COMBUSTION PERFORMANCE OF SYNGAS FROM PALM KERNEL SHELL IN A GAS BURNER

Authors

  • Asmadib Yusoff @ Adnan School of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Muhammad Roslan Rahim School of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Mohammad Nazri Mohd. Jaafar School of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia Institute for Vehicle Systems and Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Norazila Othman School of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Mohd Shuisma Mohd Ismail School of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Kamal Arifin School of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Mohd Faizal Hasan School of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v81.13907

Keywords:

Syngas, Palm Kernel Shell (PKS), gasification, combustion, emission

Abstract

Insufficient and various environmental issues of fossil fuels as the current world dominated energy is now becoming a serious global issue. The rapidly increasing demand for alternative energy sources has contributed to the steady growth of renewable energy. Owing to the fact of the abundant presence of palm kernel shell (PKS) as one of palm biomass wastes in South East Asia region, this paper investigates syngas produced from gasified PKS. The investigation is regarding its composition and combustion performance in a gas burner system. It covers emissions analysis, temperature profile and flame length. The produced syngas from downdraft gasifier was burned in the combustion chamber in air-rich and fuel-rich combustion conditions.  From the experiment, the results showed that the oxidation zone temperature of above 750°C for the downdraft gasifier is suitable for producing syngas. Produced syngas can be classified as pure-carbon monoxide (CO) syngas due to 94.9% CO content with no hydrogen (H2) content and low heating value (LHV) of 10.7 MJ/kg. The wall temperature profiles for burnt syngas produced via downdraft gasification was higher with longer pattern at fuel-rich condition, which signified higher energy of syngas produced from downdraft gasifier compared to fluidised bed gasifier.  The associated flame length was also longer at fuel-rich condition. Produced emission of 56 ppm NOX, 37 ppm CO and 1 ppm SO2 can still be considered as acceptable to human.  It can be concluded that syngas produced from PKS shown a high potential to serve as an alternative source of energy due to its high energy content.

References

Samiran, Nor Afzanizam, Mohd Jaafar, Mohammad Nazri, Cheng Tung Chong, and Jo Han Ng. 2015. A Review of Palm Oil Biomass as a Feedstock for Syngas Fuel Technology. Jurnal Teknologi. 72(5): 13-18.

Saidur, Rahman, E. A. Abdelaziz, Ayhan Demirbas, M. S. Hossain, and Saad Mekhilef. 2011. A Review on Biomass as a Fuel for Boilers. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 15(5): 2262-2289.

Sansaniwal, S. K., M. A. Rosen, and S. K. Tyagi. 2017. Global Challenges in the Sustainable Development of Biomass Gasification: An Overview. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 80: 23-43.

Ani, F. N. 2000. Production of Bio-oil from Palm Oil Shell. Jurnal Kejuruteraan. 12: 105-116.

Shuit, Siew Hoong, Kok Tat Tan, KEAT TEONG Lee, and A. H. Kamaruddin. 2009. Oil Palm Biomass as a Sustainable Energy Source: A Malaysian Case Study. Energy. 34(9): 1225-1235.

Abdullah, N., and F. Sulaiman. 2013. The Oil Palm Wastes in Malaysia. In Biomass Now-Sustainable Growth and Use. InTech.

Loh, Soh Kheang. 2017. The Potential of the Malaysian Oil Palm Biomass as a Renewable Energy Source. Energy Conversion and Management. 141: 285-298.

Singh, Ram Sarup, Ashok Pandey, and Edgard Gnansounou, eds. 2016. Biofuels: Production and Future Perspectives. CRC Press.

Ahmad, Anis Atikah, Norfadhila Abdullah Zawawi, Farizul Hafiz Kasim, Abrar Inayat, and Azduwin Khasri. 2016. Assessing the Gasification Performance of Biomass: A Review on Biomass Gasification Process Conditions, Optimization and Economic Evaluation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 53: 1333-1347.

Panwar, N. L., Richa Kothari, and V. V. Tyagi. 2012. Thermo Chemical Conversion of Biomass–eco Friendly Energy Routes. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 16(4): 1801-1816.

Klass, Donal L. 2004. Biomass for Renewable Energy and Fuels. Encyclopedia of Energy. 1(1): 193-212.

Yılmaz, Sebnem, and Hasan Selim. 2013. A Review on the Methods for Biomass to Energy Conversion Systems Design. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 25: 420-430.

DemirbaÅŸ, Ayhan. 2001. Biomass Resource Facilities and Biomass Conversion Processing for Fuels and Chemicals. Energy conversion and Management. 42(11): 1357-1378.

Lan, Weijuan, Guanyi Chen, Xinli Zhu, Xuetao Wang, and Bin Xu. 2015. Progress in Techniques of Biomass Conversion into Syngas. Journal of the Energy Institute. 88(2): 151-156.

Asadullah, Mohammad. 2014. Barriers of Commercial Power Generation Using Biomass Gasification Gas: A Review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 29: 201-215.

Brachi, Paola, Riccardo Chirone, Francesco Miccio, Michele Miccio, Antonio Picarelli, and Giovanna Ruoppolo. 2014. Fluidized Bed Co-gasification of Biomass and Polymeric Wastes for a Flexible End-use of the Syngas: Focus on Bio-Methanol. Fuel. 128: 88-98.

Atnaw, Samson Mekbib, Shaharin Anwar Sulaiman, and Suzana Yusup. 2011. Downdraft Gasification of Oil-Palm Fronds. Trends in Applied Sciences Research. 6(9): 1006.

Daud, Ahmad Amirul Asraf Mohd. 2014. Palm Oil Waste Gasification: the Effect of Operating Temperature for Hydrogen Production. PhD diss., UMP.

Mayerhofer, M., S. Fendt, H. Spliethoff, and M. Gaderer. 2014. Fluidized Bed Gasification of Biomass–in Bed Investigation of Gas and Tar Formation. Fuel. 117: 1248-1255.

Son, Young-Il, Sang Jun Yoon, Yong Ku Kim, and Jae-Goo Lee. 2011. Gasification and Power Generation Characteristics of Woody Biomass Utilizing a Downdraft gasifier. Biomass and Bioenergy. 35(10): 4215-4220.

Erlich, Catharina, and Torsten H. Fransson. 2011. Downdraft Gasification of Pellets Made of Wood, Palm-oil Residues Respective Bagasse: Experimental Study. Applied Energy. 88(3): 899-908.

Sharma, Avdhesh Kr. 2009. Experimental Study on 75 kWth Downdraft (biomass) Gasifier System. Renewable Energy. 34(7): 1726-1733.

Samiran, Nor Afzanizam, Mohammad Nazri Mohd Jaafar, Jo-Han Ng, Su Shiung Lam, and Cheng Tung Chong. 2016. Progress in Biomass Gasification Technique–with Focus on Malaysian Palm Biomass for Syngas Production. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 62: 1047-1062.

Udomsirichakorn, Jakkapong, Prabir Basu, P. Abdul Salam, and Bishnu Acharya. 2013. Effect of CaO on Tar Reforming to Hydrogen-enriched Gas with In-Process CO2 Capture in a Bubbling Fluidized Bed Biomass Steam Gasifier. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 38(34): 14495-14504.

Arromdee, Porametr, and Vladimir I. Kuprianov. 2012. A Comparative Study on Combustion of Sunflower Shells in Bubbling and Swirling Fluidized-bed Combustors with a Cone-shaped Bed. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification. 62: 26-38.

Karatas, Hakan, Hayati Olgun, and Fehmi Akgun. 2013. Experimental Results of Gasification of Cotton Stalk and Hazelnut Shell in a Bubbling Fluidized Bed Gasifier under Air and Steam Atmospheres. Fuel. 112: 494-501.

Alauddin, Zainal Alimuddin Bin Zainal, Pooya Lahijani, Maedeh Mohammadi, and Abdul Rahman Mohamed. 2010. Gasification of Lignocellulosic Biomass in Fluidized Beds for Renewable Energy Development: A Review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 14(9): 2852-2862.

Mom, M., and Shaharin A. Sulaiman. 2013. Downdraft Gasification of Oil Palm Frond: Effects of Temperature and Operation Time. Asian J Sci Res. 6: 197.

Ninduangdee, Pichet, and Vladimir I. Kuprianov. 2014. Combustion of Palm Kernel Shell in a Fluidized Bed: Optimization of Biomass Particle Size and Operating Conditions. Energy Conversion and Management. 85: 800-808.

Ganjehkaviri, Abdolsaeid, Mohammad Nazri Mohd Jaafar, Seyed Ehsan Hosseini, and Anas Basri Musthafa. 2016. Performance Evaluation of Palm Oil-based Biodiesel Combustion in an Oil Burner. Energies. 9(2): 97.

Abdul Malik, Muhammad Syahiran, Ashrul Ishak Mohamad Shaiful, Mohd Shuisma Mohd Ismail, Mohammad Nazri Mohd Jaafar, and Amirah Mohamad Sahar. 2017. Combustion and Emission Characteristics of Coconut-Based Biodiesel in a Liquid Fuel Burner. Energies. 10(4): 458.

Ja’afar, Mohammad Nazri Mohd, Wan Zaidi Wan Omar, Muhammad Roslan Rahim, Ismail Azmi, and Mohd Hisyam Abdullah. 2014. Study on Combustion Performance of Palm Oil Biodiesel Blend. J. Teknol. 69: 127-131.

Shahbaz, M., S. Yusup, M. Y. Naz, S. A. Sulaiman, A. Inayat, and A. Partama. 2017. Fluidization of Palm Kernel Shell, Palm Oil Fronds, and Empty Fruit Bunches in a Swirling Fluidized Bed Gasifier. Particulate Science and Technology. 35(2): 150-157.

Samiran, Nor Afzanizam, Jo-Han Ng, Mohammad Nazri Mohd Jaafar, Agustin Valera-Medina, and Cheng Tung Chong. 2017. Swirl Stability and Emission Characteristics of CO-enriched Syngas/Air Flame in a Premixed Swirl Burner. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 112: 315-326.

Ghenai, Chaouki. 2015. Combustion and Emissions Performance of Syngas Fuels Derived from Palm Kernel Shell and Polyethylene (PE) Waste via Catalytic Steam Gasification. Combustion. 1: 61291.

Rahim, Muhammad Roslan, and Mohammad Nazri Mohd Jaafar. 2017. Kesan Sudut Pusaran Terhadap Pembentukan Emisi Menggunakan DwI Pemusar Udara Aliran Jejarian. Jurnal Teknologi. 79(2): 137-146.

Downloads

Published

2019-09-23

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

COMBUSTION PERFORMANCE OF SYNGAS FROM PALM KERNEL SHELL IN A GAS BURNER. (2019). Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 81(6). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v81.13907