Performance of PSf Ultrafiltration Membrane: Effect of Different Nonsolvent on Coagulation Medium

Authors

  • Muhamad Fikri Shohur Department of Materials and Design Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, 86400 Parit Raja, Johor, Malaysia
  • Zawati Harun Advanced Materials and Manufacturing Centre (AMMC), Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, 86400 Parit Raja, Johor, Malaysia
  • W. J. Lau Advanced Membrane Technology Research Centre (AMTEC), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Muhamad Zaini Yunos Department of Materials and Design Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, 86400 Parit Raja, Johor, Malaysia
  • Mohd Riduan Jamalludin Advanced Materials and Manufacturing Centre (AMMC), Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, 86400 Parit Raja, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v65.2329

Keywords:

Polysulfone (PSf), polyethelene glycols (PEG), sodium sulphate (Na2SO4), potassium chloride (KCl)

Abstract

One of the big challenges in developing a good asymmetric membrane  is macrovoid formation that leads to reduction of rejection value.  The most common method to reduce or suppress macrovoid formation is by addition of controlled solvent to the coagulation bath. Therefore, the effect of difference coagulants based on dissolved KCl (monovalent) and dissolved Na2SO4(divalent) with different concentration onto asymmetric Polysulfone (PSf) ultrafiltration membrane was investigated in this work. The PSf ultrafiltration membranes were prepared by using phase inversion method using these two immerse aqueous solutions. The performances of membranes were evaluated via pure water flux (distilled water) and solute rejection (humic acid). Results on the cross section revealed that the structure of membrane show a straight pattern of bigger finger-like pore structure from top to bottom layer tend to reduce with at the same time the diameter of finger-like pore structure  also increased, as salt medium of coagulant increases. These obviously shown by permeation values for both salt mediums were higher compared to without salt coagulant. This reduction of finger-like structure at bottom layer occurred along together with the formation of sponge shape structure. The growth of thick sponge shape is strongly influence by kinetic phase inversion of salt coagulant that also creates resistance to permeation mechanism. However the intense salt coagulant medium can cause the bigger sponge structure that will slightly reduce rejection and increase the permeation.  This was proved by the rejection of KCl medium started to increase at 1-3% but slightly reduced at 4%. Based on the result analysis demonstrated that the ideal membrane with highest rejection and good permeation values was membrane immersed into 1% Na2SO4 coagulation medium.

References

Z. Harun, M. F. Shohur, M. Z. Yunos, M. R. Jamalludin, and A. F. Ismail. 2013 . Advance Material Research. 328:798–801.

Z. Harun, M. R. Jamalludin, M. Z. Yunos, M. F. Shohur, and A. F. Ismail. 2013. Advance. Material. Research. 701: 319–322.

M. Z. Yunos, Z. Harun, H. Basri. and A. F. Ismail. 2012. Advance . Material. Research. 488–489: 46–50.

A. Idris, I. Ahmed, and M. A. Limin, 2010. Desalination. 25: 805–809.

A. Rahimpour, S. S. Madaeni, and Y. Mansourpanah. 2010. Desalination. 258: 79–86.

M. F. Shohur, Z. Harun, Z. Yunos, S. Hasan, and R. Jamalludin. 2013. Applied. Mechanic and. Materials. 372: 3–7.

M. R. Jamalludin, Z. Harun, H. Basri, M. Z. Yunos, and M. F. Shohur. 2013. Applied Mechanic and Materials. 372: 8–12.

S. H. Mohamad, M. I. Idris, H. Z. Abdullah, and A. F. Ismail. 2013. Advance Materials Research. 795: 318–323.

Kang Li. 2007. Ceramic Membrane for Separation and Reaction. John Wiley and Sons, West Sussex,

N. F. Ismail, Z. Harun, N. A. Badarulzaman. 2012 International. Journal. of Integrated Eng. 4: 16–21.

Z. Harun, N. F. Ismail, N. A. Badarulzaman. 2012 Advance Materials Research. 488–489: 335–33.

T. Mohammadi and E. Saljoughi. 2009. Desalination. 243: 1–7.

Drioli, E. and L. 2009. Membrane Operations. Wiley.

D. B. Mosqueda-Jimenez, R. M. Narbaitz, T. Matsuura, G. Chowdhury, G. Pleizier, and J. P. Santerre. 2004 J. Membr. Sci. 231: 209–224.

J. Bumsuk, Y.J. Ki, K. Bokyung, R. Hee-Woo.2005. J. Membr. Sci. 246: 67–76.

M. Wang, L. Wu, and C. Gao.2006. J. Membr. Sci. 270: 154–161.

S. Yang and Z. Liu. 2003. J. Membr. Sci. 222: 87–98.

J. F. Hester and A. M. Mayes. 2002. J. Membr. Sci 202:119–135.

Y. Termonia. 2002. Polymer. 50: 1062–1066.

H. Jai, J. Won, H. Lee, and Y. Soo. 2002. J. Membr. Sci. 196: 267–277.

G. Arthanareeswaran, D. Mohan, and M. Raajenthiren. 2007. App. Sur. Sci. 253: 8705–8712.

J.-H. Kim and K.-H. Lee. 1998. J. Membr. Sci. 138: 153–163.

B. Chakrabarty, A. K. Ghoshal, and M. K. Purkait. 2008. J. Membr. Sci. 309: 209–221.

Y. Ma, F. Shi, J. Ma, M. Wu, J. Zhang, and C. Gao. 2011. Desalination. 272: 51–58.

A. Conesa, T. Gumi, and C. Palet. 2007. J. Membr. Sci. 287: 29–40.

Downloads

Published

2013-11-15

How to Cite

Performance of PSf Ultrafiltration Membrane: Effect of Different Nonsolvent on Coagulation Medium. (2013). Jurnal Teknologi, 65(4). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v65.2329