EFFECTS OF AIR INTAKE RUNNER LENGTH AND DIAMETER ON THE VOLUMETRIC EFFICIENCY OF SI ENGINE

Authors

  • Mohamad Firzan Ahmad Harazi Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, 43400, Malaysia
  • Abdul Aziz Hairuddin Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, 43400, Malaysia
  • Azizan As'arry Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, 43400, Malaysia
  • Siti Ujila Masuri Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, 43400, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jurnalteknologi.v87.21157

Keywords:

Intake runner length, intake runner diameter, wave propagation, volumetric efficiency, helmholtz resonator

Abstract

The performance of an engine is majorly influenced by volumetric efficiency which is on how much air an engine cylinder can be filled. Low engine performance by low and inconsistent volumetric efficiency across different engine speeds can be due to air pressure wave flow in the intake system. Thus, in this current study, we present an approach in investigation on the impact of intake parameters aimed at maximizing Proton CamPro 1.6L SI engine performance and efficiency. The approach incorporates helmholtz resonance and wave propagation method to improve engine performance through intake system. It was expected that the study can obtained the optimized air intake length and diameter for the engine to operate at optimum efficiency. A combination of fluid flow simulation and air wave theory in 1D computation fluid dynamic were implemented to compute its behavior in the engine cycle. The simulation ran on the different range of engine speed from 1000 rpm to 6500 rpm and different design parameters based on helmholtz resonator and wave propagation method for intake runner length and intake runner diameter. The results demonstrated significant improvement at mid-range rpm which had the intake runner length improved volumetric efficiency up to 8.71% by increasing the length to 528 mm while improved up to 5.34% by decreasing the diameter to 34.7 mm. For high rpm range, volumetric efficiency improved up to 4.19% by increasing the diameter to 44.4 mm and maintaining the short runner length of 400 mm. 

Author Biography

  • Abdul Aziz Hairuddin, Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, 43400, Malaysia

    Professor, Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,

    Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia

References

Talati, H., Aliakbari, K., Ebrahimi-Moghadam, A., Khoshbakht Farokhad, H., Eskandary Nasrabad, A. 2022. Optimal Design and Analysis of a Novel Variable-length Intake Manifold on a Four-cylinder Gasoline Engine. Appl Therm Eng. 200: 117631.

Pahmi, A., Hisyam Basri, M., Mustaffa, M. E., Yaakob, Y., Sharudin, H., Ismail, N. I., Talib, R. J. 2019. Intake Pressure and Brake Mean Effective Pressure Analysis on Various Intake Manifold Design. J Phys Conf Ser. 1349(1): 012080.

Jemni, M. A., Driss, Z., Kantchev, G., Abid, M. S. 2013. Intake Manifold Shape Influence on the Unsteady In-Cylinder Flow: Application on LPG Bi-fuel Engine. In: Haddar M, Romdhane L, Louati J, Ben Amara A (eds). Des. Model. Mech. Syst. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg. 331–338.

Raja, K., Selvam, A. J. 2022. Experimental Investigation of Four Stroke Single Cylinder SI Engine by Modified Intake Manifold by using Computational Fluid Dynamics. Int J Ambient Energy. 43(1): 229–236.

Sulaiman, S. A., Murad, S. H. M., Ibrahim, I., Abdul Karim, Z. A. 2010. Study of Flow in Air-intake System for a Single-cylinder Go-Kart Engine. Int J Automot Mech Eng. 1(1): 91–104.

Shin, J., Kim, D., Son, Y, Park S. 2022. Effect of Intake Manifold Geometry on Cylinder-to-cylinder Variation and Tumble Enhancement in Gasoline Direct Injection Engine. Sci Rep. 12(1): 19862.

Breisacher, P., Nichols, R. J., Hicks, W. A. 1972. Exhaust Emission Reduction Through Two-Stage Combustion. Combust Sci Technol. 6: 191–201.

Namar, M., Jahanian, O., Shafaghat, R., Nikzadfar, K. 2021. Engine Downsizing; Global Approach to Reduce Emissions: A World-Wide Review. HighTech Innov J. 2: 384–399.

Watson, N., Janota, M. S. 1982. Turbocharging the Internal Combustion Engine. London: London: Palgrave Macmillan.

B. Heywood J. 1988. Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Rajoo, S., & Martines-Botas, R. 2008. Automotive turbocharging. In Research on Vehicle Technologies. Johor: Penerbit UTM. 1–22.

Bahng, G., Jang, D., Kim, Y., Shin, M. 2016. A New Technology to Overcome the Limits of HCCI Engine through Fuel Modification. Applied Thermal Engineering. 98: 266–273. Doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.12.076.

Harris W. 2006. How Superchargers Work. HowStuffWorks. https://auto.howstuffworks.com/question122.htm.

J. Heywood. 1988. Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals. Choice Rev Online. 26(02): 26-0943-26–0943.

Cho, H. M. 1997. Supercharging Performance of a gasoline Engine with a Supercharger. ll(5): 556–564.

Ghodke S, Bari S. 2018. Effect of Integrating Variable Intake Runner Diameter and Variable Intake Valve Timing on an SI Engine’s Performance. SAE Tech Pap. Doi: 10.4271/2018-01-0380.

Bapiri, S., Sorusbay, C. 2019. Investigating the Effects of Variable Valve Timing on Spark Ignition Performance. Archives of Thermodynamics. 40(1): 3–22. Doi: 10.12913/22998624/103917.

Tracy, D. 2013. How Variable Valve Timing Works. Jalopnik. https://jalopnik.com/how-variable-valve-timing-works-511386807.

Dresner, T., Barkan, P. 1989. A Review of Variable Valve Timing Benefits and Modes of Operation. SAE Technical Paper 891676. Warrendale, PA: SAE International. Doi: 10.4271/891676.

Goodnight, N., VanGelder, K. 2019. Automotive Engine Performance. Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Aradhye, O., Bari, S. 2017. Continuously Varying Exhaust Pipe Length and Diameter to Improve the Performance of a Naturally Aspirated SI Engine. In: Vol. 6 Energy. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, p V006T08A054.

Sawant, P., Warstler, M., Bari, S. 2018. Exhaust Tuning of an Internal Combustion Engine by the Combined Effects of Variable Exhaust Pipe Diameter and an Exhaust Valve Timing System. Energies. Doi: 10.3390/en11061545.

Chauhan, B. S., Cho, H. M. 2017. The Analysis of the Throttle body of the Intake System in the Engine through CFD. International Journal of Automotive Technology. 5(1): 75–77.

Bordjane, M. 2015. Numerical Investigation Of Throttle Valve Flow Characteristics For Internal Combustion Engines. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research. 2(12): 3532–3541.

Glogovcsan JA. 2002. Volumetric Efficiency Enhancing Throttle Body. SAE Technical Paper Series. https://doi.org/10.4271/2002-01-2823.

Ceviz, M. A. 2007. Intake Plenum Volume and Its Influence on the Engine Performance, Cyclic Variability and Emissions. Applied Thermal Engineering. 48: 961–966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2007.06.007.

de Souza, G. R., de Castro Pellegrini, C., Ferreira, S. L., Soto Pau, F., Armas, O. 2019. Study of Intake Manifolds of an Internal Combustion Engine: A New Geometry based on Experimental Results and Numerical Simulations. Therm Sci Eng Prog. 9: 248–258.

Malkhede, D. N., Khalane, H. 2015. Maximizing Volumetric Efficiency of IC Engine through Intake Manifold Tuning. SAE 2015 World Congr Exhib. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4271/2015-01-1738.

Winterbone, D. E., Pearson, R. J. 2000. Theory of Engine Manifold Design: Wave Action Methods for IC Engines. Professional Engineering Publishing. https://worldcat.org/title/606473104.

Heywood, J. B. 2018. Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals. 2nd Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.

Winterbone, D. E., Pearson, R. J. 1999. Design Techniques for Engine Manifolds: Wave Action Methods for IC Engines. Society of Automotive Engineers. https://worldcat.org/title/821203068.

Winterbone, D., Pearson, R., Qatu, M., Siavoshani, S. 2001. Theory of Engine Manifold Design: Wave Action Methods for IC Engineers. Appl Mech Rev. 54(6): B109–B110.

Dhawale, P., Albert, J., Patil, S., Jadhav, A. 2020. Review on Design of Intake Manifold for Air Restricted Engine. Int Res J Eng Technol. 7: 5.

Mohiuddin, A., Rahman, A. 2008. Investigation and Probable Solution of Low End Torque Dip Problem of Campro 1.6 L Engine. Int J Mech Mater Eng. 3:176–186.

Bari, S., Sawant, P. 2019. Improvement of Performance by 2-Step Variations of Intake Runner Length and intake Valve Timing in the Induction System of a SI Engine. Energy Procedia. 160(2018):108–115.

Pahmi, A., Mustaffa, M. E., Basri, M. H., Ismail, N. I., Azmi, H., Sharudin, H., Othman, R., Mat, S. C. 2022. Effect of Intake Length on the Engine Performance of Single Cylinder Engine. Proc Mech Eng Res.129–130.

Sawant, P., Bari, S. 2017. Combined Effects of Variable Intake Manifold Length, Variable Valve Timing and Duration on the Performance of an Internal Combustion Engine. Energy. Proceedings of the ASME 2017 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition (IMECE2017). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2017-70470

Sammut, G., Alkidas, A. C. 2007. Relative Contributions of Intake and Exhaust Tuning on SI Engine Breathing - A Computational Study. SAE World Congr Exhib. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4271/2007-01-0492.

Allawi, M. K., Mejbel, M. K., Oudah, M. H. 2021. Variable Valve Timing (VVT) Modelling by Lotus Engine Simulation Software. Int J Automot Mech Eng. 17(4): 8397–8410.

Alves, LOFT, dos Santos, M. G. D., Urquiza, A. B., Guerrero, J. H., de Lira, J. C., Abramchuk, V. 2018. Design of a New Intake Manifold of a Single Cylinder Engine with Three Stages. SAE Tech Pap Ser. Doi: 10.4271/2017-36-0172.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-22

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

EFFECTS OF AIR INTAKE RUNNER LENGTH AND DIAMETER ON THE VOLUMETRIC EFFICIENCY OF SI ENGINE. (2025). Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 87(5), 875-886. https://doi.org/10.11113/jurnalteknologi.v87.21157