FLAMMABILITY AND BURNING RATES OF LOW QUALITY BIOGAS AT ATMOSPHERIC CONDITION

Authors

  • Mohd Suardi Suhaimi Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Chemical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Aminuddin Saat Department of Thermofluids, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Mazlan Abdul Wahid Department of Thermofluids, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v79.11892

Keywords:

Actual biogas, simulated biogas, flammability limit, buoyancy, burning rate

Abstract

This study focuses on the flammability and burning rate of simulated and actual biogas-air mixture for equivalence ratio of 0.5 to 1.0. The content of simulated biogas was set at 50% CH4 and 50% CO2 to emulate the typical composition of low quality biogas. Studies on low quality biogas combustion with this particular CH4 and CO2 content are still scarce in literature. It was found that the flammability limits fall within the same range for both simulated and actual biogas from 0.6 to 0.9 which is substantially narrower compared to pure methane. Incidence of flame buoyancy were observed for both simulated and actual biogas at equivalence ratio of 0.6 and 0.7. The maximum burning rates were almost identical for simulated and actual biogas at 21.18 cm/s and 24.74 cm/s respectively. It was also found that the peak of burning rate occurs at the leaner equivalence ratio of 0.8 for both simulated and actual biogas. These observations imply the significance of CO2 on biogas combustion. Compared to pure methane, the reduction in burning rate and the shift in the peak burning rate to the leaner mixture suggest the physical and chemical effects of CO2 on biogas combustion. Physically, the presence of CO2 could adversely affect the temperature driven CH4 preferential diffusion into the reaction zone since CO2 could absorb some of the heat released during combustion. When present at 50% or higher, CO2 could significantly reduce OH radical formation thereby narrowing the flammability limits and reducing the burning rates.  

References

Schoen, E. J. and D. M. Bagley. 2012. Biogas Production and Feasibility of Energy Recovery Systems for Anaerobic Treatment of Wool-Scouring Effluent. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 62: 21-30.

Metghalchi, M., J. C. Keck. 1980. Combustion and Flame. 38: 143-154.

Fischer, M., Jiang X. 2015. An Investigation of the Chemical Kinetics of Biogas Combustion. Fuel. 150: 711-720.

Bosschaart, K. J., de Goey, L. P. H. 2004. The Laminar Burning Velocity of Flames Propagating in Mixtures of Hydrocarbons and Air Measured with the Heat Flux Method. Combustion and Flame. 136: 261-269.

Konnov, A. A., Dyakov, I. V., De Ruyck, J. 2003. Measurement of Adiabatic Burning Velocity in Ethane–Oxygen–Nitrogen and in Ethane–Oxygen–Argon Mixtures. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 27: 379-384.

Chao, B. H., Egolfopoulos, F. N., Law, C. K. 1997. Structure and Propagation of Premixed Flame in Nozzle-generated Counterflow. Combustion and Flame. 109: 620-638.

Jackson, G. S., Sai, R., Plaia, J. M., Boggs, C. M., Kiger, K. T. 2003. Influence of H2 on the Response of Lean Premixed CH4 Flames to High Strained Flows. Combustion and Flame. 132: 503-511.

Taylor, S. C. 1991. Burning Velocity and the Effect of Flame Stretch. PhD Thesis. University of Leeds.

Hassan, M. I., Aung, K. T., Faeth, G. M. 1998. Measured and Predicted Properties of Laminar Premixed Methane/Air Flames at Various Pressures. Combustion and Flame. 115: 539-550.

Gu, X. J., Haq, M. Z., Lawes, M., Woolley,R. 2000. Laminar Burning Velocity and Markstein Lengths of Methane–air Mixtures. Combustion and Flame. 121: 41-58.

Hinton, N., Stone, R. 2014. Laminar Burning Velocity Measurements of Methane and Carbon Dioxide Mixtures (Biogas) Over Wide Ranging Temperatures and Pressures. Fuel. 116: 743-750.

Bradley, D., Hicks, R. A., Lawes, M., Sheppard, C. G. W., and Woolley, R. 1998. The Measurement of Laminar Burning Velocities and Markstein Numbers for Iso-octane–Air and Iso-octane–nHeptane–Air Mixtures at Elevated Temperatures and Pressures in an Explosion Bomb. Combustion and Flame. 115(1-2):126-144.

Gillespie, L., Lawes, M., Sheppard, C. G. W., and Woolley, R. 2000. Aspects of Laminar and Turbulent Burning Velocity Relevant to SI Engines. Society of Automotive Engineers.

Pizutti, L, Martins, C. A., Lacava, P. T. 2016. Laminar Burning Velocity and Flammability Limits in Biogas: A Literature Review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 62: 856-865.

Zhen, H. S, Leung C. W., Cheung C. S. 2013. Effects of Hydrogen Addition on the Characteristics of a Biogas Diffusion Flame. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 38: 6874-81.

Moghaddam, E. A, Ahlgren S., Hulteberg, C., Nordberg, Ã…. 2015. Energy Balance and Global Warming Potential of Biogas-based Fuels from a Life Cycle Perspective. Fuel Processing Technology.132: 74-82.

Law, C. K. 2006. Combustion Physics. Cambridge University Press.

Suhaimi, M. S., Saat, A., Wahid, M. A., Sies, M. M. 2016. Flame Propagation and Burning Rates of Methane-Air Mixtures Using Schlieren Photography. Jurnal Teknologi. 78(10-2)21-27.

Miao, H., Liu, Y. 2014. Measuring the Laminar Burning Velocity and Markstein Length of Premixed Methane/Nitrogen/Air Mixtures with the Consideration of Nonlinear Stretch Effects. Fuel. 121: 208-215.

Liang, W., Chen, Z., Yan, F., Zhang, H. 2013. Effects of Soret diffusion on the Laminar Flame Speed and Markstein length of Syngas/Air Mixtures. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute. 34: 695-702.

Cardona C, Amell AA.2013. Laminar Burning Velocity and Interchangeability Analysis of Biogas/C3H3/H2 with Normal and Oxygen-enriched Air. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 39: 7994-8001.

Anggono, W., Wardana, I. N. G., Lawes, M., Hughes, K. J. 2014. Effect of Inhibitors on Biogas Laminar Burning Velocity and Flammability Limits in Spark Ignited Premix Combustion. International Journal of Engineering and Technology (IJET). 5(6): 4980-4987.

Qiao, L., Gan, Y., Nishiie, T., Dahm, W. J. A., Oran, E. S. 2010. Extinction of Premixed Methane/Air Flames in Microgravity by Diluents: Effects of Radiation And Lewis Number. Combustion and Flame. 157: 1446-1455.

Mameri, A., Tabet, F. 2016. Numerical Investigation of Counter-flow Diffusion Flame of Biogas–hydrogen Blends: Effects of Biogas Composition, Hydrogen Enrichment and Scalar Dissipation Rate on Flame Structure and Emissions. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 41: 2011-2022.

Downloads

Published

2017-11-20

How to Cite

FLAMMABILITY AND BURNING RATES OF LOW QUALITY BIOGAS AT ATMOSPHERIC CONDITION. (2017). Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 79(7-3). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v79.11892