FLOW BEHAVIOUR OF OIL BLOB THROUGH A CAPILLARY TUBE CONSTRICTION DURING PULSED INJECTION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v81.10010Keywords:
Flow pulsation, Capillary tube flow, Flow excitationAbstract
A numerical simulation of flow of oil blob through a capillary tube constriction is presented. The simulation was run in a 2D axisymmetric model. Water is injected at the inlet to mobilize oil blob placed near the capillary tube constriction. Transient flow images were used to understand the flow evolution process. Results from the study show that pulsed injection effectively assisted to squeeze out the oil blob through the capillary tube constriction with shorter time compared to continuous injection. Â Pulsed injection reduced the time required for the first droplet to cross the capillary tube constriction by about 3 folds compared to continuous injection. In addition, the droplet that crossed the constriction is larger when the flow was pulsed. In both cases, there is a reverse flow in the opposite direction of the injection. However, the severity of the reverse flow is stronger in the case of continuous injection. Immediately downstream the constriction, there is an adverse pressure gradient zone during continuous injection which limits the mobility of droplet that crossed the constriction. However, in the case of pulsed injection, there is a favorable pressure gradient zone immediately downstream the constriction. This zone expedites mobility of droplets that cross the constriction by transporting them further downstream through suction effect. Apparently, pulsed injection eases off the adverse pressure gradient and allowed more volume of oil to pass through the constriction. Within about two periods of pulsation, 84% of original oil placed at the beginning crossed the constriction compared to only 35% in the case of continuous injection. Even though the same amount of water was injected in both cases, pulsed injection clearly altered the flow behavior. The observation from this study may be extended to more complex flows in order to tailor the method for certain specific applications, such as flow of residual oil through a reservoir.
References
S. R. Sandrea, I. 2007. Recovery Factors Leave Vast Target for EOR Technologies. Oil and Gas Journal. 105(4): 44-47.
E. J. Manrique, C. P. Thomas, R. Ravikiran, M. Izadi Kamouei, M. Lantz, J. L. Romero, V. Alvarado. 2010. EOR: Current Status and Opportunities. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
J. R. Hite, P. L. Bondor. 2004. Planning EOR Projects. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
S. Afra, M. Tarrahi. 2015. Assisted EOR Screening Approach for CO2 Flooding with Bayesian Classification and Integrated Feature Selection Techniques. Carbon Management Technology Conference.
A. Muggeridge, A. Cockin, K. Webb, H. Frampton, I. Collins, T. Moulds, et al. 2014. Recovery Rates, Enhanced Oil Recovery and Technological Limits. Philosophical Transactions. Series A, Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences. 372: 20120320-20120320.
Al Adasani, B. Bai, 2011, Analysis of EOR Projects and Updated Screening Criteria. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 79(1-2): 10-24.
R. B. C. Gharbi. 2000. An Expert System for Selecting and Designing EOR Processes. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 27(1-2): 33-47.
R. Baker, C. Fong, C. Bowes, M. Toews. 2010. Understanding Volumetric Sweep Efficiency in SAGD Projects. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology. 49(01): 30-37.
V. N. Nikolaevskiy, G. P. Lopukhov, L. Yizhu, M. J. Economides. 1996. Residual Oil Reservoir Recovery with Seismic Vibrations. SPE Production & Facilities. 11(2): 89-94.
E. R. Abernethy. 1976. Production Increase of Heavy Oils by Electromagnetic Heating. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology. 15(03): 91-97.
P. M. Roberts, I. B. Esipov, E. L. Majer. 2003. Elastic Wave Stimulation of Oil Reservoirs: Promising EOR Technology? The Leading Edge. 22(5): 448-453.
Huh. 2006. Improved Oil Recovery by Seismic Vibration: A Preliminary Assessment of Possible Mechanisms. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
O. Gurpinar. 2017. Technology Focus: EOR Performance and Modeling. Journal of Petroleum Technology. 69(01): 42-42.
M. P. Rathmann, P. L. McGuire, B. H. Carlson. 2006. Unconventional EOR Program Increases Recovery in Mature WAG Patterns at Prudhoe Bay. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
S. Rassenfoss. 2014. Carbon Dioxide May Offer an Unconventional EOR Option. Journal of Petroleum Technology. 66(2): 52-56.
T. Hamida, T. Babadagli. 2006. Investigations on Capillary and Viscous Displacement under Ultrasonic Waves. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology. 45(02): 16-19.
I. A. Beresnev, P. A. Johnson. 1994. Elasticâ€wave Stimulation of Oil Production: A Review of Methods and Results. GEOPHYSICS. 59(6): 1000-1017.
P. M. Roberts, S. A. Kostrove, W. O. Wooden, E. L. Majer, T. M. Daley. 2001. Laboratory and Field Observations of Stress-wave Induced Changes in Oil Flow Behavior. Society of Exploration Geophysicists. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts. 2001: 1682-1685.
S. Chingulpitak, S. Wongwises. 2010. Two-phase Flow Model of Refrigerants Flowing Through Helically Coiled Capillary Tubes. Applied Thermal Engineering. 30(14-15): 1927-1936.
L. Yan, K. E. Thompson, K. T. Valsaraj. 2006. A Numerical Study on the Coalescence of Emulsion Droplets in a Constricted Capillary Tube. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 298(2): 832-844.
A. Fluent. 2015. Ansys Fluent. Academic Research. Release 16(1): 14: 1336-1372.
O. Kouznetsov, E. Simkin, G. Chilingar, and S. Katz. 1998. Improved Oil Recovery by Application of Vibro-energy to Waterflooded Sandstones. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 19(3): 191-200.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright of articles that appear in Jurnal Teknologi belongs exclusively to Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Penerbit UTM Press). This copyright covers the rights to reproduce the article, including reprints, electronic reproductions, or any other reproductions of similar nature.
