DISCOUNT PRICING STRATEGIES FOR SMART PHONE USING SYSTEM DYNAMICS MODELLING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.10115Keywords:
Decision making, system dynamic modelling, discount pricing, smartphoneAbstract
Nowadays, retailers of highly demanded products such as fashion goods and high technology electronic devices (smart phone) are aggressively competing with one another in order to increase revenue and to maintain their position in the market place. Rapid introduction of new smart phone into the market has resulted in shorter product life cycle and intensified competition, which force retailers to enhance their strategic management and creates competitive advantages. The challenge is in designing a suitable pricing strategy and discount offerings. Thus, the aim of this research is to develop a dynamic model to understand the relations between factors influencing the discount-pricing decision, to analyze performance of the discount-pricing strategy and to present an insight on the effects of the strategy implemented. Hence, to help achieve all the purposes, system dynamics approach is chosen to model the discount-pricing strategy for new smart phone. System dynamics modelling simulates the behavior of complex systems over time. Data used in the research is collected from literature review and email interview. The email interview focuses on the information of discount-pricing strategy normally used by retailers. The simulation results show that the value of cumulative sales within introduction phase is the highest as compared to other phases. Based on the survey, it is proposed that suitable discount level to be offered for new smart phone ranges from 10% to 30%. Furthermore, the study suggests that retailers can start a discount promotion early of the month of new smart phone released and, in addition, the discount-pricing strategy model of new smart phone is also produced as one of contribution of this study.
References
Johnson, J., Tellis, G. J., Ip, E. H. 2013. To Whom, When, and How Much to Discount? A Constrained Optimization of Customized Temporal Discounts. Journal of Retailing. 89(4): 361-373.
Yang, H. 2012. Impact Of Discounting And Competition On Benefit Of Decentralization With Strategic Customers. Operations Research Letters. 40(2): 123-127.
Teng, L. 2009. A Comparison Of Two Types Of Price Discounts In Shifting Consumers' Attitudes And Purchase Intentions. Journal of Business Research. 62(1): 14-21.
Palazon, M. and Delgado, E. 2009. The Moderating Role Of Price Consciousness On The Effectiveness Of Price Discounts And Premium Promotions. Journal of Product and Brand Management. 18(4): 306-312.
Thierry, C., Bel, G. and Thomas, A. 2010. The Role of Simulation in Supply Chain Management. SCS M&S Magazine. Society for Modeling and Simulation International. 4: 1-8.
Shwaikeh, A. A. 2013. Simulation Modelling Applications in Organization Managament. Master of Engineering Management, An-Najah University.
[Jianghong, M. 2010. A Integrated Supply ChainModeling and Simulation Based on System Dynamics. Management and Service Science International Conference. 1-4.
Laurikkala, H.,Vilkman, H., Ek, M., Koivisto, H. and Xiong, G.-Y. 2003. Modelling And Control Of Supply Chain With System Theory. Tampere University of Technology. Institute of Machine Design.
Kanyalkar, A. P. and Adil, G. K. 2005. An Integrated And Detailed Planning In A Multi-Site Production Environment Using Linear Programming. International Journal of Production Research. 43(20): 4431-4454.
Shukla, S. K., Tiwari, M. K., Wan, H.-D., and Shankar, R. 2010. Optimization Of The Supply Chain Network: Simulation, Taguchi, And Algorithm Embedded Approach. Computers and Industrial Engineering. 58: 29-39.
Ivanov, D. and Sokolov, B. 2010. Adaptive Supply Chain Management. London: Springer.
Mula, J., Poler, R., and Garcia, J. P. 2007. Material Requirement Planning With Fuzzy Constraints And Fuzzy Coefficients. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 158: 783-793.
Ranganathan, C., Teo, T. S. H., and Dhaliwal, J. 2011. Web Enabled Supply Chain Management: Key Antecedents And Performance Impacts. International Journal of Information Management. 31: 533-545.
Shafieezadeh, M., Rad, M.K., Raoufi, K., and Payani, N. 2011. A Framework for Analyzing and Enhancing Collaboration in Supply Chain through Dynamic Analysis. Internet Computing & Information Services (ICICIS), 2011 International Conference on. 17-18 Sept. 366-369.
Wolstenholme, E. F. 1999. Qualitative vs Quantitative Modelling: The Evolving Balance. The Journal of the Operational Research Society. 50(4): 422-428.
Luna-Reyes, L. F. and Andersen D. L. 2003. Collecting And Analyzing Qualitative Data For System Dynamics: Methods And Models. System Dynamics Review. 19(4): 271-296.
Coyle, G. and Exelby, D. 2000. The Validation Of Commercial System Dynamics Models. System Dynamics Review. 16 (1): 27-41.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright of articles that appear in Jurnal Teknologi belongs exclusively to Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Penerbit UTM Press). This copyright covers the rights to reproduce the article, including reprints, electronic reproductions, or any other reproductions of similar nature.