Developing LEP Oral Fluency with a Dialogue Template

Authors

  • Mardiana Idris Faculty of Education, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Mohamad Hassan Zakaria Language Academy, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v65.2352

Keywords:

Dialogue template, oral fluency, speech rate and pause

Abstract

Dialogue template (DT) is a fluency tool, conceptualized based on chunking and template theories to aid limited English proficiency (LEP) learners in their fluency practice. This article shares findings of learners’ gain scores on their speech rate (SR) and average length of pause (ALP) after a month of instructional intervention. Qualitative analyses found teacher’s observation and participants’ responses converged in three aspects of DT efficacy: SR improvement, chunks-assisted practice and sense of confidence. Findings are discussed in relation to its practical implications in the classroom as well as beyond the study, particularly on chunks analysis, pausing phenomena and alternative fluency tool.

References

Adolphs, S. & Schmitt, N. 2004. Vocabulary Coverage According to Spoken Context. In P.Bogaards, P. Laufer, B. (Eds.). Vocabulary in a Second Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 39–49.

Blake, C.G. 2006. The Potential of Text-based Internet Chats for Improving ESL Oral Fluency. PhD dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana. Boston, MA: Heinle.

Bygate, M. 2001. Speaking. In R. Carter & D. Nunan (Eds.). The Cambridge Guide to Teaching English Speakers of Other Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 14–10.

Carter, R. 2004. Language and Creativity: The Art of Common Talk. London: Routledge.

Christopher Stillwell et al. 2010. Students Transcribing Tasks: Noticing Fluency, Accuracy, and Complexity. ELT Journal. 64/4: 445–455.

De Bot, K. 1992 A Bilingual production model: Levelt’s Speaking Model Adapted. Applied Linguistics. 13: 1–24.

Derwing, T.M., Rossiter, M. J., Munro, M. J., & Thomson, R.I. 2004. Second Language Fluency: Judgements on Different Tasks. Language Learning. 54/4: 655–679.

Deterding, D. 2001. The Measurement of Rhythm: A Comparison of Singapore and British English. Journal of Phonetics. 29: 217–230.

Ellis, R. & Barkhuizen, G. 2005. Analyzing Learner Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Freed, B. F., Segalowitz, N. & Dewey, D.P. 2004. Context of Learning and Second Language Fluency in French–Comparing Regular Classroom, Study Abroad and Intensive Domestic Immersion Programs. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 26: 275–301.

Gobet, F. & Simon, H. A. 1996. Templates in Chess Memory: A Mechanism for Recalling Several Boards. Cognitive psychology. 31: 1–40.

Gobet, F, Lane, P. C. R. Croker, S. Cheng, P. C. H Jones, G. Oliver, I & Pine, J.M. 2001. Chunking Mechanism in Human Learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 5/6: 236–243.

Gobet, F. & Jackson, S. 2002. In Search of Templates. Cognitive Systems Research. 3: 35–44.

Leedham, M. 2006. “Do I Speak Better?†A Longitudinal Study of Lexical Chunking in the Spoken Language of Two Japanese Students. The East Asian Learner. 2/2: 1–15.

Lennon, P. 2002. The Lexical Element on Spoken Second Language Fluency. In H. Riggenbach (Ed.). Perspectives on Fluency Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. 25–42.

Lewis, M. 1997. Implementing the Lexical Approach: Putting Theory into Practice. Hove: Language Teaching Publications.

Lewis, M. 2002. Implementing the Lexical Approach: Putting Theory into Practice. Boston, MA: Heinle.

Luoma, S. 2004. Assessing Speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

McCarthy, M. 2006. Explorations in Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nation, I.S.P. 2001. Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Owens, R.E, Jr. 2008. Language Development – and Introduction. 7th Ed. USA: Pearson Education, Inc.

Ranta, L. & Derwing, T.M. 2000. Accuracy, Fluency and Learner Style. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Association of Applied Linguistics, Vancouver, British Colombia, Canada.

Richards, J.C. 2008. Moving Beyond the Plateau–From Intermediate to Advanced Levels in Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Segalowitz, N. 2003. Automaticity and Second Language Acquisition. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.). The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. 382–408.

Servan-Schreiber, E. & Anderson, J.R. 1990. Learning Artificial Grammars with Competitive Chunking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 16: 592–608.

Skehan, P. 1998. A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Swain, M. 1985. Communicative Competence: Some Roles of Comprehensible Input and Comprehensible Output in Its Development. In Gass, S.M. and C. Madden (Eds.). Input in Second Language Acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Trofimovich, P. & Baker, W. 2006. Learning Second Language Suprasegmentals: Effect of L2 Experience on Prosody and Fluency Characteristics of L2 Speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 28: 1–30.

Van Loon, J. 2002) Improving Pronunciation of Adult ESL Students. TESL Canada Journal. 20/1: 83–88.

Vygotsky. L. 1986. Thought and Language. Trans. A. Kozulin. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

Downloads

Published

2013-11-15

Issue

Section

Social Sciences

How to Cite

Developing LEP Oral Fluency with a Dialogue Template. (2013). Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 65(2). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v65.2352