SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF SCALED IBS BLOCK COLUMN FOR STATIC NONLINEAR MONOTONIC PUSHOVER EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v80.10799Keywords:
Pushover test, industrialized building system (IBS), reinforced concrete block column, scaling factor, seismic performance levelAbstract
This paper presents the seismic performance of the down scaled 1:5 model IBS block column with non-linear static analysis. The aim of this research is to access the ultimate capacity and structural behaviour of the IBS block column. This paper demonstrates the theoretical prediction of the full-scale prototype strength based on scaling factors at non-linear state. Besides, this research investigates the ultimate shear capacity, stiffness, bolt strength, inter-storey drift and block separation for prediction of seismic performance levels. Concrete material properties, mix specification and steel reinforcement detailing for scaled model are tabulated in this paper. The methodology of this research begins with full scale prototype design, scaling to the small model and followed by the scaled model fabrication. Theoretical lateral load prediction associated with scaling factors are also performed. The experiment test was carried out on the assembled scaled 1:5 IBS block column with proper displacement measuring equipment on test rig and graphical capture tools. The data of roof top displacement with base shear capacity, inter-storey drift and gap separations were tabulated for discussions. The tested ultimate roof top displacement was 128 mm with 3.1 kN base shear. The calculated elastic stiffness of the IBS block column was 0.137 kN/mm, followed by yielding stiffness of 0.033 kN/mm and 0.014 kN/mm plastic stiffness. The significant inter-storey drift was due to cracking and crushing of column blocks edges. The measured maximum separation gap was 24.4 mm located at 340 mm height due to the rocking of the column. Based on seismic performance levels indicator from FEMA 273 & 356, the column was in the state of immediate occupancy with 21 mm roof top displacement and 1.7 kN base shear. The life safety is limited at 65.27 mm roof top displacement with 2.4 kN of base shear. All scaled down data was then reverted to full scale prototype capacity according with the respective scaling factors. It concluded that the IBS blockwork column is capable of resisting the seismic event without falling of the blocks that endanger the occupant life at the maximum credible earthquakes of 1.3 g horizontal spectral acceleration equivalent to X+ Mercalli’s scale.
References
Haiti Tallies Body Count of 150,000. 2010. CBC News. 24 January 2010. Retrieved 24th Jan 2010, < http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/haiti-tallies-body-count-of-150-000-1.893806>.
Pacific Tsunami Warning Center/NOAA/NWS: Tsunami Bulletin Number 003. 2012. PTWC. 11 April 2012. Retrieved 11 April 2012. < http://ptwc.weather.gov/ptwc/text.php?id=indian.TSUIOX.2012.04.11.1014>.
Sumatra Shaken by New Earthquake. 2005. BBC News. 10 April 2005. Retrieved 24 December 2012. < http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/4430255.stm>.
Nasim, U. and Uday, V. 2005. Ballistic Testing of Polymer Composites to Manufacture Emergency Safe House Shelters. Journal of Composites for Construction. 9(4): 369-375. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE).
Nur, Y., Tanya, T. and Danny, K. 2005. Hurricane Wind Shelter Retrofit Room Guidelines for Existing Houses. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction. 10(4): 246-252, American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE).
Marsono, A. K., Masine, M. T. 2016. A Building Assembly System. MyIPO. Patent No UL.2016700916.
Yip, C.-C., Marsono, A. K., Wong, J.Y., and Amran, M. Y. H. 2015. Flexural Strength of Special Reinforced Lightweight Concrete Beam for Industrialised Building System (IBS). Journal of Science & Engineering. 77(1): 187-196
Nathaniel, L. 1934. A History of English Brickwork. London: H. Greville Montgomery.
Haseeb, J. 2014. Advantage and Disadvantage of Using Brick in Construction. Journal of Engineering Materials. 1: 1-3. Web Tech Tix.
Liu, H. B., Guo, X. and Yu, Y. Y. 2011. Analysis of Seismic Resistance Capability of Masonry Structure. Journal of Advance Material Research. Trans Tech Publication. 255-260.
Reece, F. S. 2007. Sustainable Precast Concrete Block Structural System. 30 Years of shearing ideas 1977-2007. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). 1-10.
Chau-Khun, M., Abdullah, Z. A., Wahid, O., Reyes, G., Kypros, P. 2016. Behaviour of Over-reinforced High-Strength Concrete Beams Confined with Post-tensioned Steel Straps: An Experimental Investigation. Journal of Structural Concrete. 17(5): 768-777.
Zhu, Y. J., Li, L. and Yang, W. H. 2011. Study on Shear Bearing Capacity of Composite Reinforced Concrete Block Masonry. Journal of Applied Mechanics and Materials. Trans Tech Publications. 94-96, 1141–1145.
Nam, S. K., Ji, H. L. and Sung, P. C. 2009. Equivalent Multi-Phase Similitude Law for Pseudo-dynamic Test on Small Scale Reinforced Concrete Models. Journal of Engineering Structure. Elsevier. 31: 834-846.
Andreas, S., Benson. S, and Joel, C. 2010. Design, Scaling, Similitude and Modelling of Shake Table Test Structures. Shake Table Training Workshop 2010. 29th September 2010. National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Programme, University of California, San Diego, CA. 1-52.
Murugan, R., Prabhu, R. V., and Thyla, P. R. 2013. Establisment of Structural Similitude for Elastic Models and Validation of Scaling Laws. Journal of Civil Engineering. Springer. 17(1): 139-144.
Helmut, K. and Eduardo, M. 2004. Performance Based Earthquake Engineering. Stanford, California: CRC Press LLC.
British Standard Institution. 2002. European Code 2: Design of Concrete Structure. London: British Standards Institution.
British Standard Institution. 1998. European Code 8: Design of Structure for Earthquake Resistance. London: British Standards Institution.
Chau-Khun M., Abdullah Z. A., Wahid, O. 2015. Flexural Ductility Design of Confined High-strength Concrete Columns: Theoretical Modelling. Journal of Measurement. 48: 42-48.
Federal Emergency Management Agency. 2000. FEMA 356 Pre-standard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Building. Washington, D.C.: Department of Homeland Security.
Federal Emergency Management Agency. 1998. FEMA 310 Handbook for the Seismic Evaluation of Buildings. Washington, D.C: Building Safety Seismic Council.
Yip, C.-C., and Marsono, A. K. 2016. Structural Seismic Performance of Reinforced Concrete Block System for Two Storeys Safe House. Journal of Science & Engineering. 78(2): 83-97.
British Standard Institution. 1997. BS5328: Method of Specifying Concrete Mixes. London: British Standards Institution.
Federal Emergency Management Agency. 1996. FEMA 273 NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Building. Washington, D.C: Building Safety Seismic Council.
Federal Emergency Management Agency. 2005. FEMA 440 Improvements of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures. Washington, D.C.: Department of Homeland Security.
Federal Emergency Management Agency. 1997. FEMA 274 NEHRP Guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Washington, D.C.: Building Safety Seismic Council.
British Standard Institution. 1992. European Code 3: Design of Steel Structure. London: British Standards Institution.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright of articles that appear in Jurnal Teknologi belongs exclusively to Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Penerbit UTM Press). This copyright covers the rights to reproduce the article, including reprints, electronic reproductions, or any other reproductions of similar nature.