Goals of Science Education in the Tertiary Level: Assessment of the College of Science Faculty, University of Eastern Philippines

Authors

  • Marliza E. Rubenecia College of Science, University of Eastern, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v63.2018

Keywords:

Goals, science, education, tertiary faculty, constructivism

Abstract

The study determined the knowledge of the College of Science faculty on the goals of science education, the importance of each goal as perceived by the faculty, how often each goal is used and operationalized for teaching/learning purposes. The results revealed that teachers’ level of knowledge on the science goals and objectives was minimal. The faculty perceived scientific knowledge and methods very important and used it frequently in teaching. They used lecture for students to acquire scientific knowledge and laboratory activities to develop scientific methods. They did not know how to operationalize societal issues, personal needs, and career awareness when teaching their subject matter. The problems that prevent them from pursuing the goals were lack of instructional materials, lack of interest and negative attitude of students, lack of facilities, and knowledge in handling laboratory apparatus. Teachers do not utilize strategies that can facilitate the students’ construction of meaning and ideas.

References

Alesandrini, K. & Larson, L. 2002. Teachers Bridge to Constructivism. The Clearing House. 31: 118.

Arcilla, R. 2001. Module in Elementary Statistics. De La Salle University, Manila. 19.

Cobern, W. 1995. Constructivism for Science Teachers. Science Education International. 6(3): 8–12.

Dimaandal, L. 1998. Science Teaching and Testing. Quezon City: Office of Vice Academic Support and Instructional Services, UP Open University.

Ibe, M. 1997. Seminar: Issues and Trends in Science and Technology Education. Diliman, Quezon City: Office of Academic Support and Instructional Services, UP Open University. 9.

Limjap, A. 1996. A Constructivist Based Instructional Systems Design for Undergraduate Mathematics. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. De La Salle University. Manila.

Limjap, A. 1999. Enhancithe Deductive Reasoning of Mathematics Teachers in A Constructivist Environment. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher. 28–57.

Mendoza, A. 1998. Roundtable Discussion for the National Science and Mathematics Education Congress on Materials and Methods in Basic Education and In-Service Teacher Training in Science and Mathematics (1960-1998) held at UP-ISMED on September 15,1998. In: Ogena, E.B.; Brawner, F., eds. Science Education in the Philippines: Challenges for Development, Vol. 1. Metro Manila, SEI- Department of Science and Technology.

Reyes, V. 1998. Roundtable Discussion for the National Science and Mathematics Education Congress on Materials and Methods in Basic Education and In-Service Teacher Training in Science and Mathematics (1960-1998) held at UP-ISMED on September 15, 1998. In: Ogena, E.B.; Brawner, F., eds. Science Education in the Philippines: Challenges for Development, Vol. 1. Metro Manila, SEI- Department of Science and Technology.

Tsaparlis, G. 2001. Theories in Science Education at the Threshold of the Third Millennium. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe. 2(1): 1–4.

Cobb, 1994. cited in Kamii and Lewis; B. http://www.ibe.unesco. org/curriculum/China/Pdf/IIphilippines.pdf.

Downloads

Published

2013-08-15

Issue

Section

Social Sciences

How to Cite

Goals of Science Education in the Tertiary Level: Assessment of the College of Science Faculty, University of Eastern Philippines. (2013). Jurnal Teknologi, 63(2). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v63.2018