Perbandingan Pola Pembelajaran Kontekstual dan Tahap Pemahaman Konsep Sains Pelajar Sekolah Menengah Rendah di Malaysia dan Singapura

Authors

  • Low Kee Sun Institut Pendidikan Guru Kampus Kent Tuaran, Sabah, Malaysia
  • Lay Yoon Fah Sekolah Pendidikan dan Pembangunan Sosial, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v63.2017

Keywords:

Pattern contextual learning, level of understanding science concepts, TIMSS abstract

Abstract

In order to produce world class human model, science education that is able to provide individuals who are innovative, creative and productive was the main focus of the education system in Malaysia. Malaysian student science performance deteriorating sharply against other Asian countries (TIMSS 2007) has resulted in our country is falling behind. Failure to relate the lesson content with real-life context of a major source of students are not interested and thus not able to capture the knowledge of good science. Contextual learning approach to build a concrete relationship between the content of science education in the context of the day has become the main approach outlined in the syllabus of Science in Malaysia and also in many countries. Thus contextual learning pattern also focus on the survey. This study examined the differences contextual learning pattern and level of understanding of science concepts junior high school students in Malaysia and Singapore. Data were collected from the Trends in International Mathematics Program and Science Study 2007 (TIMSS), the sample consisted of 4,466 students of Malaysia and 4,599 students of Singapore. The results showed that there were significant differences between the patterns of contextual learning and students' level of understanding of the concept of Sciences Malaysia and Singapore. Singapore students showed a higher level of understanding of Malaysian students in all domains, especially in the understanding and application domains. The results also showed a significant relationship between contextual learning pattern with students' understanding of Science concepts, but the regression of these two variables is very low.

References

Marc, J. 2007. TIMSS 2007 Sample Design. TIMSS Technical Report. TIMSS and PIRLS International Study Centre, Boston College.

Mohamad Hussin bin Mohamad Yusof. 1998. Hubungan antara Kreativiti Dengan Pencapaian Akademik. Tesis Sarjana Pendidikan. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

Mohd Najib Abdul Ghaffar. 1999. Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Skudai: Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

Mok, Soon Sang. 2002. Pedagogi Untuk Kursus Diploma Perguruan Semester 3. Edisi ketiga. Subang Jaya: Kumpulan Budiman.

Ng Kim Choy. 1999. Prinsip-prinsip Pembelajaran Koperatif. Sandakan: Maktab Perguruan Sabah. Tidak diterbitkan.

Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum. 2001c. Pembelajaran Secara Kontekstual. Kuala Lumpur .Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia Rancangan Malaysia Ke Sepuluh. 2010. Unit Perancangan Ekonomi Jabatan Perdana Menteri Putrajaya i

Sharifah Maimunah bte Syed Zin dab lewin, K. M. 1993. Insights Into Science Education. Planning and Policy Priorities In Malaysia. Paris. UNESCO.

Downloads

Published

2013-08-15

Issue

Section

Social Sciences

How to Cite

Perbandingan Pola Pembelajaran Kontekstual dan Tahap Pemahaman Konsep Sains Pelajar Sekolah Menengah Rendah di Malaysia dan Singapura. (2013). Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 63(2). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v63.2017