MICROSTRUCTURAL INVESTIGATION AND STRENGTH PROPERTIES OF CLAY STABILIZED WITH CEMENT, RICE HUSK ASH AND PROMOTER

Authors

  • Mustapha Mohammed Alhaji Department of Civil Engineering, Federal University of Technology, PMB 65 Minna, Nigeria
  • Musa Alhassan Department of Civil Engineering, Federal University of Technology, PMB 65 Minna, Nigeria
  • Taiye Waheed Adejumo Department of Civil Engineering, Federal University of Technology, PMB 65 Minna, Nigeria
  • Ayuba Ibrahim Dogo Department of Civil Engineering, Federal University of Technology, PMB 65 Minna, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v82.14353

Keywords:

Cement based clay, Microstructure, Promoter, Rice husk ash, Stabilization

Abstract

A clay soil, classified as Clay of High plasticity (CH) according to Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) was stabilized with cement, Rice Husk Ash (RHA) and promoter. The mineralogy of the clay soil and the morphology of the clay and clay specimens admixed with varied composition of cement, RHA and promoter were evaluated in order to determine effect of the RHA on promoter stabilization of cement based clay soil. The promoter used in this study consists of calcium chloride and sodium hydroxide in the ratio of 1:1. The clay was remolded at standard Proctor compaction energy and the specimens were mixed with 0, 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0% cement, admixed with 1.0, 2.0, 3.0% RHA each, and 0.3, 0.6, 1.0% promoter each. The molded specimens were cured for 1, 7, 14, 28, 60 and 90days before testing for Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS) and consequently the modulus of elasticity. The UCS of specimens without cement increased from 20 kN/m2 for the natural clay soil to 95 kN/m2 on addition of 3% RHA and 1.0% promoter after 28 days of curing, representing 475% increase in the UCS. This increase was confirmed by morphology of the clay soil mixed with RHA and promoter only, which showed presence of calcium silicate hydrate. Addition of 3.0% cement with 3 and 1.0% RHA and promoter respectively, increased the UCS from 220 to 375kN/m2 after 28 days of curing, which was also confirmed by the morphology of the specimens. The highest elastic modulus of 48.3 MPa was observed at specimens containing 3% cement, 3% RHA and 1.0% promoter.   

Author Biography

  • Mustapha Mohammed Alhaji, Department of Civil Engineering, Federal University of Technology, PMB 65 Minna, Nigeria
    Associate Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Federal University of Technology, Minna

References

Osinubi, K. J. 1999. Evaluation of Admixture stabilization of Nigeria Black Cotton Soil. Nigeria Society of Engineers (NSE) Technical Transaction. 34(3): 88-96.

Tsuchida, T. and Tang, Y. X. 2015. Estimation of Compressive Strength of Cement-treated Marine Clays with Different Initial Water Contents. Soils and Foundations. 55(2): 359-374.

Osinubi, K. J. and Mustapha A. M. 2009. Optimal Use of Bagasse Ash on Cement Stabilized Laterite. NSE Technical Transactions, Nigerian Society of Engineers. 44(1): 1-16.

Osinubi, K. J. and Alhassan M. 2008. Use of Lime and Bagasse Ash in the Modification of Laterite. Nigerian Journal of Engineering. 14(1): 70-80.

Mosa, A. M., Banyhussan, Q. S. and Yousif, R. A. 2017. Improvement of Expansive Soils used in Earth Works of Highways and Rail Roads using Cement Kiln Dust. Journal of Advanced Civil Engineering Practice and Research. 4: 13-24.

Bahmed, I. T., Harichane, K., Ghrici, M., Boukhatem, B., Rebouh, R. and Gadouri, H. 2017. Prediction of Geotechnical Properties of Clayey Soils Stabilized with lime Using Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs). International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. 1-13.

Samanta, M. 2018. Investigation on Geomechanical Behavior and Microstructure of Cement-Stabilized Fly Ash. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. 12(5): 449-461.

Malik, V. and Priyadarshee, A. 2018. Compaction and Swelling Behavior of Black Cotton Soil Mixed with Different Non-cementitious Materials. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. 12(4): 413-419.

Vichan, S. and Rachan, R. 2013. Chemical Stabilization of Soft Bangkok Clay using the Blend of Calcium Carbide Residue and Biomass Ash. Soils and Foundations. 53(2): 272-281.

Horpibulsuk, S., Phetchuay, C., Chinkulkijniwat, A. and Cholaphatsom, A. 2013. Strength Development in Silty Clay Stabilized with Calcium Carbide Residue and Fly Ash. Soils and Foundations. 53(4): 477-486.

Gullu, H. 2014. Factorial Experimental Approach for Effective Dosage Rate of Stabilizer: Application for Fine-grained Soil Treated with Bottom Ash. Soils and Foundations. 54(3): 462-477.

Mangi S. A., Ibrahim, M. H. W., Jamaluddin N., Arshad, M. F., Jaya, R. P. 2019. Short-Term Effects of Sulphate and Chloride on the Concrete containing Coal Bottom Ash as Supplementary Cementatious Material, Engineering Science and Technology an International Conference. 22: 515-522.

Demir. I., Guzelkucuk, S., Sevim, O. 2018. Effect of Suphate and Cement Mortar with Hybrid Pozzolan Substitution, Engineering Science and Technology, An International Journal. 21: 275-283.

Thakare, S. W. and Chauhan, P. 2016. Stabilization of Expansive Soil with Micro-silica Lime and Fly Ash for Pavement. International Journal of Engineering Research. 5(1): 9-13.

Zhao, H., Ge, L., Petry, T. M. and Sun, Y. 2014. Effect of Chemical Stabilizers on an Expansive Clay. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering. 18(4): 1009-1017.

Du, Y., Jiang, N., Liu, S., Horpibulsuk, S. and Arulrajah, A. 2016. Field Evaluation of Soft Highway Subgrade Soil Stabilized with Calcium Carbide Residue. Soils and Foundations. 56(2): 301-314.

Abdullah, H. H., Shahin, M. A., and Sarker, P. 2017. Stabilization of Clay with Fly-Ash Geopolymer Incoporating GGBFS. Proceedings of the Second World Congress on Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering (CSEE 17). Barcelona, Spain, ICGRE141-1 – ICGRE141-8.

Changizi, F. and Haddad, A. 2017. Effect of Nanocomposite on the Strength Parameters of Soil. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering. 21(3): 676-686.

Yoobanpot, N., Jamsawang P. and Horpibulsuk S. 2017. Strength Behavior and Microstructural Characteristics of Soft Clay Stabilized with Cement, Kiln Dust and Fly Ash Residue. Applied Clay Science. 141: 146-156.

Yoobanpot N. and Jamsawang P. 2014. Effect of Cement Replacement by Rice Husk Ash on Soft Soil Stabilization. Kasetsart Journal of Natural Science. 48: 323-332.

Prasad, D., Borthakur, N. and Das, S. 2017. Effect of Rice Husk Ash and Cement Mixtures on Engineering Properties of Cohesive Soil. Workshop on Sustanable Geotechnics, IGS Kanpur Chapter, IIT Kampur, India. 1-4.

Al-Swaidani A. Hammoud I. and Meziab A. 2016. Effect of Adding Natural Pozzollana on Geotechnical Properties of Lime-Stabilized Clay Soil. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. 8: 714-725.

Anupam, A. K., Kumar, P. Ransmchung, G. D. 2016. Effect of Fly Ash and Rice Husk Ash on Permanent Deformation Behavior of Subgrade Soil under Cyclic Triaxial Loading. 11th Transportation Research Proceedia. 17: 596-606.

Kumar, J. S. and Sharma, N. 2017. Effect of Rice Husk Ash and RBI Grade 81 on Geotechnical Properties of Clayey Soil. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology. 9(30): 119-129.

Xiao, H., Zhang, F., Liu, R., Zhang, R., Liu, Z. and Liu, H. 2019. Effect of Pozzolanic and Non-Pozzolanic Nanomaterials on Cement-Based Materials. Construction and Building Materials. 213: 1-9.

Moayedi, H., Huat, B. B. K., Moayedi, F., Asadi, A. Parsaie, A. 2011. Effect of Sodium Silicate on Unconfined Compressive Strength of Soft Clay. Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. 16(Bundle C): 289-295.

Kermani M., Hassani F. P., Aflaki, E., Benzaazoua, M. and Nokken, M. 2015. Evaluation of the Effect of Sodium Silicate Addition to Mine Backfill, Gelfill – Part 1. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. 7: 266-272.

Cong, M., Longzhu, C. and Bing, C. 2014. Analysis of Strength Development in Soft Clay Stabilized with Cement-Based Stabilizer. Construction and Building Materials. 71: 354-362.

Ma, C., Qin, Z., Zhuang, Y., Chen, L. and Chen, B. 2015. Influence of Sodium Silicate and Promoters on Unconfined Compressive Strength of Portland Cement-Stabilized Clay. Soils and Foundations. 55(5): 1222-1232.

Ma, C., Longzhu, C. and Bing, C. 2016. Experimental Study on Soft Clay Stabilized with Cement-based Stabilizer. 15th Asian Regional Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. 2043-2046.

Ma, C., Bing, C. and Longzhu, C. 2018. Experimental Feasibility Research on a High-efficiency Cement-based Clay Stabilizer. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering. 22(1): 62-72.

Du, C., Yang, G. Zhang, T. and Yang, Q. 2019. Multiscale Study of the Influence of Promoters on Low-Plasticity Clay Stabilized with Cement-based Composites. Construction and Building Materials. 537-548.

BS 1377. 1992. Methods of Testing Soils for Civil Engineering Purposes. British Standard Institute, London.

BS 5930. 1981. Code of Practice for Site Investigations, British Standards Institution, London.

Zhang, M., Guo, H., El-Korchi, T., Zhang, G. and Tao, M. 2013. Experimental Feasibiity Study of Geopolymer as the Next-generation Soil Stabilizer. Construction and Building Materials. 47: 1468-1478.

Jaiswal, M. and Lai, B. 2016. Impact of Rice Husk Ash on Soil Stability (Including Micro Level Investigation). Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 9(30): 1-7.

James, J. and Pandian, P. K. 2018. Strength and Microstructure of Micro Ceramic Dust Admixed Lime Stabilized Soil, Revista de La Construccion. 17(1): 5-22.

Cong, M., Bing, C., and Longzhu, C. 2018. Experimental Feasibility Research on a High-efficiency Cement-Based Clay Stabilizer. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering. 22(1): 62-72.

Downloads

Published

2020-07-20

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

MICROSTRUCTURAL INVESTIGATION AND STRENGTH PROPERTIES OF CLAY STABILIZED WITH CEMENT, RICE HUSK ASH AND PROMOTER. (2020). Jurnal Teknologi, 82(5). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v82.14353