Assessing Engineering Students’ Practical Intelligence as the Outcome of Performing ‘hands-on’ Laboratory Classes

Authors

  • Zol Bahri Razali School of Mechatronics Eng., Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Pauh Putra Campus, 02600 Arau, Perlis, Malaysia
  • James Trevelyan School of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Western Australia 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Perth, WA 6009

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v64.1561

Keywords:

Experience, practical intelligence, unintentional learning, hands-on, engineering laboratory

Abstract

Experience in an engineering laboratory is important for engineering students and expected to enhance understanding of engineering concepts for which they have learned the theory. Although the aim of the laboratory is an opportunity to learn and gain experience or practical intelligence (PI), the authors do not know much about what actually happens in a typical laboratory class. The development of practical intelligence is expected to be happened when students are performing tasks in the laboratory exercises and they may possibly be able to detect and solve problems or diagnose faults in similar equipment. Thus the purpose of this study is to assess students’ practical intelligence as the outcome of performing laboratory exercises and relating to the ability to diagnose equipment faults. Comparison of novel-expert rating approach is used in this study. The findings demonstrated that practical intelligence can be measured by calculating the difference between students’ ratings and the experts’ ratings.

 

Author Biography

  • Zol Bahri Razali, School of Mechatronics Eng., Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Pauh Putra Campus, 02600 Arau, Perlis, Malaysia
    Senior Lecturer,
    School of Mechatronics Engineering
    Universityi Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP)
    Pauh Putra Campus, 02600 Arau, PERLIS

References

Christiansen, F. V. and C. Rump. 2007. European Journal of Engineering Education. 32(4): 467.

Feisel, L. D. and A. J. Rosa. 2005. Journal of Engineering Education. 94(1).

Kolb, D. A. 1984. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Lindsay, E. and M. Good. 2005. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Education. 48(4): 619.

Polanyi, M. 1966. The Tacit Dimension. Doubleday, Garden City.

Razali, Z. B. & Trevelyan, J. P. 2007. Experience in Laboratory and the Ability to Diagnose Equipment Faults. RCEE2007, Johor, Malaysia.

Razali, Z. B. & Trevelyan, J. P. 2008. Can Practical Intelligence from a Laboratory Experience be Measured? AAEE2008 Annual Conference, Yepoon, Queensland.

Schmidt, F .L. and J. E. Hunter. 1993. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 1: 8.

Somech, A. and B. Ronit. 1999. Journal of Psychology. 133(6): 605.

Sternberg, R .J. and R. K. Wagner. 1993. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2(1): 1.

Sternberg, R. J. 1995. American Psychologist. 50(11): 912.

Wagner, R. K. and R. J. Sternberg. 1985. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 49: 436.

Webb, A. 2003. Unpublished Undergraduate Thesis. The University of Western Australia. Perth.

Downloads

Published

2013-09-18

Issue

Section

Social Sciences

How to Cite

Assessing Engineering Students’ Practical Intelligence as the Outcome of Performing ‘hands-on’ Laboratory Classes. (2013). Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 64(1). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v64.1561