Conceptualising the Indicators of Walkability for Sustainable Transportation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v65.2151Keywords:
Sustainable development, walkability, walkability indicators, walkability measuresAbstract
Walkability is becoming a popular buzzword in planning cities that suffers high level of pollution due to, amongst others, emission from automobiles are embracing walkability in order to reap its benefits. In addition to that, walkability is the measure of how satisfactorily the transportation system meets the need of walking of the community. Several studies around the world have put great efforts to highlight the importance of walkability in urban as it is an important measure in determining a better environment. There is a strong relationship between walkability, sustainable transportation and the environment. In addition to that, walkability is a concept that is consistent with sustainable development and transportation system due to its economic, social and environmental benefits. Walkability satisfaction rating within a localized neighborhood can be measured at the macro level with the aid of GIS at the initial development stages. The methods and techniques used are varying and no single walkability assessment tool can be designed to suit different environmental conditions. Different groups of societies for whom the theoretical and practical perception of cities development vary, or different types of neighborhoods with different needs would warrant different approaches. Therefore, this paper examines the methods, techniques and indicators that have been used to measure walkability and highlights the important benefits of improving walkability in the built environment. Moreover it also describes the relationship between walkability, sustainable transportation and environment.
References
Cleland, V. J., Timperio, A. & Crawford, D. 2008. Are Perceptions of the Physical and Social Environment Associated with Mothers Walking for Leisure and for Transport? A Longitudinal Study. Preventive Medicine. 47(2): 188–193.
Tee, E. S. 2002. Obesity in Asia: Prevalence and Issues in Assessment Methodologies. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 11(8): 694–701.
Lekhraj, R. et al. 2007. A National Survey Study on the Prevalence of Obesity Among 16,127 Malaysians. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 16(3): 6–561.
Notari. 1993. Catalysis Today. 18: 163.
Henderson, K. A. 2006. Urban Parks and Trails and Physical Activity. Journal of Leisure Research. 9(4): 201–213.
Vojnovic, I. et al. 2006. The Renewed Interest in Urban Form and Public Health: Promoting Increased Physical Activity in Michigan. Cities. 23(1): 1–17.
Deborah, A. C. et al. 2007. Contribution of Public Parks to Physical Activity. American Journal of Public Health. 97(3): 509.
Cohen, D. A., Scribner, R. A. & Farley, T. A. 2000. A Structural Model of Health Behaviour: A Pragmatic Approach to Explain and Influence Health Behaviours at the Population Level. Preventive Medicine. 30(2): 146–154.
Ugwu, Haupt, T. C. 2007. Key Performance Indicators and Assessment Methods for Infrastructure Sustainability In South African Construction Industry Perspective. Building and Environment. 42(2): 665–680.
K. A. Gray and M. E. Finster. 2010. The Urban Heat Island, Photochemical Smog, and Chicago: Local Features of the Problem and Solution. Dept. of Civil Eng. Northwestern Univ., Evanston, IL, June.
P. Graham. 2003. Building Ecology: First Principles for a Sustainable Built Environment. 1st ed. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
J. Bergs. The Effect of Healthy Workplaces on the Well-being and Productivity of Office Workers. Symposium Paper, plants-in-buildings.com, Netherlands. 1–12.
OECD. 1996. Towards Sustainable Transportation. OECD Publications, Paris.
Ruckelhaus, W. D. 1989. Toward a Sustainable World. Scientiï¬c American, September. 114–120.
Litman, T. 2003. Sustainable Transportation Indicators. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, Victoria, BC, Canada. Available from http://www.vtpi.org.
WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development). 1987. Our Common Future. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Southworth, Michael. 2005. Designing the Walkable City. Journal of Urban Planning and Development. 131(4): 246–257.
Handy, Susan, Xinyu Cao, and Patricia L. Mokhtarian. 2006. Self-selection in the Relationship between the Built Environment and Walking. Journal of American Planning Association. 72(1): 55–74.
Zande R. D. 2006. Recommendations for a Pedestrian Friendly Campus. West Virginia University, Orlando.
Lloyd Wright. 2005. Car-Free Development (Eschborn, GTZ, 2005). Available from www.sutp.org (accessed 27 April 2012).
Our Cities Ourselves, Ten Principles for Transport in Urban Life. (2002). The Future of Transportation in Urban Life. Institute of Transportation and Department Policy (ITDP) Gehl Architects.
Aya Miyakoda. 2004. A Pedestrian Friendly Environment for Downtown Baton Rouge, Master thesis, B.D. Kobe Design University.
Measuring Walkability: Tools and Assessment, March 12, 2010. From http://ww4.kcmo.org/planning/walkplan/measure.pdf.
Galanis A., Eliou Nikolaos. 2011. Evaluation of the Pedestrian Infrastructure Using Walkability Indicators. WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development. 12(7): 385–394.
Cervero, R., and Duncan, M. 2003. Walking, Bicycling and Urban Landscapes: Evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area. American Journal of Public Health. 93(9): 1478–1483.
Craig, C. L., Brownson, R. C., Cragg, S. E., and Dunn, A. L. 2002. Exploring the Effect of the Environment on Physical Activity: A Study Examining Walking to Work. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 23(2S): 36–43.
Litman, T. 2012. Evaluating Transportation Land Use Impacts: Considering the Impacts, Benefits and Costs of Different Land Use Development Patterns, Victoria Transport Policy Institute (VTPI), Canada.
Park, S. 2008. Defining, Measuring, and Evaluating Path Walkability, and Testing Its Impacts on Transit Users’ Mode Choice and Walking Distance to the Station. University of California Transportation Center, Berkeley
Dannenberg, A. L., Cramer, T. W., Gibson, J. C. 2009. Assessing the Walkability of the Workplace: A New Audit Tool. The Science of Health Promotion. 20(1): 39–44.
Hoehner, C. M., Brennan Ramirez, L. K., Elliott, M. B., Handy, S .L., and Brownson, R. C. 2005. Perceived and Objective Environmental Measures and Physical Activity Among Urban Adults. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 28(2): 105–116.
Powell, K. E., Martin, L.M., and Chowdhury, P. P. 2003. Places To Work: Convenience and Regular Physical Activity. American Journal of Public Health. 93(9): 1519–1521.
Appleyard, D. 1981. Liveable Streets. Berkelery: University of California Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright of articles that appear in Jurnal Teknologi belongs exclusively to Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Penerbit UTM Press). This copyright covers the rights to reproduce the article, including reprints, electronic reproductions, or any other reproductions of similar nature.
