REDUCTION OF DISC BRAKE SQUEAL NOISE USING CONSTRAINED LAYER DAMPERS

Authors

  • S. Arvin Rao Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Muhamad Anuwar Jusoh Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Abd Rahim Abu Bakar Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Mohd Kameil Abdul Hamid Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Khidzir Zakaria Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v79.12269

Keywords:

Disc brake, squeal, constrained layer damper, viscoelastics materials

Abstract

Brakes squeal has remained to be one of the major NVH challenges in brake system design and development. It has been a concern for automotive industry for decade. Brake researchers have proposed many brake squeal reduction and prevention methods in order to overcome and reduce the squeal that emanates from the brake disc systems. In this paper, the effectiveness of constrained layer dampers (CLD) in reducing disc brake squeal noise was investigated. CLD isolates the brake squeal noise through shear deformations of the viscoelastic materials. Two sets of brake tests were conducted using the brake test dynamometer with the application of CLD. Two different types of CLD were used which are three-layer constrained layer damper and four-layer constrained layer damper. Squeal tests were carried out using brake noise test rig based on the global standard procedure SAE J2521. From the test, four-layer CLD configuration works more efficient than three-layer CLD configuration. CLD made up of nitrile butadiene rubber, silicone rubber and mild steel proved to be the most effective noise insulator at hydraulic pressure range of 5 bar to 30 bar and temperature range of 50oC to 200oC with a maximum noise reduction of 11.3 dBA. Thus, CLD technique was proven to be an effective method in reducing brake squeal noise.

References

Akay, A. 2002. Acoustics of Friction. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111(4): 1525-1548.

Abendroth, H. and Wernitz, B. 2000. The Integrated Test Concept Dyno-vehicle. Performance and Noise. S.A.E Technical Paper. 2000-01-2774.

SAE Technical Standards Board. 2001. Disc Brake Dynamometer Squeal Noise Matrix. Warrendale, SAE J2521.

Mahboob Khan, Korey Johnson, Toby Lichtensteiger and Carly Lockrem. 2010. Evaluation and Countermeasure Development of Brake Noise on a Motorcycle Platform. SAE

Technical Paper. 2010-01-1695.

Singh, R., Sheikh, A. A. and Mitchell, M. J. 1998. Viscoelastic Damping to Control Disc Brake Squeal, Sound and Vibration: Noise and Vibration Control. 32(10): 18-22.

Triches, M., Gerges, S. N. Y. and Jordan, R. 2004.Reduction of Squeal Noise from Disc Brake System Using Constrained Layer Damping. J. of the Braz. Soc. of Mech. Sci. & Eng. 26(3): 340-348.

Supachai Lakkam, Saiprasit Koetniyom. 2013. Optimization of Constrained Layer Damping for Strain Energy Minimization of Vibrating Pads. Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol. 34(2): 179-187.

Sanjay, K. Mahajan, Eric Denys, Jun-Chul Bae, Tinghui S. Shi and Kee H. Im. 2005. Pad Insulator Modeling for Brake Squeal Analysis. S.A.E. Technical Paper. 2005-01-2314.

Bergman, F., Eriksson, M. and Jacobson, S. 2000. The Effect of Reduced Contact Area on the Occurrence of Disc Brake Squeals for an Automotive Brake Pad. Proceeding sInstn. Mech. Engrs. 214(Part D): 561-568.

Liu, W. and Pfeifer, J. 2000. Reducing High Frequency Disc Brake Squeal by Pad Shape Optimization. S.A.E. Technical Paper. 2000-01-0447.

Cunefare, K. A. and Graf, A. J. 2002. Experimental Active Control of Automotive Disc Brake Rotor Squeal using Dither. Journal of Sound and Vibration. 250(4): 575-590.

Dunlap, K. B., Riehle, M. A. and Longhouse, R. E. 1999. An Investigative Overview of Automotive Disc Brake Noise. S.A.E Technical Paper. 1999-01-0142.

Chen, F. 2007. Disc Brake Squeal: An Overview. S.A.E Technical Paper. 2007-01-0587.

N. Ishihara, M. Nishiwaki, and H. Shimizu. 1996. Experimental Analysis of Low Frequency Brake Squeal Noise. S.A.E Technical Paper. 962128.

J. D. Fieldhouse and W. P. Steel. 2003. A Study of Brake Noise and the Influence of the Center of Pressure at the Disc/Pad Interface, the Coefficient of Friction and Caliper Mounting Geometry. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering. 217(11): 957-974.

Amr, M. Rabia, Nouby, M. Ghazaly, M. M. Salem, Ali, M. Abd-El-Tawwab. 2013. Experimental Studies of Automotive Disc Brake Noise and Vibration: A Review. International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER). 3(1): 199-203.

Munder Fadhil Abdulridha, Muhamad Anuwar Jusoh, Abd Rahim Abu Bakar, Mohamed Ruslan Abdullah. 2015. Reduction of Drum Brake Squeal Noise Using Constrained Layer Damping (CLD). 1st International Conference on Innovation in Science and Technology (IICIST 2015). 20 April 2015. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Shyh-Chin Huang, Chao-Yang Tsai and Chiou-Lin Liou. 2016. A General Vibration Theory for Constrained Layer Damping-treated Thick Sandwich Structures. Journal of Sandwich Structures & Materials. 18(3): 343-373.

JoÄo Diogo Pereira Amorim. 2013. Vibroacoustic Analysis of Plates with Viscoelastic Damping Patches: A Layerwise Theory and the Rayleigh-Ritz Method. Masters Thesis. University of Porto, Porto.

G.R. Tomlinson. 1990. The Use of Constrained Layer Damping in Vibration Control. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 32(3): 233-242.

D. Ross, E. E. Ungar and E. M. Kirwin Jr. 1959. Damping of Plate Flexural Vibration by Means of Viscoelastic Laminate. Structural Damping. ASME, New York.

M. Eriksson. 2002. Friction and Contact Phenomena of Disc Brakes Related to Squeal. Ph.D. Thesis. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis Uppsala, Sweden.

Downloads

Published

2017-12-07

How to Cite

REDUCTION OF DISC BRAKE SQUEAL NOISE USING CONSTRAINED LAYER DAMPERS. (2017). Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 79(7-4). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v79.12269