COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF CONVENTIONAL STABILIZERS IN IMPROVING ENGINEERING BEHAVIOR OF EXPANSIVE SUBGRADES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/jurnalteknologi.v87.22547Keywords:
Expansive clay subgrades, sustainable stabilizing materials, soil stabilization, lime, cement, fly ash stabilizationAbstract
This paper addresses the critical issue of distress in flexible pavements built on expansive Black Cotton soil, where seasonal moisture variations lead to swelling and shrinking, posing a serious threat to durability. Despite extensive research utilizing conventional stabilizers such as cement, lime, and fly ash, the comparative effectiveness of these stabilizers remains uncertain. This study employs a comprehensive approach, integrating conventional tests and microanalysis techniques to assess the engineering behavior of stabilized expansive soil samples. The investigation includes tests like Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS) for strength evaluation, Free Swelling Index (FSI) for swelling potential estimation, and Atterberg’s limits for evaluating plasticity properties. Additionally, Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope (ESEM) microanalysis is employed to examine the morphology of uncured-unstabilized expansive soil samples and those stabilized with cement, lime, and fly ash after a 28-day curing period. Results indicate that cement emerges as the most effective stabilizer, significantly reducing swelling by up to 42% and increasing strength post-curing by a remarkable fivefold compared to unstabilized-uncured expansive soil. Lime demonstrates exceptional efficacy in reducing plasticity, diminishing Liquid Limit (LL) and Plasticity Index (PI) by 30% and 79%, respectively. In contrast, fly ash is identified as least effective stabilizer, displaying the lowest efficacy in reducing swelling, plasticity, and enhancing strength. Furthermore, the study extends its analysis to evaluate the impact of these stabilizers on rutting and fatigue life of pavements through Finite Element Analysis (FEA) using PLAXIS. The findings contribute valuable insights for practitioners and researchers seeking optimal stabilizer selection for expansive soil-based pavement projects.
References
World Bank, LPI Global Ranking. 2018. LPI Ranking Report, https://lpi.worldbank.org/international/global/2018.
B. Soundara and S. Selvakumar. 2020. Experimental Investigation on the Swelling Behavior of Expansive Soils with EPS Geofoam Inclusion. Indian Geotech. J. 50(4): 519-530. Doi: 10.1007/s40098-019-00385-3.
U. Chaduvula, B. V. S. Viswanadham, and J. Kodikara. 2016. Desiccation Cracking Behavior of Geofiber-Reinforced Expansive Clay. Geo-Chicago 2016. 368-377. Doi: 10.1061/9780784480144.036.
S. Selvakumar and B. Soundara. 2019. Swelling Behaviour of Expansive Soils with Recycled Geofoam Granules Column Inclusion. Geotext. Geomembranes. 47(1): 1-11. Doi: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2018.08.007.
J. Kwon, E. Tutumluer, and I. L. Al-Qadi. 2009. Validated Mechanistic Model for Geogrid Base Reinforced Flexible Pavements. J. Transp. Eng. 135(12): 915-926. Doi: 10.1061/(asce)te.1943-5436.0000046.
J. K. Thakur, J. Han, and R. L. Parsons. 2012. Creep Behavior of Geocell-reinforced Recycled Asphalt Pavement Bases, J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 25(10): 1533-1542. Doi: 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0000705.
A. K. Sharma and P. V. Sivapullaiah. 2012. Improvement of Strength of Expansive Soil with Waste Granulated Blast Furnace. GeoCongress 2012. 3920-3928.
A. Kuity and T. K. Roy. 2013. Utilization of Geogrid Mesh for Improving the Soft Subgrade Layer with Waste Material Mix Compositions. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 104: 255-263. Doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.118.
N. Tiwari and N. Satyam. 2021. Coupling Effect of Pond Ash and Polypropylene Fiber on Strength and Durability of Expansive Soil Subgrades: An Integrated Experimental and Machine Learning Approach. J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 13(5): 1101-1112. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2021.03.010.
K. A. Nadgouda and R. A. Hedge. 2010. The Effect of Lime Stabilization on Properties of Black Cotton Soil. Indian Geotechnical Conference. 511–514. https://gndec.ac.in/~igs/ldh/conf/2010/articles/t007.pdf.
M. Anaokar and S. Mhaiskar. 2019. Numerical Analysis of Lime Stabilized Capping under Embankments based on Expansive Subgrades. Heliyon. 5(9): e02473. Doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02473.
M. Anaokar and S. Mhaiskar. 2020. Experimental and Numerical Assessment of Efficacy of Lime Stabilized Capping Material In Controlling Swelling Displacements within Flexible Pavement Embankments. Heliyon. 6(9). Doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04961.
P. Kumar, B. Sharma and S. Radhey. 2004. Effect of Fly Ash on Engineering Properties of Expansive Soils. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. 130(7): 764-767. Doi: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(2004)130:7(764).
M. Mahedi, B. Cetin, and D. White. 2018. Performance Evaluation of Cement and Slag Stabilized Expansive Soils, Transportation Research Record,. 2672(52): 164-173. Doi: 10.1177/0361198118757439.
B. R. Phani Kumar and R. S. Sharma. 2004. Effect of Fly Ash on Engineering Properties of Expansive Soils, J. Geotech. Geoenvironmental Eng. 130(7): 764-767. Doi: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(2004)130:7(764).
O. P. Navagire, S. K. Sharma, and D. Rambabu. 2021. Stabilization of Black Cotton Soil with Coal Bottom Ash. Mater. Today Proc. 52(3): 979-985. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.10.447.
N. C. Consoli, M. Tonini de Araújo, S. Tonatto Ferrazzo, V. de Lima Rodrigues, and C. Gravina da Rocha. 2021. Increasing Density and Cement Content in Stabilization of Expansive Soils: Conflicting or Complementary Procedures for Reducing Swelling. Can. Geotech. J. 58(6): 866-878. Doi: 10.1139/cgj-2019-0855.
M. Anaokar and S. Mhaiskar. 2018. Evaluation of Swelling Control Parameters for Stabilized Expansive Soil Buffer Layers under Pavement Embankment, Int. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 5(1): 79-85. Doi: 10.31873/IJEAS.5.1.33.
IRC-37. 2018. Guidelines for the Design of Flexible Pavements (Fourth Revision). Indian Roads Congress, New Delhi, India.
M. R. Thompson. 1969. Engineering Properties of Lime-Soil Mixtures. J. Mater. ASTM. 4.
D. N. Little. 1999. Evaluation of Structural Properties of Lime Stabilized Soils and Aggregates.
S. K. Dash and M. Hussain. 2012. Lime Stabilization of Soils: Reappraisal. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2(6): 707-714. Doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT .1943-5533.0000431.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright of articles that appear in Jurnal Teknologi belongs exclusively to Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Penerbit UTM Press). This copyright covers the rights to reproduce the article, including reprints, electronic reproductions, or any other reproductions of similar nature.