Comparison Between Two Different Types of Microcontroller in Developing Optical Tomography Controller Unit

Authors

  • M. Fadzli Abdul Shaib Faculty of Electrical & Electronic Engineering, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, 86400, Parit Raja,Batu Pahat, Johor Darul Takzim, Malaysia
  • Ruzairi Abdul Rahim Process Tomography and Instrumentation Engineering Research Group (PROTOM-i), Infocomm Research Alliance, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bharu, Johor, Malaysia
  • Siti Zarina M. Muji Faculty of Electrical & Electronic Engineering, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, 86400, Parit Raja,Batu Pahat, Johor Darul Takzim, Malaysia
  • Naizatul Shima Process Tomography and Instrumentation Engineering Research Group (PROTOM-i), Infocomm Research Alliance, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bharu, Johor, Malaysia
  • Mohd Zikrillah Zawahir Process Tomography and Instrumentation Engineering Research Group (PROTOM-i), Infocomm Research Alliance, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bharu, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v64.2126

Keywords:

Optical tomography, microcontroller

Abstract

This paper describes the comparisons on the usage of different PIC microcontroller towards the development of optical tomography controller for fan beam projection. The advantage and disadvantage for each PIC towards the development of tomography sensors is discussed. The transmission and receiving conditioning circuit integrate with PIC is presented and explained. This paper is vital for further development of optical tomography system as a whole system.

References

Tomasz Dyakowski, Laurent F. C. Jeanmeure, Artur J. Jaworski. 2000. Applications of Electrical Tomography for Gas–Solids and Liquid–Solids Flows—A Review. Powder Technology. 112: 174–192.

S. Ibrahim, et al. 2012. Concentration Measurements of Bubbles in a Water Column Using an Optical Tomography System. ISA Transation. 51(6): 821–826.

G A Johansen, T Frøystein, B T Hjertakery and Ø Olsen. 1996. A Dual Sensor Flow Imaging Tomographic System. Meas. Sci. Technol. 7: 297–307.

Ruzairi Abdul Rahim, Jon Fea Pang, Kok San Chan. 2005. Optical Tomography Sensor Configuration Using Two Orthogonal and Two Rectilinear Projection Arrays. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation. 16(5): 327–340.

Ruzairi Abdul Rahim, L. C. Leong, K. S. Chan, M. H. Rahiman, J. F. Pang. 2008. Real Time Mass Flow Rate Measurement Using Multiple Fan Beam Optical. ISA Transactions. 47: 3–14.

Yingna Zheng,Qiang Liu,Yang Li,Nabil Gindy. 2006. Investigation on Concentration Distribution and Mass Flow Rate Measurement for Gravity Chute Conveyor by Optical Tomography System. Measurement. 39: 643–654.

S. Zarina Mohd Muji. 2012. Optical Tomography for Solid Gas Measurement Using Mix Projection. Thesis, UTM.

Green, R. G., Horbury, N. M., Abdul Rahim, R., Dickin, F. J., Naylor, B. D. and Pridmore, T. P. 1995. Optical Fibre Sensors For Process Tomography. Meas. Sci. Technol. Meas. Sci. Technol. 6: 1699–1704.

M. Fadzli B Abdul Shaib, Ruzairi Abdul Rahim, Siti Zarina M. Muji, Leow. 2012. Pei Ling, M. Mahadi Abdul Jamil, A Study on Optical Sensors Orientation for Tomography System Development. Sensors & Transducers Journal. 140(5): 45–52.

Microchip. 2009. PIC18F4520 Data Sheet.

Microchip. 2011. dsPIC6014A Data Sheet.

Siti Zarina M. Muji, Ruzairi Abdul Rahim. 2010. Two Microcontrollers Interaction Using C, Second International Conference on Computer Research & Development. 7-10 May. 290–292.

R. Abdul Rahim. S.Z Mohd. Muji. January 2013. Optical Tomography: Image Improvement using Mix Projection of Parallel and Fan Beam Mode. Measurement Journal (ISSN: 0263-2241). Elsevier Science. 46: 1970–1978.

Downloads

Published

2013-09-15

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

Comparison Between Two Different Types of Microcontroller in Developing Optical Tomography Controller Unit. (2013). Jurnal Teknologi, 64(5). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v64.2126