Effect of Skewed Signalised T–intersection on Traffic Delay

Authors

  • Othman Che Puan Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Hardi Saadullah Fathullah School of Architecture and Construction, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Koya University, Sulaimani, Iraq–Kurdistan Region
  • M. Al–Muz–Zammil Yasin Faculty of Education, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Muttaka Na’iya Ibrahim Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Shafini Halim Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v65.2141

Keywords:

Signalised intersection, skewed intersection, control delay

Abstract

Intersections are places where two or more highways intersect. Their performance dictates the performance of the rest of the traffic network. When two highways cannot intersect at right angles due to some geometric constraints, skewed intersection forms. Generally a traffic signal system is designed to control traffic movements at road intersections without considering the orientation of the intersection. Such an approach might lead to inaccurate assessment of operational performance of a signalised intersection because such a configuration influences turning radius and hence the vehicle’s negotiation speeds. This paper describes the result of a study carried out to evaluate the effect of orientation of a signalised intersection on the control delay to vehicular traffic. The evaluation was carried out using aaSIDRA software, which was calibrated using the data collected from site. Two models of skewed intersection based on a normal T–intersection were simulated at minor approach at 45º (i.e. skewed to the left), and 135º (i.e. skewed to the right), respectively. The result of the analysis showed that delay to the motorists in the minor approach increases when the minor approach is skewed from left to right..

References

AASHTO. 2004. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. Washington DC.

Gattis, J. L. and Sonny, T. L. 1998. Intersection Angle Geometry and the Driver’s Field of View. Transportation Research Record. 1612, TRB, National research council, Washington DC. 10–16.

Hanna, J. T., Flynn, T. E. & Webb L. T. 1976. Characteristics of Intersection Accidents in Rural Municipalities. Transportation Research Record. 601, TRB, Washington DC.

Arndt, O. and Troutbeck R. 2005. Relationship Between Unsignalised Intersection Geometry and Accident Rates. Proc. 3rdInternational Symposium on Highway Geometric Design. TRB. June 29-July 1. Chicago.

Garcia, A. 2005. Lateral Vision Angles and Skewed Intersections Design. Proc. 3rd International Symposium on Highway Geometric Design. TRB. June 29-July 1 Chicago.

Garber, N. J. and Hoel, L. A. 2009. Traffic & Highway Engineering. Fourth Edition. USA: RPK Editorial service.

Myer Kurz (editor). 2004. Handbook of Transportation Engineering. McGraw-Hill.

Akçelik, R. 2009. SIDRA Intersection User Guide. Victoria, Australia.

Highway Planning Unit. 2006. Malaysian Highway Capacity Manual (MHCM). Ministry of Work, Malaysia.

Transportation Research Board. 2000. Highway Capacity Manual 2000. National Research Council, Washington, D.C.

Downloads

Published

2013-10-15

How to Cite

Effect of Skewed Signalised T–intersection on Traffic Delay. (2013). Jurnal Teknologi, 65(3). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v65.2141