Evaluation on Mix Design and Rutting Resistance of Dry Mixed Rubberised Asphalt Mixtures

Authors

  • Norhidayah Abdul Hassan PhD, Lecturer, Department of Highway and Transportation, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Mohd Rosli Hainin Professor, Lecturer, Department of Highway and Transportation, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Haryati Yaacob PhD, Lecturer, Department of Highway and Transportation, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Che Ros Ismail Lecturer, Department of Highway and Transportation, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Nur Zurairahetty Mohd Yunus PhD, Lecturer, Department of Highway and Transportation, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v65.2156

Keywords:

Crumb rubber modified asphalt mixtures, crumb rubber, dry process, rutting, wheel tracking

Abstract

This study presents a laboratory evaluation on the properties of crumb rubber modified asphalt mixture using a dry process method in which the fine crumb rubber is added to substitute the aggregates portion and acts as elastic aggregates within the mix. The effect of crumb rubber in the mixture was investigated in terms of the volumetric properties using Marshall Mix Design and rutting performance using Wheel Tracking Test. The crumb rubber was added between 1 to 3% in steps of 1% by weight of aggregates to modify a dense graded mix, Asphaltic Concrete (AC14) and a gap graded mix, Stone Mastic Asphalt (SMA14) according to the Malaysian mix design. Based on the result, it was observed that the performance of the asphalt mixtures was significantly affected with the addition of crumb rubber. Rubberised asphalt mixtures for AC14 were found to have a greater resistance on rutting deformation compared to the conventional mixture. However, the use of fine rubber in SMA14 mixture with 80/100 bitumen cannot provide enough binder modification to perform as good as conventional SMA14 mixture with polymer modified bitumen. Furthermore, based on detailed review, a set of procedures for producing dry mixed rubberised asphalt mixture was identified and recommended for future studies.

References

Takallou, H. B., & Hicks, R. G. (1988). Development of improved mix and construction guidelines for rubber-modified asphalt pavements. Transportation Research Record 1171, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 113-120.

Esch, D. C. (1984). Asphalt pavements modified with coarse rubber particle - Design, construction and ice control observations. Alaska (Report No. FHWA-AK-RD-85-07). U.S. Department of Transportation: The Federal Highway Administration.

Takkalou, H. B., Hicks, R. G., & Esch, D. C. (1985). An effect of mix ingredient on the behavior of rubber-modified mixes (Report No. FHWA-AK-RD-86-05A). U.S. Department of Transportation: The Federal Highway Administration.

Koh, M. I. and Talib, N. (2006). Use of Scrapped Tires as a Substitute for Fine Aggregates in Asphaltic Pavement. National Seminar on Civil Engineering Research.

Elliott, R. P. (1993). Recycled Tire Rubber in Asphalt Mixes. Project Proposal Submitted to the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.

Heitzman, M.A. (1992). State of the practice for the design and construction of asphalt paving materials with crumb rubber additive (Report No. FHWA-SA-92-022). U.S. Department of Transportation: The Federal Highway Administration.

Epps, J. A. (1994). Uses of Recycled Rubber Tires in Highways – A Synthesis of Highway Practice. NCHRP Report No. 198.

Rebala, S. and Estakhri, C. K. (1995). Laboratory Evaluation of CRM Mixtures Designed Using TxDOT Mixture Design Method. Transportation Research Record No. 1515.

Cao, W.D. (2007). Study on properties of recycled tire rubber modified asphalt mixture using dry process. Construction and Building Materials, 21, 1011-1015.

Olivares F., Schultz B., Fernández, M., & Moro, B. (2009). Rubber-modified hot mix asphalt pavement by dry process. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 10(4), 277-288.

Stroup-Gardiner, M., Chadbourn, B. C., & Newcomb, D. E. (1996). Babbitt, Minnesota: Case study of pretreated crumb rubber modified asphalt concrete. Transportation Research Record 1530, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 34-42.

Stroup-Gardiner, M., Newcomb, D.E., & Tanquist, B. (1993). Asphalt-rubber interactions. Transportation Research Record 1417, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 99-108.

Troy, K., Sebaaly, P. and Epps, J. (1996). Evaluation Systems for Crumb Rubber Modified Binders and Mixtures. Transportation Research Record, No. 1530, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.

Downloads

Published

2013-10-15

How to Cite

Evaluation on Mix Design and Rutting Resistance of Dry Mixed Rubberised Asphalt Mixtures. (2013). Jurnal Teknologi, 65(3). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v65.2156