Numerical Estimation of Hollow Fiber Membrane for Mobile Water Treatment

Authors

  • Nurmin Bolong Nano Engineering and Materials Research Group (NEMs),School of Engineering and Information Technology, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Jalan UMS, 88400 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia
  • Rosdianah Ramli Nano Engineering and Materials Research Group (NEMs),School of Engineering and Information Technology, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Jalan UMS, 88400 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia
  • Janice Lynn Ayog Civil Engineering Programme, School of Engineering and Information Technology, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Jalan UMS, 88400 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia
  • Abu Zahrim Yasser Chemical Engineering Programme, School of Engineering and Information Technology, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Jalan UMS, 88400 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v65.2339

Keywords:

Hollow fiber, ultrafiltration, mobile water treatment operation, numerical estimation and optimization, response surface method

Abstract

In the application of water treatment system, membrane has gained favour in the industry as well as in the research field. In pressure-driven category, ultrafiltration membrane with pore size of 3 to 10 nm is one of the choices for water treatment application. With the advantages of being compacted and self-supporting, hollow fiber membrane configuration has been widely used as ultrafiltration membrane. This is an important feature for a mobile water treatment system developed in this work. The mobile water treatment system is investigated in terms of its operational performance focusing for simple setup configuration. Mobility of the membrane treatment system in this work is aim to develop a stand-alone membrane water treatment system that can operates without electricity. Therefore, the system targeted to be a self-sufficient in rural areas where electricity and delivery of spare parts are difficult. A membrane filtration system with outside-in hollow fiber membrane is developed.  The numerical approach of Response Surface Method (RSM) is used to estimate and optimize the flux performance in this work. The operating conditions i.e transmembrane pressure (TMP) as well as the local condition (water temperature) were considered in the numerical estimation. The initial numerical estimation found that the developed mobile system has permeate flux range from 0.422 L/m2h up to 3.035 L/m2h for local temperature of 20˚C to 35˚C and further optimization were discussed in this study.

References

P. J. Smith, S. Vigneswaran, H. H. Ngo, R. Ben-Aim, H. Nguyen. 2006. Journal of Membrane Science. 278: 381.

X. Guo, Z. Zhang, L. Fang, L. Su. 2009. Desalination. 238: 183.

A. F. Ismail, S. N. Kumari. 2004. Journal of Membrane Science. 236: 183.

H. Strathmann. 2000. Introduction to Membrane Science and Technology. University of Colorado at Boulder.

T. Oe, H. Koide, H. Hirokawa, K. Okukawa. 1996. Desalination. 106: 107.

N. Bolong. 2009. Charged Surface Modifying Macromolecules Hollow Fiber Nanofiltration Membrane for the Removal of Bisphenol-A in Domestic Wastewater. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

H. M. Yeh, T. W. Cheng, H. H. Wu. 1998. Separation and Purification Technology. 12: 171.

B. K. Thakur, S. De. 2012. Separation and Purification Technology. 93: 67.

A. E. Childress, P. Le-Clech, J. L. Daughtery, C. Chen, G. L. Leslie. 2005. Desalination. 180: 5.

E. Barbot, E. Carretier, Y. Wyart, B. Marrot, P. Moulin. 2009. Desalination. 248: 58.

G. F. Crozes, J. G. Jacangelo, C. Anselme, J. M. Laîné. 1997. Journal of Membrane Science. 124: 63.

K. Guerra, J. Pellegrino, J. E. Drewes. 2012. Separation and Purification Technology. 87: 47.

J. C. Crittenden, R. R. Trussell, D. W. Hand, K. J. Howe, G. Tchobanoglous. 2012. Water Treatment: Principles and Design. New Jersey: Wiley.

M. Rajca, M. Bodzek, K. Konieczny. 2009. Desalination. 239: 100.

N. K. Shammas, L. K. Wang. 2011. Membrane and Desalination Technologies. New York: Springer.

N. F. Razali, A. W. Mohammad, N. Hilal, C. P. Leo, J. Alam. 2013. Desalination. 311: 182

M. J. Anderson, P. J. Whitcomb. 2005. Response Surface Methods (RSM) for Peak Process Performance at the Most Robust Operating Conditions. Minneapolis: Stat-ease.

S. Xia, X. Li, R. Liu, G. Li. 2004. Desalination. 167: 23.

Downloads

Published

2013-11-15

How to Cite

Numerical Estimation of Hollow Fiber Membrane for Mobile Water Treatment. (2013). Jurnal Teknologi, 65(4). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v65.2339