EFFECTS OF HELICOPTER HORIZONTAL TAIL CONFIGURATIONS ON AERODYNAMIC DRAG CHARACTERISTICS

Authors

  • Iskandar Shah Ishak Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Muhammad Fitri Mougamadou Zabaroulla Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v79.12267

Keywords:

Aerodynamic drag, ellipsoidal fuselage, helicopter, stabilizer, wind tunnel

Abstract

Experimental aerodynamic investigations remain the subject of interest in rotorcraft community since the flow around the helicopter is dominated by complex aerodynamics and flow interaction phenomena. The objective of this study is to determine the aerodynamic drag characteristics of helicopter horizontal tail by conducting wind tunnel tests. To fulfil the objective, three of the most common helicopter horizontal tail configurations namely Forward Stabilizer, Low-aft Stabilizer and T-tail Stabilizer, were fabricated as a simplified scaled-down wind tunnel model mated with a standard ellipsoidal fuselage. The test wind speed for this experimental work was 30 m/s, determined from Reynolds sweep, which was corresponding to Reynolds number of 2.8 x 105. Wind tunnel tests were performed at variations angle of attack ranging from -15O to 15O with 5O interval. The results tell that at zero yaw and zero pitch angles, Forward Stabilizer contributed the least drag coefficient at 0.277 implying the configuration could be the best for cruising flight segment. Contrarily to T-tail Stabilizer, this configuration contributed the most drag coefficient at 0.303, which was 9% higher than the former. The T-tail Stabilizer was also found to be the most sensitive to the change of angle of attack where the drag was drastically increased up to 131.35% at -15O angle of attack compares to at zero angle of attack. These findings had successfully testified that the type of stabilizer configuration does significantly influencing the aerodynamic drag characteristics of helicopter. Subsequently, the selection of stabilizer must wisely be done to have the best aerodynamic efficiency and performance for the helicopter. 

References

Ammoo, M. S. B., Awal, Z. B. A. and Sangiti, N. M. 2014. Static and Dynamic Balancing of Helicopter Tail Rotor Blade Using Two-Plane Balancing Method, Jurnal Teknologi. 71(2): 49-55. DOI: 10.11113/jt.v71.3720.

Antoniadis, A. F., Drikakis, D., Zhong, B., Barakos, G., Steijlb, R., Biavac, M., Vigevano L., Brocklehurst, A., Boelense, O., Dietzf, M., Embacher, M., Khier, W. 2012. Assessment of CFD Methods Against Experimental Flow Measurements for Helicopter Flows. Aerospace Science and Technology. 19: 86-100.

Wang, Q., Zhao, Q. 2014. Modification of Leishman–Beddoes Model Incorporating with a New Trailing-edge Vortex Model. Journal of Aerospace Engineering. DOI: 10.1177/0954410014556113,

Ammoo, M. S. B. and Awal, Z. B. A. 2014. An Investigation on Crack Alleviation in Bending of Aluminium 2024 for Aircraft Applications. International Journal of Research in Aeronautical and Mechanical Engineering. 2(3): 255-269.

Hodara, J., Smith, M. J. 2014. Improvement of Crossflow Aerodynamic Predictions for Forward Flight at All Advance Ratio. 40th European Rotorcraft Forum, Southampton, United Kingdom.

Awal, Z. B. A. and Ammoo, M. S. B. 2014. Numerical Simulation and Investigation of Transonic & Symmetrical Airfoil for Helicopter Main Rotor Blade Application. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 704(1): 137-142.

Nelson, R. C. 1998. Flight Stability and Automatic Control. 2nd Edition, Singapore: McGraw-Hill.

Ortega, F. T. 2011. Deconstructing Hub Drag. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

Kerr, A. 1975. Effect of Helicopter Drag Reduction on Rotor Dynamic Loads and Blade Life. Proceedings of the American Helicopter Society Symposium.

Keys, C. N. and Rosenstein, H. J. 1978. Summary of Rotor Hub Drag Data. NASA CR-152080.

Mougamadou Zabaroulla, M. F. 2017. Experimental Research on Helicopter Horizontal Tail Configuration. Thesis. Johor Bahru: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

Leishman, G. J. 2006. Principles of Helicopter Aerodynamics with CD Extra. Cambridge University Press.

P. F. Lorber, T. A. Egofl. 1988. An Unsteady Helicopter Rotor-Fuselage Interaction Analysis, NASA Contractor Report 4178.

Ishak, I.S. 2012. Unsteady Aerodynamic Wake Of Helicopter Main-Rotor-Hub Assembly. Thesis. Johor Bahru: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

J. B. Barlow, W. H. Rae, Jr. & A. Pope. 1999. Low Speed Wind Tunnel Testing. 3rd Edition. J. Wiley & Sons.

W. Khairuddin. Aerolab Slide Presentation. 2015. Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

Ishak, I. S., Mat Lazim, T. and Mansor, S. 2008. Wind Tunnel Tests on a Generic Eurocopter 350Z Helicopter. 2nd Regional Conference on Vehicle Engineering & Technology–RiVET’08, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

R. H. Barnard. 1996. Road Vehicle Aerodynamic Design. Addison Wesley Longman Limited.

Mansor, S., Ishak, I. S. & Mat lazim, T. 2009. Wind Tunnel Measurement of Aerodynamic Characteristics of a Generic Eurocopter Helicopter. JURUTERA Bulletin. Malaysia

Osug, R. T. 2017. Experimental Research on Helicopter Vertical Tail Configuration. Thesis. Johor Bahru: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

Ishak, I. S. & Mougamadou Zabaroulla, M. F. 2017. Experimental Research on Helicopter Horizontal Tail Configuration. 2nd Multidisciplinary Conference on Mechanical Engineering–MCME 2017, Johor Bahru, Malaysia.

Downloads

Published

2017-12-07

How to Cite

EFFECTS OF HELICOPTER HORIZONTAL TAIL CONFIGURATIONS ON AERODYNAMIC DRAG CHARACTERISTICS. (2017). Jurnal Teknologi, 79(7-4). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v79.12267