FABRICATION AND CHARACTERIZATIONS OF GELATIN/CHITOSAN WITH ALOE VERA AND ACHATINA FULICA SP MUCUS AS SCAFFOLD FOR SKIN TISSUE ENGINEERING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v81.12533Keywords:
Scaffold, gelatin, chitosan, Aloe vera, snail mucus, burnsAbstract
Scaffold is a biomaterial widely used in tissue engineering. Scaffold is temporary porous structure which contain extracellular matrix. It serves as scaffolding which is required for cells infiltration and physical support to guide the cell proliferation and differentiation into the targeted functional tissues. Scaffold must be biocompatible, small pore size, flexible and support regenerative application. Aloe vera as natural resource, it has capability in accelerating wound healing, facilitating the inflammation, increasing wound contraction and epithelialization, and increasing organization of the regenerated tissue. Snail mucus (SM) has capability in inhibiting bacterial growth. This study aims to synthesize and characterize a scaffold made of gelatin-chitosan-Aloe vera (AV) - Achatina fulica sp mucus. The method is to synthesize scaffold with its compositions, gelatin-chitosan (1: 1 ratio) which is dissolved into 0.05 M acetic acid, then a variation of Aloe vera (AV) and snail mucus (SM) at 0% AV; 0% SM; 0.07 AV; 0.07 SM; 0.15 AV; 0.15 SM; 0.07 AV; 0.15 SM; 0.15 AV; 0.007 SM were mixed with the chitosan-gelatin solution, then used freeze dry method to obtain porous scaffold. Characterization which performed in this research including Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), porosity test, tensile strength test, swelling test, and degradation test. Based on FTIR test, Aloe vera and snail mucus interacted with free amino and hydroxyl groups of chitosan and gelatin, characterized by absorption bands at 2937.59 cm-1 wave numbers which are symmetrical and asymmetrical stretching of (-CH) .SEM test results obtained pore size of 70 - 235 μm. Porosity test results showed that five scaffolds have porosity value of 87-96%; thus, allowing the process of cell proliferation to occur well. The result of physical characteristic test yielded tensile strength of 1.425 MPa on gelatin-chitosan as control sample and 0.732 MPa for sample with 0.15% AV and 0.15% SM. Swelling test showed a variation of scaffold composition with Aloe vera with Achatina fulica sp’s mucus having a swelling percentage of 200-520%. The degradation test results showed that the whole sample was not depleted for 21 days; thus, giving time for cell regeneration. Sample with 0.15% Aloe vera and 0.07% snail mucus has some potentials as scaffolds for skin tissue in case of burns wound, due to its morfology, porosity, and degradation.
References
Li W. J., Shanti R. M., Tuan R. S. 2006. Electrospinning Technology for Nanofibrous Scafffolds in Tissue Engineering. Nanotechnologies for the Life Sciences, Vol. 9: Tissue, Cell and Organ Engineering. Ed. Kumar C. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Germany. 9: 135-187.
http://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/burns (Accessed on January 2nd 2017, 13: 45).
Moenadjat, Y. 2000. Luka Bakar: Pengetahuan Klinik Praktis. Cetakan I. Farmedia, Jakarta.
Humatcher, D. W. 2001. Scaffold Design and Fabrication Technologies for Engineering Tissues-state of the Art and Future Perspectives. J. Biomater. Sci. Polymer. 12: 107-124.
Hoque, M., Enamul, Tamrin Nuge, Tshai Kim Yeow, Norshariza Nordinand, R. G. S. V. Prasad, 2016. Gelatin Based Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering – A Review. Polymers Research Journal. 9(1): 1935-2530.
Vázquez Martin R, Brenda Vega-Ruiz, Rodrigo Ramos-Zúñiga, Daniel Alexander Saldaña-Koppel, and Luis Fernando Quiñones-Olvera. 2015. Chitosan and Its Potential Use as a Scaffold for Tissue Engineering in Regenerative Medicine. Hindawi Publishing Corporation BioMed Research International. 1-15.
Lee, C. K. 2006. Immunomodulatory Activity. In Y. I. Park, S. K. Lee (Eds.). New Perspectives on Aloe. Springer Science, NY. 155-167.
Otsuka – Futchino. 1993. Morphological Aspect of Achasin Treated Bacteria. J. Comp. Biochem, Physiol. 104C: 37-41.
Dhandayuthapani, B., Yoshida, Y., Maekawa, T., Kumar, D. S. 2011. Polymeric Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering Application: A Review. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 1-19.
O'Brien, F. J., Harley, B. A., Yannas, I. V., Gibson, L. 2005. The Effect of Pore Size on Cell Adhesion in Collagen-GAG Scaffolds. Biomaterials. 26: 433-441.
Freyman, T. M., Yannas, I. V. and Gibson, L. J. 2001. Cellular Materials as Porous Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering. Prog. Mat Sci. 46: 273-82.
Chen Gouping, Takashi Ushida and Tetsuya Tateishi. 2002. Scaffold Design for Tissue Engineering. WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH, Weinheim, Fed. Rep. of Germany.
Kakkar, P. S. Verma, I. Manjubala, B. Madhan. 2014. Development of Keratin-chitosan-gelatin Composite Scaffold for Soft Tissue Engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. 45: 343-347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2014.09.021.
Angulo Daniel Enrique López, Sobral. Paulo José do Amaral. 2016. Characterization of Gelatin/chitosan Scaffold Blended with Aloe Vera and Snail Mucus for Biomedical Purpose. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 92: 645-653.
Sanchez, S. H., Zuniga, R. R., Anda de, L. S., Dellamary, L. F., Castaneda, G. R., Jaimes, R. C., Espinoza, J. G. 2012. A New Bilayer Chitosan Scaffolding as a Dural Substitute: Experimental Evaluation. World Neurosurg. 77(3/4): 577-582.
Sung, H. J., Carson Meredith, Chad Johnson, Zorina, S. Galis. 2004. The Effect of Scaffold Degradation Rate on Three-dimensional Cell Growth and Angiogenesis. Biomaterials. 25: 5735–5742.
Silva, S. S., Caridade, S. G., Mano, J. F., & Reis, R. L. 2013. Effect of Crosslinking in Chitosan/aloe Vera-based Membranes for Biomedical Applications, Carbohydrate. Polymers. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.06.022.
Tan, Q., L. Songgang, J. Ren, Ch. Chen. 2011. Fabrication of Porous Scaffolds with a Controllable Microstructure and Mechanical Properties by Porogen Fusion Technique. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 12(2011): 890-904.
Loh, Q. L., B. Choong. 2013. Three-dimensional Scaffolds’ for Tissue Engineering Applications: Role of Porosity and Pore Size. Tissue Eng.: Part B. 19(6).
Surjushe, A., Vasani, R., Saple, D. G. 2008, Aloe Vera: A Short Review. Indian J. Dermatol. 53: 163-166.
Baruah, A., Bordoloi, M., Baruah, H. P. 2016. Aloe Vera: A Multipurpose Industrial Crop. Indust. Crops Prod. 94: 951-963.
Klein, A. D., Penneys, N. S. 1988. Aloe vera. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 18: 714-720.
Rose Chellan, Jithendra Panneerselvam, Rajam Abraham Merlin, Kalaivani Tambiran, Mandal Asit Baran, 2013. Preparation and characterization of Aloe vera blended Collagen Chitosan Composite Scaffold for Tissue Engineering Applications. Journal of Applied Materials and Interfaces. 5(15): 7291-7298.
Saarai, A., Kasparkova, V., Sedlacek, T., S áha, P. 2011. A Comparative Study of Crosslinked Sodium Alginate/Gelatin Hydrogels for Wound Dressing. Proceeding of the 4th WSEAS International Conference on Energy and Development, Corfu Island, Greece, 14–16 July 2011. 384-389.
O'Brien, F. 2011. Biomaterials and Sca Olds for Tissue Engineering. Materials Today. 14(3).
Evers Lars, H., Dhaval Bhavsarand Peter Maila ̈nder. 2010. The Biology of Burn Injury. Experimental Dermatology. 19: 777-783.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright of articles that appear in Jurnal Teknologi belongs exclusively to Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Penerbit UTM Press). This copyright covers the rights to reproduce the article, including reprints, electronic reproductions, or any other reproductions of similar nature.