Hybrid of ARIMA-GARCH Modeling in Rainfall Time Series
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v63.1908Keywords:
Volatility clustering, ARIMA, GARCH, autocorrelation function, McLeod-Li test, ARCH LM test, Ljung-Box testAbstract
The dependence structure of rainfall is usually very complex both in time and space. It is shown in this paper that the daily rainfall series of Ipoh and Alorsetar are affected by nonlinear characteristics of the variance often referred to as variance clustering or volatility, where large changes tend to follow large changes and small changes tend to follow small changes. In most empirical modeling of hydrological time series, the focus was on modeling and predicting the mean behavior of the time series through conventional methods of an Autoregressive Moving Average (ARMA) modeling proposed by the Box Jenkins methodology. The conventional models operate under the assumption that the series is stationary that is: constant mean and either constant variance or season-dependent variances, however, does not take into account the second order moment or conditional variance, but they form a good starting point for time series analysis. The residuals from preliminary ARIMA models derived from the daily rainfall time series were tested for ARCH behavior. The autocorrelation structure of the residuals and the squared residuals were inspected, the residuals are uncorrelated but the squared residuals show autocorrelation, the Ljung-Box test confirmed the results. McLeod-Li test and a test based on the Lagrange multiplier (LM) principle were applied to the squared residuals from ARIMA models. The results of these auxiliary tests show clear evidence to reject the null hypothesis of no ARCH effect. Hence indicates that GARCH modeling is necessary. Therefore the composite ARIMA-GARCH model captures the dynamics of the daily rainfall series in study areas more precisely. On the other hand, Seasonal ARIMA model became a suitable model for the monthly average rainfall series of the same locations treated.
References
Ashley R.A., D.M. Patterson. 2001. Nonlinear Model Specification/Diagnostics: Insights from a battery of nonlinearity tests. http://ashleymac.econ.vt.edu/working_papers/E9905.pdf, 1–42.
Bollerslev, T., R.Y. Chou, K.F. Kroner. 1992. ARCH Modeling in Finance. A Review of the Theory and Empirical Evidence. J. Econometrics. 52: 5–59.
Bollerslev, T. 1986. Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity. J. Econometrics. 31(3): 307–327.
Box, G. E. P., G. M. Jenkins. 1976. Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control. Holden-Day, Boca Raton, Fla., USA.
Engle, R.F. 1982. Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of Variance of United Kingdom Inflation. Econometrica. 50: 987–1008.
Ljung, G.M., G. E. P. Box. 1978. On a Measure of a Lack of Fit in Time Series Models. Biometrika. 65(2): 297–303.
Hanaish, I. S., I. Kamarulzaman, J. Abdul Aziz. 2011. Stochastic Modeling of Rainfall in Peninsular Malaysia Using Bartlett Lewis Rectangular Pulses Models. Modelling and Simulation in Engineering Volume 2011, Article ID 253735, 6 pages doi:10.1155/2011/253735.
Ho, M. K., Y. Fadhilah. 2012. Homogeneity Tests on Daily Rainfall Series in Peninsular Malaysia. Int. J. Contemp. Math. Sciences. 7(1): 9–22.
Hong, Y. 2006. Serial Correlation and Serial Dependence.http://www.wise.xmu.edu.cn/discourse/2006/HONG_Yonmiao_Serial_Correlation.pdf, WISEWP0601. 1–28.
Juneng, L. 2010.Forecasting the Malaysian winter monsoon rainfall anomalies using statistical techniques. National Seminar on meteorology: School of Environment and Natural Resource Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology UniversitiKebangsaan Malaysia.
Laux, P., S. Vogl, W. Qiu, H.R. Knoche, H. Kunstmann. 2011. Copula-based statistical refinement of precipitation in RCMsimulations over complex terrain. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 15: 2401–2419.
McLeod, A.I., W.K. Li. 1983. Diagnostic Checking ARMA Time Series Models Using Squared Residual Autocorrelations. Journal of Time Series Analysis. 4: 269–273.
Suhaila, J., K. Ching-Yee, Y. Fadhilah, F.Hui-Mean. 2011. Introducing the Mixed Distribution in Fitting Rainfall Data. Open Journal of Modern Hydrology. 1: 11–22.
Suhaila, J., J. AbdulAziz. 2007. Fitting the Statistical Distributions to the Daily Rainfall Amount in Peninsular Malaysia. Jurnal Teknologi, Universiti teknologi Malaysia. 46(C): 33–48.
SvetlÃková, D., S. Kohnova, J. Szolgay, M. KomornÃková, K. HlavÄová. 2009.Analysis of Monthly Discharge and Precipitation Time Series for Selected Wetlands in Slovakia. International Symposium on Water Management and Hydraulic Engineering,Ohrid/Macedonia, 1-5 September 2009, A91.
Szolgayova, E. 2011. Modelling and Forecasting Daily River Discharge Considering Autoregressive Heteroskedasticity. Geophysical Research Abstract. Vol. 13, EGU2011-10681-1.
Villarini, G., J. A. Smith, F. Napolitano. 2010. Nonstationary Modeling of a Long Record of Rainfall and Temperature Over Rome. Advances in Water Resources. 33(10): 1256–1267.
Wang, W., P. H. A. J. M. Van Gelder, J.K. Vrijling, J. Ma. 2005. Testing and Modelling Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity of Streamflow Processes. Nonlin. Processes Geophys. 12: 55–66.
Wong, C.L., R. Venneker, S. Uhlenbrook, A.B.M. Jamil, Y. Zhou. 2009. Variability of rainfall in Peninsular Malaysia. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. 6: 5471–5503.
Zalina, M.D., H.M.K. Amir, N.M.D. Mohd, V.N. Van-Thanh. 2002. Statistical Analysis of at-site Extreme Rainfall Processes in Peninsular Malaysia. Proceedings of the Fourth International FRIF.ND Conference held at Cape Town. South Africa. March 2002). IAHS Publ. no. 274.61–68.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright of articles that appear in Jurnal Teknologi belongs exclusively to Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Penerbit UTM Press). This copyright covers the rights to reproduce the article, including reprints, electronic reproductions, or any other reproductions of similar nature.