DO GREEK MUNICIPAL WEBSITES MEET CITIZENS’ PERCEPTIONS ON ISSUE IMPORTANCE?

Authors

  • Georgios Lappas Western Macedonia University of Applied Sciences, Department of Digital Media and Communication, Greece, Kastoria
  • Prodromos Yannas Piraeus University of Applied Sciences, Department of Business Administration, Greece, Aigaleo
  • Amalia Triantafillidou Western Macedonia University of Applied Sciences, Department of Digital Media and Communication, Greece, Kastoria
  • Alexandros Kleftodimos Western Macedonia University of Applied Sciences, Department of Digital Media and Communication, Greece, Kastoria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.10021

Keywords:

E-government, e-democracy, Greek municipalities, citizens’ perceived importance, evaluation

Abstract

The purpose of the present study is first to evaluate local e-government initiatives in Greece from a citizen perspective and then to test how well Greek municipalities perform on the most important e-government applications as perceived by citizens. Towards this end, a citizen survey was conducted using an instrument that contained 14 indices and assessed citizens’ perceived importance of e-government as well as e-democracy features incorporated in municipal portals. Results indicate that Greek citizens are not ready to move forward with the adoption of more participatory and deliberative tools of local governments’ websites. Moreover, Greek citizens want easy to complete online services while they place emphasis on the informational content of the local governments’ websites. In addition they desire simple ways to communicate with their local governments such as contact or email forms and suggestion boxes. Based on the citizen survey results, a quantitative website analysis was conducted to examine the level of sophistication of Greek municipal portals in regards to the most important e-government features. Results suggest that Greek local governments can be regarded as laggards in the provision of online services to citizens and businesses as well as the inclusion of information for tourists.

References

Hiller, J. and Belanger, F. 2001. Privacy Strategies for Electronic Government. E-government. 200: 162-198.

Baum, C. and A. Di Maio, A. 2000. Gartner’s Four Phases of E-Government Model, from http://www.gartner.com

Wescott, C. 2001. E-Government in the Asia-Pacific Region. Asian Journal of Political Science. 9(2): 1-24.

Chadwick, A. 2003. Bringing E-Democracy Back Why It Matters for Future Research on E-Governance. Social Science Computer Review. 21(4): 443-455.

Reddick, C.G. 2005. Citizen Interaction with E-Government: From the Streets to Servers?. Government Information Quarterly. 22(1): 38-57.

Holzer, M. and Kim, S.T. 2005. Digital Governance in Municipalities Worldwide. Newark. NJ: Rutgers University Campus at Newark.

Huang, Z. 2007. A Comprehensive Analysis of US Counties’ E-Government Portals: Development Status and Functionalities. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(2): 149-164.

D'agostino, M.J., Schwester, R., Carrizales, T. and Melitski, J. 2011. A Study of E-Government and E-Governance: An Empirical Examination of Municipal Websites. Public Administration Quarterly. 35(1): 3-25.

Sandoval-Almazan, R. and Gil-Garcia, J. R. 2012. Are Government Internet Portals Evolving Towards more Interaction, Participation, and Collaboration? Revisiting the Rhetoric of E-Government among Municipalities. Government Information Quarterly. 29: S72-S81.

Peters, R.M., Janssen, M. and van Engers, T.M. 2004. Measuring E-Government Impact: Existing Practices and Shortcomings. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Electronic Commerce. ACM. 480-489.

Moon, M.J. 2002. The Evolution of E-Government Among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality?â€. Public Administration Review. 62(4): 424-433.

Yannas, P. and Lappas, G. 2007. Evaluating Local E-Government: An Analysis of Greek Prefecture Websites. 2nd International Conference in Digital Information Management, IEEE, ICDIM'07. 1: 254-259.

Macintosh, A. 2003. Using Information and Communication Technologies to Enhance Citizen Engagement in the Policy Process. In: OECD (eds.). Promise and Problems of E-Democracy Challenges of Online Citizen Engagement. Paris: 19-142.

Tambouris, E., Macintosh, A., Coleman, S., Wimmer, M., Vedel, T., Westholm, H., Lippa, B., Dalakiouridou, E., Parisopoulos, K.and Rose, J. 2007c. Introducing eParticipation. University of Macedonia.

Chatfield, A.T. and Alhujran, O. 2009. A Cross-Country Comparative Analysis of E-Government Service Delivery among Arab Countries. Information Technology for Development. 15(3): 151-170.

Downloads

Published

2016-12-15

How to Cite

DO GREEK MUNICIPAL WEBSITES MEET CITIZENS’ PERCEPTIONS ON ISSUE IMPORTANCE?. (2016). Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 78(12-3). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.10021