The Critical Factors for the Successful Transformation of Technology from Developed to Developing Countries

Authors

  • Malik Farrukh Bashir Ahmad Mallana Faculty of Management, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Abeda Muhammad Iqbal Faculty of Management, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Saima Iqbal Faculty of Management, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Adnan Shahid Khan UTM-MIMOS Center of Excellence, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Aslan Amat Senin Faculty of Management, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v64.2278

Keywords:

Technology transfer, barriers in technology transfer, success factors, technological competency

Abstract

The importance of international technology transfer (ITT) for economic development can hardly be overstated. Both the acquirement of technology and its dissemination foster productivity growth. As invention and creation processes remain overwhelmingly the province of the OECD countries, most developing countries must rely largely on imported technologies as sources of new productive knowledge. However, considerable amounts of follow-on innovation and adaptation occur in such countries. This paper explores recent international technology transfer issues between developed and developing countries. The paper will investigate technology transfer from the perspective of innovation systems, and identify critical components for the successful transformation of technology. Based on literature, findings emphasize on the development of learning system to overcome the barriers and promote international technology transfer in the long run. The focus of this paper is to study government’s technology policy and its influence on international technology transfer as well. Due to the ever changing environment of world politics and economy, there are numerous uncertainties in policy making for every country. It is not uncommon some policies cannot meet government’s original requirement as they were legislated. The rapid development of high technology has made stable technology policy a difficult task. Therefore, it is necessary to study the causal factors and intrinsic relationship of issues involved.

References

Abeda et al. 2011. Designing of Success Criteria-based Evaluation Model for Assessing the Research Collaboration between University and Industry. International Journal of Business Research and Management (IJBRM). 2(2): 59–73.

Andrzej H. Jasinski. 2009. Barriers for Technology Transfer: The Case of a Country in Transition. Journal Of Technology. Management In China. 4(2): 119–131.

Abbott, p.g. 1985. Technology Transfer in the Construction Industry Infrastructure and Industrial Development, Special Report No.223. The Economist Intelligence Unit, The Economist Publications Ltd, London.

BIS Department for Business, Innovation & Skills. 2010. White Paper on Local Growth: Realizing Every Place’s Potential. HMSO, London.

Bradbury, f.r. 1978. Technology Transfer Practice of International Firms, Sijthoff & Noordhoff International Publishers bv, The Netherlands

Egbu, c. 2000. Knowledge Management in Construction Smes: Coping with the Issues of Structure, Culture, Commitment and Motivation. Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Conference of Association of Researcher in Construction Management (Arcom), Glasgow. Caledonian University, 6–8 September 2000.

Elijido-Ten, E., Kloot, L., Clarkson, P. 2010. Extending the Application of Stake- Holder Influence Strategies to Environmental Disclosures. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability. 23(8): 1032–1059.

Etzkowitz, H., Goktepe-Hulten, D. 2010. Maybe They Can? University Technology Transfer Offices as Regional Growth Engines. International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialization. 9(2): 166–176.

Hamel. 1990. Technology Transfer on Joint Venture Projects in Developing Countries.

F. C. Cilingir. 1984. Technology Transfer To Malaysia Via Multinational And Joint Venture Companies. Jurnal Teknologi. 6: 18–30.

Jasinski, a.h. 2000. Technology Transfer in Poland: A Poor State of Affairs and a Wavering Policy. Science and Public Policy. No. 4.

Maitland, a. 1999. Management of Knowledge Management: Lessons Can Be Learned Failed Attempts to Capture and Use Employees’ Knowledge, Management and Technology. The Financial Times.

McAdam, R., McAdam, M., Brown, V. 2009. Proof of Concept Processes in UK University Technology Transfer: An Absorptive Capacity Perspective. R&D Management. 39(2): 111–130.

Samli, a. 1985. Technology Transfer: Geographic, Economic, Cultural and Technical Dimensions, Greenwood Press, Westport, Ct.

S. Callahan. 2008. Want to Manage Tacit Knowledge? Communities of Practice Offer a Versatile Solution White Paper, 2008. 1–8. http://www.anecdote.com.au/papers/Want_to_manage_tacit_knowledge.pdf Retrieval date: July 16.

Pries, F., Guild, P. 2011. Commercializing Inventions Resulting From University Research: Analyzing the Impact of Technology Characteristics on Subsequent Business Models. Technovation. 31(4): 151–160.

Yin, R. 2009. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage, London.

Downloads

Published

2013-10-15

Issue

Section

Social Sciences

How to Cite

The Critical Factors for the Successful Transformation of Technology from Developed to Developing Countries. (2013). Jurnal Teknologi, 64(3). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v64.2278