NUMERICAL INVESTIGATION OF FILLET WELDS EFFECTS ON THE LOCAL BUCKLING OF BOX STEEL COLUMNS

Authors

  • Seyed Shaker Hashemi Department of Civil Engineering, Persian Gulf University, Shahid Mahini Street, Bushehr, Iran.
  • Mehdi Hemmat University of Newcastle, School of Engineering, Newcastle, Australia.
  • Kabir Sadeghi Department of Civil Engineering, Near East University, ZIP Code: 99138, Nicosia, North Cyprus, Mersin 10, Turkey.
  • Mohammad Vaghefi Department of Civil Engineering, Persian Gulf University, Shahid Mahini Street, Bushehr, Iran.
  • Amin Masihzadeh Department of Civil Engineering, Islamic Azad University of Bushehr, Varzesh Street, Bushehr, Iran.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/mjce.v29.15604

Keywords:

Box steel column, groove weld, fillet weld, local buckling, weld leg size, overlap length, energy absorption

Abstract

The local buckling has always been known as an undesirable and destructive phenomenon in steel
structures. Thus, it is necessary to identify the effective factors in local buckling of the steel box column. Currently, box columns are generally fabricated by welding plates using fillet or groove welds with various manufacturing patterns, in terms of weld leg size and the overlap length of the plates. Hence, the evaluation of these patterns and also the control of local buckling in built sections seem to be essential. In this research, a variety of columns with different welding patterns, including groove and fillet welds with various overlap values and weld legs are numerically modeled and their local buckling behavior is studied in the finite element domain by using ABAQUS software. A suitable welding pattern is proposed by assessing the energy absorption, as well as stress distribution, stress concentration and finally local buckling in steel box section columns. The obtained results indicate that, the sections fabricated utilizing groove welds, have the best nonlinear performance. And also a suitable implementation of fillet welds to fabricate steel box columns is to consider 20% overlap length and 80% weld leg size to plate thickness as this model subject to small amount of local buckling. This model has shown less than 6% reduction in plastic capacity and energy absorption in comparison with groove welding. Another method is to use 50% for both overlap length and weld leg size to plate thickness. This model has shown less than 8% reduction in plastic capacity and energy absorption in comparison with groove welding. In addition, unsuitable implementation of fillet welds especially with small overlaps and weld leg sizes has shown a 12.5% reduction in plastic capacity and energy absorption, compared to groove welding

References

ABAQUS Standard User’s Mmanual, (2012), Version 6.10.1, New York, USA.

ANSI/ASIC 360-10 (2010). Specification for Structural Steel Buildings. American Institute of

Steel Construction, Chicago, IL.

Chiew, S., Lee, S. and Shanmugam, N. (1987) Experimental research of thin-walled steel box

column, Structural Engineering, 113(10): 2208-2220.

Cuong, B. (2013) Buckling of thin-walled members analyzed by Mindlin-Reissner finite strip,

Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 48 (1): 77-91.

Hashemi, S., Vaghefi, M., Hemmat, M. and Masihzadeh, A, (2016) Comparison the capacity of

box steel columns, fabricated with groove and fillet welds, International Journal of Steel

Structures, 16(2): 373-382.

Iranian National Steel Structural Building Code (2012), Design and Implementation of Steel

Structures, Iran Department of Housing and Urban Development, Tehran, Iran.

Migita, Y. and Fukumoto, Y. (1997) Local buckling behavior of polygonal sections,

Constructional Steel Research, 41(2-3): 221-233.

Moradi, M. and Arwade, S. (2014) Improving buckling response of the square steel tube by using

steel foam, Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 51(6): 1017-1036.

Mulligan, G.P. and Pekoz, T. (1984) Analysis of Locally Buckled Thin-Walled Columns,

Seventh International Specialty Conference on Cold-Formed Steel Structures, St. Louis,

Missouri, U.S.A.

Ostapenko, A. (1977) Local buckling of welded tubular columns, Thin-Walled Structures, 40(2):

–123.

Povlocic, L., Froschmeier, B., Kuhlmann, U. and Beg, D. (2010) Slender thin-walled box

columns subjected to compression and bending, Journal of Civil Engineering and

Management, 16(2): 179-188.

Richard Liew, J.Y., Shanmugam, N.E. and Lee, S.L. (1988) Local buckling of thin-walled steel

box columns, Thin-Walled Structures, 8(2): 119–145.

Seif, M. and Schafer, B.W. (2010) Local buckling of structural steel shapes, Constructional Steel

Research, 66(10): 1232–1247.

Wang, Y., Li, G., Chen, S., Sun, F. (2014) Experimental and numerical study on the behavior of

axially compressed high strength steel box-columns, Engineering Structures, 58:79–91.

Shen, H. (2012) Ultimate capacity of welded box section columns with slender plate elements,

Steel and Composite Structures, 13(1): 15-33.

Shen, H. (2014) On the direct strength and effective yield strength method design of medium and

high strength steel welded square section columns with slender plate elements, Steel and

Composite Structures, 17(4): 497-516.

Shen, H. (2015), Behavior of high-strength steel welded rectangular section beam–columns with

slender webs, Thin-Walled Structures, 88: 16-27.

Usami, T. and Fukumoto, Y. (1982) Local and overall buckling of welded box columns,

Structural Division, 108(3): 525-542.

Uy, B. (1998), “Local and post-local buckling of concrete filled steel welded box columns,

Constructional Steel Research, 47(1–3): 47–72.

Uy, B. (2000) Strength of concrete filled steel box columns incorporating local buckling,

Structural Engineering, 126(3): 341-352.

Yang, L., Zhao, M., Xu, D., Shang, F., Yuan, H., Wange, Y. and Zhang, Y. (2016) Flexural

buckling behavior of welded stainless steel box-section columns, Thin-Walled Structures,

: 185–197.

Downloads

Published

2018-01-29

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

NUMERICAL INVESTIGATION OF FILLET WELDS EFFECTS ON THE LOCAL BUCKLING OF BOX STEEL COLUMNS. (2018). Malaysian Journal of Civil Engineering, 29(3). https://doi.org/10.11113/mjce.v29.15604