Review of Percent Time Spent Following (PTSF) as Performance Measure for Two-lane Highways

Authors

  • Muttaka Na'iya Ibrahim Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Othman Che Puan Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Mushairry Mustaffar Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v64.1485

Keywords:

Two-lane highways, HCM, platooning, PTSF, service measure

Abstract

The Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) uses Percent Time Spent Following (PTSF) as key service measure for assessing the level of service of two-lane highways. However, the indicator is difficult to measure directly in the field. For this reason, its estimation to date has been based on analytical procedures using equations derived from simulations and field observations at representative location based on surrogate measure; as the percent of vehicles traveling with headway less than 3 seconds (3 s). Findings from empirical studies confirmed that the HCM analytical procedures used in estimating PTSF yield results that are inconsistent with the 3 s surrogate measure and mostly overestimate the indicator. This paper presents a review on the estimation of PTSF on two-lane highways and suggests probable approach to substantiate the application of the current practice. Further, the authors of this paper argued that the use of 3 s as surrogate for estimating PTSF based on field observation at a specific point may not represent the actual time spent following over a long segment of two-lane highway since PTSF is space related measure. Hence, the authors suggest the use of test vehicle approach over the highway segment to be evaluated to identify the variables that are required for the development of a representative PTSF measurement model. It is expected that this review and suggestion offered will contribute in advancing performance analysis of two-lane highways.

 

Author Biographies

  • Muttaka Na'iya Ibrahim, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
    DEPARTMENT OF GEOTECHNICS & TRANSPORTATION, FACULTY OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA, RESEARCH STUDENT.
  • Othman Che Puan, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
    DEPARTMENT OF GEOTECHNICS & TRANSPORTATION, FACULTY OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA, Associate Professor.
  • Mushairry Mustaffar, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
    FACULTY OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA, Associate Professor.

References

Al-Kaisy, A. and S. Karjala. 2010. Car-Following Interaction and the Definition of Free-Moving Vehicles on Two-Lane Rural Highways. Journal of Transportation Engineering, ASCE. 136(10): 925–931.

Al-Kaisy, A. and C. Durbin. 2011. Platooning on Two-lane Two-way Highways: An Empirical Investigation. in 6th International Symposium on Highway Capacity and Quality of Service. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. Stockholm, Sweden:

Vogel, K. 2002. What Characterizes a "Free Vehicle" in an Urban Area? Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. 5(1): 15–29.

TRB, 2000. Highway Capacity Manual. 4th Ed. National Research Council, Washington, D.C.

TRB, 2010. Highway Capacity Manual. 5th Ed. National Research Council, Washington, D.C.

Polus, A. and M. Cohen. 2011. Estimating Percent-time-spent-following on Two-lane Rural Highways. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. 19(6): 1319–1325.

Romana, G.M. and I. Pérez. 2006. Measures of Effectiveness for Level-of-Service Assessment of Two-Lane Roads: An Alternative Proposal Using a Threshold Speed. Transportation Research Record. 1988(1): 56–62.

Van As, S.C. and A. Van Niekerk. 2004. The Operational Analysis of Two-lane Rural Highways. in 23rd Annual Southern African Transport Conference. Pretoria, South Africa.

Al-Kaisy, A. and C. Durbin. 2008. Evaluating New Methodologies for Estimating Performance on Two-lane Highways. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering. NRC Research Press. 35(8): 777–785.

Luttinen, R.T. 1996. Statistical Analysis of Vehicle Time Headways. Helsinki University of Technology. Transportation Engineering, Publication. 87: 193.

Al-Kaisy, A. and C. Durbin. 2007. Estimating Percent Time Spent Following on Two-lane Highways: Field Evaluation of New Methodologies, in Presented at the Transportation Research Board 86th Annual Meeting, January 21-25. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.

Dixon, M. P., S. S. K. Sarepali, and K. A. Young. 2002. Field Evaluation of Highway Capacity Manual 2000 Analysis Procedures for Two-Lane Highways. Transportation Research Record: Transportation Research Board. National Research Council, Washington, D.C. 1802(2002): 125–132.

Harwood, D. W. et al. 2003. Two-lane Road Analysis Methodology in the Highway Capacity Manual. In NCHRP Project 20-7(160) Washington, D.C.

Luttinen, R. T. 2001. Capacity and Level of Service on Finnish Two-Lane Highways, in Helsinki 2001, Finnish Road Administration, Traffic and Road Engineering, Finnra Reports 18/2001: Helsinki, Finland.

Polus, A. and M. Cohen. 2009. Theoretical and Empirical Relationships for the Quality of Flow and for a New Level of Service on Two-Lane Highways. Journal of Transportation Engineering, ASCE. 135(6): 380–385.

Rozenshtein, S., A. Polus, and M. Cohen. 2012. Models for Estimating Drivers Following on Two-Lane Rural Highways. Transportation Research Record. Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2286(-1): 68–75.

Saha, P., M. Pal, and A. Sarkar. 2012. Study on Percent Time Spent Following, in Advances in Civil Engineering and Building Materials, CRC Press. 899–902.

Van As, C. and A. Van Niekerk. 2007. South African Highway Capacity Research, in TRB Workshop 153. South African National Roads Agency, Limited.

Al-Kaisy, A. and S. Karjala. 2008. Indicators of Performance on Two-Lane Rural Highways: Empirical Investigation. Transportation Research Record. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council. Washington, D.C. 2071(1): 87–97.

Luttinen, R. T. 2001. Percent Time-Spent-Following as Performance Measure for Two-Lane Highways. Transportation Research Record. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council. Washington, D.C. 1776: 52–59.

HRB. 1950. Highway Capacity Manual. National Research Council. Washington, DC.

HRB. 1965. Highway Capacity Manual, HRB Special Report 87. Washington, DC.

TRB. 1985. Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209. Washington, DC.

McLean, J. R. 1989. Two-lane Highways Traffic Operations: Theory and Practice. New York: Gordon and Breach Publishers.

Guell, D. L. and M. R. Virkler. 1988. Capacity Analysis of Two-lane Highways. Transportation Research Record. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies. Washington, D.C. 1194: 199–205.

Johnson. G. P. 1985. Highway Capacity Manual Misses Mark on Rural Highway Capacity. in Compendium of Technical Papers, Institute of Transportation Engineers 65th Annual Meeting. Denver, CO Institute of Transportation Engineers.

Krumins, I. and TAC. 1991. Two-lane Highway Capacity and Level of Service Research Project: Phase III Final Report. Ottawa, Ont. Transportation Association of Canada.

Luttinen, R. T. 1992. Statistical Properties of Vehicle Time Headways. Transportation Research Record: Transportation Research Board. National Research Council, Washington, D. C. 1365: 92–98.

Persula, M. 1995. Approximation of Percent Time Delay with Local Measurements. Traffic Operations: Highway Capacity. Transportation Research Record. National Research Council, Washington, D.C. 1484: 58–65.

Harwood, D.W., et al. 1999. Capacity and Quality of Service of Two-Lane Highways, in Final Report, NCHRP Project 3-55(3). Midwest Research Institute, University of California, Barkeley.

Al-Ghamdi, A. 2001. Analysis of Time Headways on Urban Roads: Case Study from Riyadh. Journal of Transportation Engineering. 127(4): 289–294.

MOWM. 2011. Malaysian Highway Capacity Manual. Highway Planning Unit, Ministry of Works, Malaysia.

Othman, C. P. 2004. Drivers's Car Following Headway on Single Carriageway Roads. Jurnal Kejuruteraan Awam. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. 16(2): 15–27.

Van As, C. 2003. The Development of an Analysis Method for the Determination of Level of Service of Two-lane Undivided Highways in South Africa. Project Summary, South African National Roads Agency, Limited.

Catbagan, J. L. and H. Nakamura. 2006. Evaluation of Performance Measures for Two-lane Expressways in Japan. Transportation Research Record, Transportation Research Board. National Research Council, Washington, DC. 1988: 111–118.

Hashim, I. H. and T. A. Abdel-Wahed. 2011. Evaluation of performance measures for rural two-lane roads in Egypt. Alexandria Engineering Journal. 50(3): 245–255.

Al-Kaisy, A. and Z. Freedman. 2010. Estimating Performance on Two-Lane Highways: Case Study Validation of a New Methodology. Transportation Research Record. Journal of the Transportation Research Board. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. 2173(1): 72–79.

Brilon, W. and F. Weiser. 2006. Two-lane Rural Highways: The German Experience. Transportation Research Record, Transportation Research Board. National Research Council, Washington, DC. 1988: p. 38-47.

Shawky, M. and I. Hashim. 2010. Impact of Horizontal Alignment on Traffic Performance at Rural Two-lane Highways, in Proceedings of 4th International Symposium on Highway Geometric Design. Valencia, Spain.

Downloads

Published

2013-09-09

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

Review of Percent Time Spent Following (PTSF) as Performance Measure for Two-lane Highways. (2013). Jurnal Teknologi, 64(1). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v64.1485