The Impact of Concurrent Engineering Strategy on New Compex Product Development Process in Organization: An Empirical Study of Manufacturing and Service Industry in Malaysia

Authors

  • Amran Rasli Faculty of Management, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor
  • Saif ur Rehman Khan Faculty of Management, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor
  • Tan Owee Kowang Faculty of Management, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v61.1681

Keywords:

Concurrent engineering, new product development, customer satisfaction

Abstract

Taking into account the customers, supplier and organization involvement in the new product development (NPD), this article focuses on the synthesis, evaluation, and selection of various sub-factors of concurrent engineering involved in new product development process. The aim of this study was to provide the reliability and validity of six sub-factors of concurrent engineering model of the 49-item questionnaire and to analyze its association with concurrent engineering and new product development process in a sample of 35 manufacturing and services organization located in Johor, Malaysia. Methods: A self reported survey was conducted in 35 manufacturing and services organization located in Johor, Malaysia. Results: Appropriate internal consistencies of the six sub-scales: customers relationship, team development, continuity, tools and techniques, suppliers involvement and corporate focus and their association with concurrent engineering, were obtained. Zero-order correlation and regressions analysis replicated the theoretically assumed structure of the effective concurrent engineering (ECE). Evidence of criterion validity was obtained from cross-correlations of the scales and from their linear and multiple regression analysis. Finally, all seven scales were associated with a highly significant ratio of concurrent engineering as predicted by fundamental theory. Conclusion: Based on the results of this study the seven version of the model, questionnaire is considered a reliable and valid instrument for measuring association in developing the new complex product development process.

References

Ainscough, Matthew, Ncailcy, Kevin, and Tennant, Charles (2003). A self assessment tool for implementing concurrent engineering through change management. International Journal of Project Management. 21(1): 425–431.

Balachandran, R., and Friar, John H. 1999. Managing New Product Development Processes the Right Way. Information, Knowledge, Systems Management. 4(2):33–42.

Boyle, Todd A., Kumar, Uma, and Kumar, Vinod. 2003. Determinants of the Diffusion of Cross-functional New Product Development Teams. Proceedings of ASAC. 24(7):52–60.

Brown A., Soutar G.A. and Huang X. 2004. Measuring New Product Success: An Empirical Investigation of Australian SMEs. Industrial Marketing Management. 33(5):117–123.

Cicmil, Svetlana J. K. 1997. Perspectives Critical Factors of Effective Project Management. The TQM Magazine. 9(6): 390–396.

Cooper, R. G. and Edgett, S. 2008. Benchmarking Best Practices Performances Results and the Role of Senior Management. Product Management. 3(1): 1–6.

Farrington P. A. and Martin P. 1994. Paving Way for Concurrent Engineering. Industrial Engineering Journal. 1(1): 50–52.

Gunasekaran, A. 1998. Cuncurrent Engineering: A Competitive Strategy for Process Industries. Journal of the Operational Research Society. 49(1): 758–765.

Hans, J. T. 2003. Managing Innovative R&D Teams. Journal of R&D Management. 33(3): 297–311.

Hauptman, Oscar, and Hirji, Karim K. 1999. Managing Integration and Coordination in Crossfunctional Teams: An International Study of Concurrent Engineering Product Development. R & D Management. 29(2): 179–191.

Hauser, J., Tellis G. J. and Griffin, A. 2006. Research on innovation: A Review and Agenda for Marketing Science. Marketing Science. 25(6): 687–717.

Kerzner, H. 2003. Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. 8th edition. John Wiley & Sons, NJ. 222–232.

King, N. and Majchzak, A. 1998. Concurrent Engineering Tools: Are the Human Issues Being Ignored. IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management. 43(2): 189–201.

Koufterous M. V. 2001. Concurrent Engineering and its Consequences. Journal of Operations Management. 19(1): 97–115.

Kumar, Vinod, Mathur, Sandeep and Kumar, Uma. 1994. An Overview of the Innovation Process in the Canadian Electronic and Telecommunication (E&T) Industry. Engineering Management Journal. 6(3): 23–30.

Ledwith, A. and O’Dwyer, M. 2009. Market Orientation, NPD Performance and Organization Performance in Small Firm. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 26(1): 652–661

Liker, Jeffery K., Collins, Paul D., and Hull, Frank M. 1999. Flexibility and Standardization:Test of a Contingency Model of Product Design-Manufacturing Integration. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 16(1): 248–267.

Lioukas, S. 2007. Concurrent Engineering: Strategy for Effective Product Development Team to Achieve and Sustain Company’s Objective. Harvard Business Review. 85(3): 94–102.

Malhotra Y. 1997. Process Models vs. Variance Models: What is the Difference? http://www.brint.com/wwwboard/messages/842.html, May, 1997.

Marisa, S., Marco, B., Peter, B. and Robert, V.D.M. 2008. Factors Influencing an Organization’s Ability to Manage Innovation: A Structured Literature Review and Conceptual Model. International Journal of Innovation Management. 12(4): 655–676.

Michael, L., 2008. Introduction of an Evaluation Tool to Predict the Probability of Success of Companies: The Innovativeness, Capabilities and Potential Model (ICP). Journal of Technology: Management and Innovation. 4(1): 33–47.

Muffatto, Moreno, and Roveda, Marco. 2002. Product Architecture and Platforms: A Conceptual Framework. International Journal of Technology Management. 24(2): 1–16.

Rasli A. 2006. Data Analysis and Beyond: A Practical Guide for Post-Graduate Social Scientists. Penerbit UTM, Skudai, Malaysia.

Rusinko, Cathy A. 1999 . Exploring the use of Design-Manufacturing Integration (DMI) to Facilitate Product Development: A Test of Some Practices. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 46(1): 56–71.

Rudha B., Ragu A. and Xueshu S. 2000. The Relevance of Concurrent Engineering in Industrial Technology Programs. Journal of Industrial Technology. 16: 2–5.

Shenhar, A.J, Tishler, A., Dvir, D.,Lipovetsky, S. and Lechler, T. 2002. Refining the Search for Project Success Factors: A Multivariate, Typological Approach. R&D Management Journal. 32(2): 111–126.

Smith, R. P. 1998. Deciding between Sequential and Concurrent Tasks in Engineering Design Concurrent Engineering. Sage Journals. 6(1): 16–25.

Terrell J. 2006. Scoring the HNQOL Instrument. The Laryngoscope. 110(2): 620–626.

Ulrich, Karl. 1995. The Role of Product Architecture in Manufacturing Firm. Research Policy. 24: 419–440.

Zhang J.C., Anthony D.B. and H. Scott. 2009. Product Development Strategy, Product Innovation Performance, and the Mediating Role of Knowledge Utilization: Evidence from Subsidiaries in China. Journal of International Marketing. 17(3): 42–58.

Downloads

Published

2013-02-15

Issue

Section

Social Sciences

How to Cite

The Impact of Concurrent Engineering Strategy on New Compex Product Development Process in Organization: An Empirical Study of Manufacturing and Service Industry in Malaysia. (2013). Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 61(1). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v61.1681