An Exploratory Study of Malaysian Technology-based Firms Leadership Styles

Authors

  • Azlin Shafinaz Arshad Malaysian Academy of SME & Entrepreneurship Development (MASMED), Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia
  • Amran Rasli Faculty of Management and Human Resource Department, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Mastora Mustafar School of Technology Management & Logistic, College of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Nadhirah Norhalim Faculty of Management and Human Resource Department, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v64.2276

Keywords:

Ambidextrous leadership, technology-based firms, transactional leadership, transformational leadership.

Abstract

Leaders are effective when they are able to determine the success or failure of a firm. In a recent study on leadership styles within technology-based firms, three leadership styles have been identified; transformational, transactional and ambidextrous leadership.  The present study is conducted to determine the level of leadership styles of technology-based firms in Malaysia based on these three styles. A survey was conducted on 46 technology-based firms in Malaysia. The findings revealed that all constrcuts of leadership styles were found to be significant. Practical implications are discussed and suggestions for future research are made.

References

Ajagbe, M. A., Choi S. L., Aslan, S. A., Ismail, K. 2012. Investment in Technology Based Small and Medium Sized Firms in Malaysia: Roles For Commercial Banks. International Journal of Research in Management & Technology (IJRMT). 2(2): 147–153.

Arham, A. F & Muenjohn, N. 2012. Leadership and Organisational Performance in Malaysian SMEs: The Mediating Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation. Proceeding at Business and Information 2012. Sapporo, Japan, July 3–5. G31–41.

B. M. Bass & Avolio, B. J. 2004. Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire: Manual and Sample Set. 3rd ed. Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden.

Bass, B. M. 1985. Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. New York: Free Press

Cooper, S. 2006. Knowledge and Expertise for High-Technology Entrepreneurship: A Tale of Two Sectors, International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies. 1(1/2): 59–78

Cresswell, J. W. 2003. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Method Approaches. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Fiedler F. E. 1996. Research on Leadership Selection and Training: One View of the Future Administrative. Science Quarterly. 41(2): 241–250.

Gardner, L. and Stough, C. 2002. Examining the Relationship Between Leadership and Emotional Intelligence in Senior Level Managers. Leadership and Organization Development Journal. 23(1–2): 68–78

Glantz, J. 2002. Finding your Leadership Style. A Guide for Educators; Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Leedy ,P. and Ormrod, J. 2005. Practical Research: Planning and Design. 8th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice Hall.

Majid, I. A, Ismail, K and Cooper, S. 2011. Prevalence of Entrepreneurial Management Practices in Technology-Based Firms in Malaysia, African Journal of Business Management. 5(6): 2075–2082.

Marmaya, N. H., Hitam, M., Muhamad Torsiman, N. and Balakrishnan, B. KPD. 2011. Employees’ Perceptions of Malaysian Managers’ Leadership Styles and Organizational Commitment. African Journal of Business Management. 5(5): 1584–1588.

Massa, S and Testa, S. 2008. Innovation and SMEs: Misaligned Perspectives and Goals Among Entrepreneurs, Academics, And Policy Makers. Technovation. 28: 393–407 www.elsevier.com/locate/technovation. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2008.01.002.

Nahavandi, A. 2002. The Art and Science of Leadership. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Northouse P. G. 2007. Leadership: Theory and Practice. 4th ed. Sage Publications, London.

Nunnally, J. 1978. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Pallant, J. 2001. SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS For Windows (Version 10-11). Buckingham: Open University Press.

Rukmani, K., Ramesh, M. and J. Jayakrishan. 2010. Effect of Leadership Styles on Organizational Effectiveness. European Journal of Social Sciences. 15(3): 365–370.

Robbins, Stephen P. 2003. Management. French Forest, N.S.W, Pearson Education.

Roscoe, J. T. 1975. Fundamental Research Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: Holt.

Rosing, K., Frese, M., & Bausch, A. 2011. Explaining the Heterogeneity of the Leadership-Innovation Relationship: Ambidextrous Leadership. The Leadership Quarterly. 22(5): 956–974. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.07.014.

Schreuders, J. & Legesse, A. 2012. Organizational Ambidexterity: How Small Technology-based firms Balance Innovation and Support Organizational Ambidexterity. Technology Innovation Management Review. (February): 17–21.

Yang, C-W. 2008. The Relationships Among Leadership Styles, Entrepreneurial Orientation, and Business Performance. Managing Global Transitions. 6(3): 257–275.

Yildirim, H. & Serhat, S. 2011. Effects of Owners’ Leadership Style on Manufacturing Family Firms’ Entrepreneurial Orientation in the Emerging Economies: An Empirical Investigation in Turkey. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences. 32(32): 147–153.

Downloads

Published

2013-10-15

Issue

Section

Social Sciences

How to Cite

An Exploratory Study of Malaysian Technology-based Firms Leadership Styles. (2013). Jurnal Teknologi, 64(3). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v64.2276