces In The City Centre Of Kuala Lumpur. Unpublished PHD Thesis, Oxford Brookes University.

Yeung, H. W., & Victor, R. (1996). Urban imagery and the main street of nation: The legibility of Orchard Road in the eyes of Singaporeans. Journal of Urban Studies, 33(3).

Lynch, K. 1960. The Image Of The City. Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Creswell, W. J. 1994. Research Design: Qualitative And Quantitative Approach. California: Sage Publication Inc.

Shuhana, S. 2004. Kriteria Kejayaan Jalan Membeli-Belah Tradisi Di Malaysia: Kajian Kes Kuala Lumpur. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

Rennick, L. K. 2003. Process: A Startegy For Developing Community Life And Place Attachment. Virginia Polythenic Institute, Unpublished MA Thesis.

Downloads

Published

2016-04-18

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

THE SIGNIFICANCE OF UNIQUENESS, COMFORT, SECURITY AND SAFETY TO PLACE ATTACHMENT. (2016). Jurnal Teknologi, 78(5). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.8278