Keselarasan Personaliti dengan Pemilihan Program Sains Komputer dan Teknologi Maklumat

Authors

  • Azura Ishak Fakulti Teknologi dan Sains Maklumat, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Masura Rahmat Fakulti Teknologi dan Sains Maklumat, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Shahrina Shahrani Fakulti Teknologi dan Sains Maklumat, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Noor Faridatul Ainun Zainal Fakulti Teknologi dan Sains Maklumat, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Rohizah Abd Rahman Fakulti Teknologi dan Sains Maklumat, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v68.1831

Keywords:

Personality patterns, congruence degree, factors of program selections

Abstract

This study discusses personality patterns of the students from computer science and information technology programs, personality congruence level in determining the selection of computer science and information technology’s program, factors of program selections in computer science and information technology and correlations between those factors and personality congruence level. The participants were 154 of first year students from 2012/2013 batch from Faculty of Information Science and Technology (FTSM), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM). The instrument used for this research is a set of online questionnaire (Self-Directed Search (SDS) – Form Easily, a translated version from Amla, (1984) and factor of program selections (Norlia Melawi, 2000). Iachan Congruence Index has been used to measure personality congruence degree. The results demonstrate that student personality pattern, SKI produces low congruence degree, meaning that the factors of program selection are weak, thus not reflecting the present program student had assigned with (what they get). However, program selections are done based on their own preferences and interests, also influenced by other factors such as environment, rewards and family. Despite that, all the factors are not related with their congruence personality degree. 

Author Biographies

  • Azura Ishak, Fakulti Teknologi dan Sains Maklumat, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
    Pusat Pengajian Teknologi Maklumat
  • Masura Rahmat, Fakulti Teknologi dan Sains Maklumat, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
    Pusat Pengajian Sains Komputer
  • Shahrina Shahrani, Fakulti Teknologi dan Sains Maklumat, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
    Pusat Pengajian Teknologi Maklumat
  • Noor Faridatul Ainun Zainal, Fakulti Teknologi dan Sains Maklumat, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
    Pusat Pegajian Sains Komputer
  • Rohizah Abd Rahman, Fakulti Teknologi dan Sains Maklumat, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
    Pusat Pengajian Sains Komputer

References

Amla, H. M. Salleh. 1984. An Ivestigation of the Reliability, Validity, and Translation of Holland’s Direted-Search for Utilization by a Malaysian Population. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Western. Michigan University.

Amla Salleh, Zuria Mahmud & Ramlee Mustapha. 2008. Mengenal Potensi Kerjaya. Shah Alam. Oxford Fajar.

Atan Long. 1982. Psikologi Pendidikan, Kuala Lumpur. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Azizi, Shahrin, Jamaludin, Yusof & Abdul Rahim. 2007. Menguasai Penyelidikan dalam Pendididkan. Kuala Lumpur. PTS Profesional.

Bretz, R. D. & Judge, T. A. 1994. Person-organizational Fit and the Theory of Work Adjustment: Implications for Satisfaction, Tenure and Career Success. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 44: 32–54.

Holland, J. L. 1973. Making Vocational Choice: A Theory of Careers. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey. Prentice Hall.

Rosen, D., Holmberg, K., & Holland, J. L. 1997. The Educational Opportunities Finder. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.

Holland, J. L. 1985. A Theory of Vocational Personality and Work Environment. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey. Prentice Hall.

Hough, L. M., & Ones, D. S. 2001. The Structure, Measurement, Validity, & Use of Personality Variables in Industrial, Work, and Organizational Psychology. In N. Anderson, D. S. Ones, H. K. Sinangil, & C Viswesvaran. (Eds.). Handbook of Industrial, Work, and Organizational Psychology. London: Sage. 1: 233–277.

Iachan, R. 1984. A Measurement of Agreement for Use with the Holland Classification System. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 24: 133–141.

Krejcie, R. V, & Morgan, D. W. 1970. Determining Sample Size For Research Activities, Educational And Psychological Measurement. 38: 607–610.

Kwak, J. C. & Pulvino, C. J. 1982. A Mathematical Model for Comparing Holland's Personality and Environmental Codes. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 21. 231–241.

Mastura Mahfar, Ishak Mad Shah dan Hamdan Abdul Kadir 2008. Kekongruenan Personaliti-Persekitaran Kursus dan Hubungannya dengan Pencapaian Akademik di Kalangan Pelajar. Jurnal Kemanusiaan. 12: 23–32.

Mohd Majid Konting. 1993. Kaedah Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Norida Abdullah. 2006. Keselarasan Personaliti Dengan Program Pengajian dan Hubungannya Dengan Pencapaian Akademik Pelajar KUTKM. Pusat Perkhidmatan Akademik Kolej Universiti Teknikal Kebangsaan Malaysia, Melaka. Projek Penyelidikan Yang Tidak Diterbitkan.

Norlia Binti Melawi. 2000. Faktor yang mendorong Pemilihan Kerjaya Perguruan di Kalangan Pelajar Tahun Satu Sarjana Muda Teknologi serta Pendidikan, Fakulti Pendidikan di UTM Skudai Sesi 1999/2000: Satu Tinjaun. UTM. Tesis Sarjana Muda Yang Tidak Diterbitkan.

Puteri Hayati Megat. 2010. Bimbingan dan Kaunseling Kerjaya. Kuala Lumpur. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Sidek M. N., Abb. Malek Abd. Karim, W. Marzuki W. Jaafar, Nabilah Abdullah, Munirah Ghazali, Lihana Borhan, Joharry Othman, M.Taib Harun, Sapon Ibrahim, Norlena Salamuddin, Abd. Malek Abd. Rahman, Jamaludin Ahmad, Tajularipin Sulaiman, Zulkifli Mohamed, Mohd. Yusop Ab. Hadi & Syed Mohamed Shafeq Syed Mansor. 2008. Pendekatan p-p fit dalam Proses Pemilihan Calon Guru di Institusi Pengajian Tinggi Awam Di Malaysia. MEDC. 2: 71–82.

Siti Noorazzura Binti Ahmad & Faizah Binti Abd Ghani. 2009. Hubungan Trait Personaliti Dengan Pemilihan Kursus Di Kalangan Pelajar Sarjana Muda Teknologi Serta Pendidikan Elektrik. Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

Suzarina Suhod & Faizah Abd Ghani. 2008. Kesesuaian Personaliti Dengan Bidang Kursus Yang Diikuti Dan Hubungannya Dengan Faktor Pemilihan Kerjaya Perguruan Di Kalangan Pelajar Diploma Pendidikan Kemahiran Hidup. Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

Yahya Buntat & Noor Sharliana Mat Nasir. 2011. Faktor-Faktor yang Mendorong Kreativiti di Kalangan. Journal of Educational Psychology and Counseling. 2: 175–208.

Downloads

Published

2014-04-22

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

Keselarasan Personaliti dengan Pemilihan Program Sains Komputer dan Teknologi Maklumat. (2014). Jurnal Teknologi, 68(1). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v68.1831