Pengaruh Rakan Sebaya ke atas Tingkah Laku Hedonistik Belia IPT di Malaysia

Authors

  • Siti Raba'ah Hamzah Fakulti Pengajian Pendidikan, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400, UPM, Serdang, Malaysia
  • Turiman Suandi Fakulti Pengajian Pendidikan, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400, UPM, Serdang, Malaysia
  • Azimi Hamzah Fakulti Pengajian Pendidikan, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400, UPM, Serdang, Malaysia
  • Ezhar Tamam Fakulti Bahasa Moden dan Komunikasi, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400, UPM, Serdang, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v63.1656

Keywords:

Tingkah laku hedonistik, keakraban rakan sebaya, komunikasi, pengasingan, kepercayaan

Abstract

Kajian ini meneliti sejauh mana rakan sebaya mempengaruhi tingkah laku hedonistik belia di institusi pengajan tinggi (IPT) terpilih di Malaysia. Kajian ex post facto ini melibatkan 394 pelajar institut pengajian tinggi di sekitar Lembah Klang. Data telah dikumpul melalui borang soal selidik tadbir sendiri yang telah diadaptasi daripada Armsden dan Greenberg (1987), dan Zimbardo dan Boyd (1999) serta Schwartz (1992) bagi mengukur tahap keakraban dengan rakan sebaya dan tingkah laku hedonistik. Analisis deskriptif dan inferensi dijalankan dengan menggunakan perisian SPSS dan Amos (SEM). Hasil kajian menunjukkan responden (67.0%) mempunyai tahap tingkah laku hedonistik yang sederhana (M = 3.25, SD = 0.56). Kajian juga mendapati bahawa keakraban dengan rakan sebaya mempunyai hubungan positif dan signifikan dengan tingkah laku hedonistik melalui dimensi pengasingan (β = .204, C.R = 2.972, Sig = .003). Seterusnya, hasil kajian menunjukkan dimensi kepercayaan (β = -.034, C.R = -.551, Sig = .582) dan dimensi komunikasi (β = .281, C.R = 1.597, Sig = .751) tidak mempunyai pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap tingkah laku hedonistik. Hasil kajian mampu memberi sumbangan yang penting dan signifikan ke arah usaha yang lebih strategik bagi membendung penularan tingkah laku hedonistik dan seterusnya memperkasakan sahsiah belia IPT di Malaysia.


References

Albert, D., & Steinberg, L. 2011. Peer Influences on Adolescent Risk Behavior. In M. T. Bardo, D. H. Fishbein, & R. Milich (Eds.). Inhibitory Control and Drug Abuse Prevention: From Research to Translation. New York: Springer.

Andersson, J. 2011. Vauxhall’s Post-industrial Pleasure Gardens: ‘Death Wish’ and Hedonism In 21st-Century London. Urban Studies. 48: 85–100. doi:10.1177/0042098009360238.

Armsden, G. C., & Greenberg, M. T. 1987. The Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment: Individual Differences and Their Relationships to Psychological Well-Being in Adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 16: 427–454. doi: 10.1007/BF02202939.

Bahaman, A. S., & Turiman, S. 1999. Statistic for Social Research with Computer Application. Serdang: Universiti Putra Malaysia Press.

Bandura, A. 1977. Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Bowlby, J. 1982. Attachment and loss. Vol. 1: Attachment. 2nd Ed. New York: Basic Books.

Brechwald, W. A. & Prinstein, M. J. 2011. Beyond Homophily: A Decade of Advances in Understanding Peer Influence Processes. Journal of Research on Adolescence. 21(1): 166–179. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7795. 2010.00721.x.

Bronfenbrenner, U. 1989. Ecological Systems Theory. In: R. Vasta (Eds). Six Theories of Child Development: Revised Formulations and Current Issues (187-250). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Brown, B. B., Bakken, J. P., Ameringer, S. W., & Mahon, M. D. 2008. A Comprehensive Conceptualization of the Peer Influence Process in Adolescence. In M. J. Prinstein and K. A. Dodge (Eds.) Understanding Peer Influence in Children and Adolescents. Duke Series in Child Development and Public Policy. New York: Guildford Publications.

Chaplin, L. N. & John, D. R. 2010. Interpersonal Influences on Adolescent Materialism: A New Look at the Role of Parents and Peers. Journal of Consumer Psychology. 20: 176–184.

Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., & Pachan, M. 2010. A Meta-analysis of After-school Programs that Seek to Promote Personal and Social Skills in Children and Adolescents. American Journal of Community Psychology. 45(3–4): 294–309.

Feldman, F. 2008. Whole Life Satisfaction Concepts of Happiness. Theoria. 74(3): 219–238.

Glaser, B., Shelton, H. K., & Bree, M. 2010. The Moderating Role of Close Friends in the Relationship Between Conduct Problems and Adolescent Substance Use. Journal of Adolescent Health. 47: 35–42. http://dx.doi.org /10.1016/j.jadohealth. 2009.12. 022.

Gonzales, N. & Dodge, K. A. 2009. Family and Peer Influences on Adolescent Behavior and Risk-taking. Paper Presented at the Workshop on Social and Environmental Influences and Adolescent Risk Behavior; Washington, DC: National Academies.

Hair, J. F. J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. & Anderson, R. E. 2010. Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th ed. Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Hooper, L. M & Newman, C. R. 2011. Exploring the Relations Between Parent Depressive Symptoms, Family Religious Involvement, and Adolescent Depressive Symptoms: A Test of Moderation. Counseling and Values. 55(2): 210–227. doi:10.1002/j.2161-007X.2011.tb00033.x.

Itafarida, S. 2008. The Impact of Sociocultural Changeson the Youth?s Achievement Orientation in Fitzgerald?s The Beautiful and Damned. k@ta. 10(2): 146–153. Muat turun 12 Ogos 2012 http://www.citeulike .org/user/ d_van_h/author/ Itafarida.

Jas Laile Suzana Jaafar. 2008. Pengenalan Kepada Psikologi Kanak-Kanak dan Belia. Shah Alam: Arah Pendidikan Sdn. Bhd.

Kandel, D. B. 1978. Homophily, Selection and Socialization in Adolescent Friendships. Am. J. Sociol. 84: 427–436.

Kiesner, J. & Poulin, F. & Dishion, T. J. 2010. Adolescent Substance Use with Friends: Moderating And Mediating Effects Of Parental Monitoring And Peer Activity Contexts. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly. 56(4): 529–556. Wayne State University Press. Retrieved January 4, 2012, from Project MUSE database.

Kupersmidt J. B. &. Dodge K. A. 2004. Children's Peer Relations: From Development to Intervention. (Eds.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.

Laible, D. 2007. Attachment with Parents and Peers in Late Adolescence: Links with Emotional Competence and Social Behavior. Personality and Individual Differences. 43: 1185–1197.

Mohamad Johdi Salleh, Azimah Mohamed, Hamdan Mohamed & Ade Sukma Kamarudin. 2011. Peer Influences in Academic Achievements and Behaviours among Students of MARA Junior Science College, Malaysia. Seminar Kebangsaan Kaunseling Silang Budaya. Kaunseling Merentas Kepelbagaian Budaya Membentuk 1-Malaysia. Organier: PERKAMA–Persatuan Kaunseling Malaysia dan Universiti Malaysia Sarawak. 24–25 May 2011. Kota Samarahan: Central for Teaching Facilities, UNIMAS Sarawak.

Mrug, S., & Windle, M. 2009. Moderators of Negative Peer Influence on Early Adolescent Externalizing Behaviors: The Roles of Individual Behavior, Parenting, and School Connectedness. Journal of Early Adolescence. 29: 518–540.

Piaget, J. 1965. The Moral Judgment of the Child. Translated by T. A. Brown and C. E. Kaegi. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.

Salzinger, S., Feldman, R. S., Rosario, M. & Ng-Mak, D. S. 2010. Role of Parent and Peer Relationships and Individual Characteristics in Middle School Children's Behavioral Outcomes in the Face of Community Violence. Journal of Research on Adolescence. 21(2): 395–407.doi:10.1111/j.532-795.2010.00677.x.

Schwartz, S. H. 1992. Universals in The Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.). Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 25: 1–65. Orlando, FL:Academic Press.

Steinberg, L., & Monahan, K. C. 2007. Age Differences in Resistance to Peer Influence. Developmental Psychology. 43(6): 1531–1543. doi: 10.1037/ 0012-1649.43.6.1531.

Tajima, E. A., Herrenkohl, T. I., Moylan, C. A., & Derr, A. S. 2010. Moderating the Effects of Childhood Exposure to Intimate Partner Violence: The roles of Parenting Characteristics and Adolescent Peer Support. Journal of Research on Adolescence. 21(2): 376–394. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7795. 2010.00676.x.

Thorpe, H. 2012. Sex, Drugs and Snowboarding: Legitimate Definitions of Taste and Lifestyle in a Physical Youth Culture. Leisure Studies. 31(1): 33–51. doi:10.1080/02614367.2011.596556.

Tomé, G., Matos, M. G., Simões, C., Camacho, I., & Diniz, J. A. 2012. How Can Peer Group Influence the Behavior of Adolescents: Explanatory Model. Global Journal of Health Science. 4(2): 26–35. doi:10.5539/ gjhs. V 4n2p26.

Veenhoven, R. 2003. Hedonism and Happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies. 4(4): 437–457.

Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two Conceptions of Happiness: Contrasts of Personal Expressiveness (Eudaimonia) and Hedonic Enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 64(4): 678–691.

Zaharah Ghazali. 2010. The Influence of Socialization Agents and Demographic Profiles on Brand Consciousness. International Journal of Management and Marketing Research. 4(1): 19–29.

Zahrt, D. M. & Lange, M. D. 2011. Aggressive Behavior in Children and Adolescents. Pediatrics in Review. 32, 325, doi: 10.1542/pir.32-8-325.

Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd J. N. 1999. Putting Time in Perspective: A Valid, Reliable, Individual-differences Metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 77: 1271–1288.

Downloads

Published

2013-07-29

Issue

Section

Social Sciences

How to Cite

Pengaruh Rakan Sebaya ke atas Tingkah Laku Hedonistik Belia IPT di Malaysia. (2013). Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 63(1). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v63.1656