The Effects Of Controlling Parameters On Polymer Enhanced Foam (PEF) Stability

Authors

  • Amin Azdarpour Department of Petroleum Engineering, Faculty of Petroleum and Renewable Energy Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor Malaysia
  • Radzuan Bin Junin Department of Petroleum Engineering, Faculty of Petroleum and Renewable Energy Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor Malaysia
  • Muhammad Manan Department of Petroleum Engineering, Faculty of Petroleum and Renewable Energy Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor Malaysia
  • Hossein Hamidi Faculty of Chemical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), 40450, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Roozbeh Rafati Faculty of Chemical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), 40450, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v73.1701

Keywords:

PHPA, Surfactant, Foam, PEF, NaCl

Abstract

In the present study, four surfactants including AOS, SDS, SDBS, and TX100 were used as the foaming agent and a PHPA polymer with relatively low to high concentrations was added to the solutions prepared in both fresh water and 8 wt. % NaCl. Also, paraffin and vaseline oils with different viscosities were used to investigate the effect of oil on PEF stability. Polymer addition to foam can effectively improve foam stability compared with conventional foam stability. In addition, the polymer concentration increase could lead to foam stability increase; thus, the maximum polymer concentration in solutions could produce the most stable foam. Solutions with 8 wt. % NaCl had destabilizing effect, that is, unlike solutions with fresh water, it slightly reduced foam stability. Contacted oil in the solutions could substantially reduce foam stability. Also, the destabilizing effect was more severe with paraffin oil rather than vaseline oil. Of all the four surfactants used in this research, SDS had the highest compatibility with PHPA and produced the most stable foam, while AOS, SDBS, and finally TX100 surfactants were in next orders. In addition, microscopic photos showed that the type of solution has a significant effect on bubble size and foam stability. 

References

D.C. Bond, O.C. Holbrook. 1958. Gas Drive Oil Recovery Process. United States Patents. 2866507.

A. Azdarpour. 2011. The Effects Of Polymer Concentrations On Polymer Enhanced Foam (PEF) Stability. Msc thesis. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

D. Exerowa, P. M. Kruglyakov. 1998. Foam and Foam Films. Elsevier Science.

A. Azdarpour, O. Rahmani, E. Mohammadian, M. Parak, A.R.M. Daud, R. Junin. 2013. Business Engineering and Industrial Applications Colloquium (BEIAC2013). Langkawi, Malaysia. DOI: 10.1109/BEIAC.2013.6560275.

G. J. Hirasaki. 1989. The Steam–Foam Process. Journal of Petroleum Technology. 41: 449–456.

S. Lee. D. H. Kim, C. Huh, G. A. Pope. 2009. Development of a Comprehensive Rheological Property Database for EOR Polymers. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. New Orleans, Louisiana.

F.R. Wassmuth. L.H. Hodgins. L.L.S. Schramm, S.M. Kutay. 2001. Screening and Coreflood Testing of Gel Foams To Control Excessive Gas Production in Oil Wells. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering. 4: 187–194.

R.D. Sydansk. 1994a. Polymer–Enhanced Foam: Laboratory Development and Evaluation. SPE International Symposium of Oilfield Chemistry, New Orleans, USA.

R.D. Sydansk. 1994b. Polymer–Enhanced Foam Propagation Through High–Permeability Sandpacks. SPE International Symposium of Oilfield Chemistry, New Orleans, USA.

W.D. Mei. D.K. Han, G.L. Xu, L. Yang. 2008. Influence of partially hydrolyzed Polyacrylamide on the foam capability of Alpha Olefin Sulfonate surfactant. Petroleum Exploration and Development. 35: 335–338.

T. Zhu, O. Ogbe, S. Khataniar. 2004. Improving the Foam Performance for Mobility Control and Improved Sweep Efficiency in Gas Flooding. Journal of Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 43: 4413–4421.

ASTM D892. 2006. US: An American National Standard.

T. Zhu, A. Strycker, C.J. Raible, K. Vineyard. 1998. Foams for Mobility Control and Improved Sweep Efficiency in Gas Flooding. SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.

A. Mandal, K. Ojha. 2008. Optimum Formulation Of Alkaline Surfactant Polymer Systems For Enhanced Oil Recovery. SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Australia.

L. L. S. Schramm. 2000. Surfactants: Fundamentals And Applications In The Petroleum Industry. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

S. Manning-Benson, C.D. Bain, R.C. Darton. 1997. Measurement of dynamic interfacial properties in an overflowing cylinder by ellipsometry. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 189: 109–116.

C.D. Bain, S. Manning-Benson, R.C. Darton. 2000. Rates of Mass Transfer and Adsorption of CTAB at an Expanding Air–Water Interface. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 229: 247–256.

F.D. Martin, L.G. Donaruma, M.J. Hatch. 1980. Development Of Improved Mobility Control Agents For Surfactant /Polymer Flooding. First Annual Report to the U.S. Department of Energy, Bartlesville, Oklahoma.

K.C. Tam, C. Tiu. 1990. Role of ionic species and valency on the steady shear behavior of partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide polymer solutions. Colloid And Polymer Science. 268: 911–920.

T.J. Myers, C.J. Radke C. 2000. Transient foam displacement in the presence of residual oil: Experiment and simulation using a popular balance medel. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 39: 2725–2741.

T. Holt, F. Vassenden, I. Svorstol. 1996. Effects Of Pressure On Foam Stability, Implications For Foam Screening. SPE/DOE Tenth symposium on improved oil recovery, Tulsa, Oklahoma.

M. Safouane, A. Saint-Jalmes, V. Bergeron, D. Langevin. 2006. Viscosity effects in foam drainage: Newtonian and non-newtonian foaming fluids. Eur Phys J E Soft Matter. 19: 195–202.

B. Jean, L.T. Lee, B. Cabane, V. Bergeron. 2009. Foam Films from Thermosensitive PNIPAM and SDS Solutions. Langmuir. 25: 3966–3971.

S. Lionti-Addad, J.M. Di Meglio. 1992. Stabilization of aqueous foam by hydrosoluble polymers. 1. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-poly(ethylene oxide) system. Langmuir: 8: 324–327.

J. Klein, P. Luckham. 1982. Forces between two adsorbed polyethylene oxide layers immersed in a good aqueous solvent. Nature. 300: 429–431.

T. J. Myers. 1999. The Role Of Residual Oil In The Mechanistic Simulation Of Foam Flow N Porous Media: Experiment And Simulation With The Population Balance Method. PhD Dissertation, University of California, USA.

R. Farajzadeh, A. Andrianov, R. Krastev, G. J. Hirasaki, W. R. Rossen. 2012. Foam-Oil Interaction in Porous Media: Implications for Foam Assisted Enhanced Oil Recovery. SPE EOR Conference at Oil and Gas West Asia. Muscat, Oman.

S. Stöckle, P. Blecua, H. Möhwald, R. Krastev. 2010. Dynamics of thinning of foam films stabilized by n-dodecyl-beta-maltoside. Langmuir. 26: 4865–4872.

X. Duan, J. Houm T. Cheng, S. Li, Y. Ma. Evaluation of oil-tolerant foam for enhanced oil recovery: Laboratory study of a system of oil-tolerant foaming agents. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. Article in press, DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2014.07.042.

Downloads

Published

2015-02-10

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

The Effects Of Controlling Parameters On Polymer Enhanced Foam (PEF) Stability. (2015). Jurnal Teknologi, 73(1). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v73.1701