Effect of Obstacle on Deflagration to Detonation Transition (DDT) in Closed Pipe or Channel–An Overview

Authors

  • S. Z. Sulaiman Faculty of Chemical and Natural Resources Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, 26300 Kuantan, Pahang
  • R. M. Kasmani Faculty of Petroleum and Renewable Energy Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • A. Mustafa Faculty of Petroleum and Renewable Energy Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • R. Mohsin Gas Technology Centre, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v66.1326

Keywords:

Closed pipe/channel/tube, obstacle, flame acceleration, deflagration to detonation

Abstract

Due to complicated and rapid process, deflagration-to-detonation transition (DDT) becomes one of the major challenges in combustion theory where the exact mechanism is still poorly understood. Theoretically, the presence of obstacle may disturb flame propagation and hence make the DDT predictions more complex. Thus a comprehensive study is required to acknowledge DDT performance precisely. Lacking of information in literature causes the prediction of the transition period is still uncertain. In contrast, appropriate estimation of the DDT event is crucial for explosion safety. Thus, this present paper discusses the effect of obstacle on prediction transition deflagration to detonation event in pipeline system in order to apply an effective protection and safety systems to prevent and mitigate the gas explosion in industries. In addition the effect of bending on flame acceleration and explosion development would also be explored.

 

References

C. Wang, W. Han, J. Ning, and Y. Yang. 2012. High Resolution Numerical Simulation of Methane Explosion in Bend Ducts. Safety Science. 50: 709–717.

V. N. Gamezo, T. Ogawa, and E. S. Oran. 2007. Numerical Simulations of Flame Propagation and DDT in Obstructed Channels Filled With Hydrogen–Air Mixture. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute. 31: 2463–2471.

V. N. Gamezo, T. Ogawa, and E. S. Oran. 2008. Flame Acceleration and DDT in Channels with Obstacles: Effect of Obstacle Spacing. Combustion and Flame. 155: 302–315.

D. Valiev, V. Bychkov, V. y. Akkerman, C. K. Law, and L.-E. Eriksson. 2010. Flame acceleration in Channels with Obstacles in the Deflagration-to-Detonation Transition. Combustion and Flame. 157: 1012–1021.

R. Blanchard, D. Arndt, R. Grätz, M. Poli, and S. Scheider. 2010. Explosions in Closed Pipes Containing Baffles and 90 Degree Bends. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 23: 253–259.

V. Bychkov, D. Valiev, and L.-E. Eriksson. 2008. Physical Mechanism of Ultrafast Flame Acceleration. Physical Review Letters. 101: 164501.

C. J. Brown and G. O. Thomas. 1999. Experimental Studies of Shock-Induced Ignition and Transition to Detonation in Ethylene and Propane Mixtures. Combustion and Flame. 117: 861–870.

K. Chatrathi, J. E. Going, and B. Grandestaff. 2001. Flame Propagation in Industrial Scale Piping. Process Safety Progress. 20: 286–294.

V. Bychkov, V. y. Akkerman, G. Fru, A. Petchenko, and L.-E. Eriksson. 2007. Flame Acceleration in the Early Stages of Burning in Tubes. Combustion and Flame. 150: 263–276.

G. Ciccarelli and S. Dorofeev. 2008. Flame Acceleration and Transition to Detonation in Ducts. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science. 34: 499–550.

G. O. Thomas. 2009. Flame Acceleration and the Development of Detonation in Fuel–Oxygen Mixtures at Elevated Temperatures and Pressures. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 163: 783–794.

D. A. Kessler, V. N. Gamezo, and E. S. Oran. 2010. Simulations of Flame Acceleration and Deflagration-to-Detonation Transitions in Methane–Air Systems. Combustion and Flame. 157: 2063–2077.

C. Guo, C. Wang, S. Xu, and H. Zhang. 2007. Cellular Pattern Evolution in Gaseous Detonation Diffraction in A 90°-Branched Channel. Combustion and Flame. 148: 89–99.

P. A. Urtiew and A. K. Oppenheim. 1966. Experimental Observations of the Transition to Detonation in an Explosive Gas. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences. 295: 13–28.

H. Phylaktou, M. Foley, and G. E. Andrews. 1993. Explosion Enhancement through a 90° Curved Bend. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 6: 21–29.

B. Zhou, A. Sobiesiak, and P. Quan. 2006. Flame Behavior and Flame-Induced Flow in a Closed Rectangular Duct with a 90° Bend. International Journal of Thermal Sciences. 45: 457–474.

G. Thomas, G. Oakley, and R. Bambrey. 2010. An Experimental Study of Flame Acceleration and Deflagration to Detonation Transition in Representative Process Piping. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 88: 75–90.

Downloads

Published

2013-12-19

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

Effect of Obstacle on Deflagration to Detonation Transition (DDT) in Closed Pipe or Channel–An Overview. (2013). Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 66(1). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v66.1326