EFFECT OF STIRRUPS AT BEAM CROSSINGS USING COCOPEAT AS A CONCRETE AGGREGATE SUBSTITUTE FOR SAND

Authors

  • T. Q. K. Lam Faculty of Civil Engineering, Mien Tay Construction University, 85000, Vinh Long, Vietnam
  • T. A. Le Construction and Network Department, Sai Gon Joint Stock Commercial Bank (SCB), 85000, Vinh Long, Vietnam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jurnalteknologi.v87.23642

Keywords:

Stirrup, load-bearing capacity, TCVN 5574:2018, cocopeat, aggregate, concrete

Abstract

Stirrups are included at the intersections of beams, with secondary beams supported by the main beams or positioned where concentrated forces are significant. Additional stirrups must be arranged to enhance the load-bearing capacity at these beam intersections. At these beam intersections, it is necessary to arrange additional stirrups to support the reaction force generated by the secondary beams. At the intersections of the main beams, it is necessary to arrange additional stirrups on the section b+2h (where b and h represent the width and height of the main beam). The use of the stirrup arrangement at the beam intersection, as outlined in the TCVN 5574:2018 standard, has been subject to limited experimental studies. These studies aim to assess whether the stirrup placement at the beam intersection is both reasonable and optimal for ensuring adequate load-bearing capacity in this area. Furthermore, it is essential to investigate the impact of incorporating cocopeat as a partial substitute for sand aggregate in the concrete concerning the performance of these intersecting beams. The research results examined the formation and propagation of cracks, established the relationships between load-vertical displacement and load-compressive (tensile) deformation, explored the impact of additional stirrup arrangements on the behavior of seven experimental reinforced concrete beams, and utilized cocopeat as a sand substitute in concrete with beam dimensions of 0.15×0.2×1.2 m.

References

Vietnam Standard. 2012. TCVN 5574: 2012. Concrete and Reinforced Concrete Structures - Design Standard.

National Building Code of Russia. 1997. SNiP 2.03.01-84 Concrete and Reinforced Concrete Structures - Design Standards.

P. N. Dung and L. T. T. Ha. 2014. Analysis and Design of Reinforced Concrete Beams Subjected to Bending on Inclined Section according to AIC 318, EUROCODE 2 and TCVN 5575:2012. Journal of Building Science and Technology. 3: 6372.

American Concrete Institute. 2008. ACI 318 – 08. Building Code Requirements for Structural concrete (ACI 318 – 08) and Commentary.

Eurocode 2. 2004. EN1992-1-1. Design of Concrete Structures – Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings.

N. B. N. Thao and T. N. Quan. 2021. Experimental Study on Improving Shear Capacity of Reinforced Concrete Beam by Inclined Stirrups. Journal of science of Lac Hong University. 13: 8489.

Vietnam Standard. 2018. TCVN 5574: 2018. Design of Concrete and Reinforced Concrete Structures.

F. Autrup, H. B. Joergensen and L. C. Hoàng. 2022. Experimental Investigation of the Influence of Stirrup Spacing on the Shear Capacity of Reinforced Concrete Beams. Proceedings of the 14th fib International PhD Symposium in Civil Engineering, Rome-Italy. 4956.

SP 63.13330. 2012. Concrete and Reinforced Concrete Structures General, Russian Federation Ministry of Regional Development, 2012.

SP 63.13330. 2012. Concrete and Reinforced Concrete Structures.

E. N. Kodysh, N. N. Trekin, I. K. Nikitin and K. E. Sosedov. 2017. Practical Methods and Examples of Calculation of Reinforced Concrete Structures Made of Heavy Concrete according to SP 63.13330, Moscow.

P. Q. Minh, N. T. Phong, N. T. Thang and V. M. Tung. 2021. Reinforced Concrete Structures (Basic Structural Components) TCVN 5574:2018. Science and Technology Publishing House.

Hanoi University of Civil Engineering. 2021. Instructions for Calculating Reinforced Concrete Structures according to TCVN 5574:2018 Standard. Science and Technology Publishing House.

B. Q. Bao. 2020. Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures according to TCVN 5574:2018. Construction Publishing House.

L. B. Hue. 2018. Recommendation on the Calculation of Stirrup of Reinforced Concrete Beams Subjected to Concentrated Forces Conforming to SP63.13330.2012. 3: 7478.

L. B. Hue, P. M. Tuan. 2022. A New Method to Design Stirrups of Reinforced Concrete Beams Subjected to Concentrated Loads according to TCVN 5574:2018. Journal of Science and Technology in Civil Engineering. 16(3V): 6073. Doi: 10.31814/stce.huce(nuce)2022-16(3V)-05.

Prime Minister of Vietnam. (2020). Decision No. 1266/QĐ-TTg Approving the Strategy for the Development of Vietnam’s Building Materials for the 2021–2030 Period, with Orientations Toward 2050. Effective January 1, 2021. Official Gazette of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam.

C. Baley. 2002. Analysis of the Flax Fibres Tensile Behaviour and Analysis of the Tensile Stiffness Increase. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing. 33(7): 939948. Doi: 10.1016/S1359-835X(02)00040-4.

H. Savastano Jr., P. G Warden, R. S. P. Coutts. 2003. Mechanically Pulped Sisal as Reinforcement in Cementitious Matrices. Cement and Concrete Composites. 25(3): 311319. Doi: 10.1016/S0958-9465(02)00055-0.

R. D. T. Filho, K. Scrivener, G.L. England, K. Ghavami, 2000. Durability of Alkali-sensitive Sisal and Coconut Fibres in Cement Mortar Composites. Cement and Concrete Composites. 22(2): 127143. Doi: 10.1016/S0958-9465(99)00039-6.

A. Zaki, O. Fiardi and K. W. Nindhita. 2024. Evaluation of the Addition of Coconut Fiber Variations in Corroded Concrete Mechanical Properties. E3S Web of Conf. 559: 04027. Doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202455904027.

Khai, C. Y., Mohammad N. N., Mohd R., M. L. F., Md Dan, M. F., & Abu Talib, M. K. 2024. The Comparison of Performance of Root Vetiver Grass between Coconut Fiber and Eggshell toward Slope Stabilization. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Mechanics. 125(1): 185–191. Doi: 10.37934/aram.125.1.185191.

Samina. M. K., Ashok R. M., Vijay S. S., Sonal V. S. and Vaibhav V. S. 2024. A Study of the Effect of Coconut Fiber on Reinforced Concrete Beams Subjected to Combined Bending and Shear. WJAETS. 13(01): 556–568. Doi: 10.30574/wjaets.2024.13.1.0432.

Lakshmi Kant et al. 2024. Enhancement of Mechanical Strength in Lightweight EPS Geopolymer Composites using Coconut Fiber. Eng. Res. Express. 6: 035118. Doi: 10.1088/2631-8695/ad6eeb.

A. Kriker, G. Debicki, A. Bali, K. Mouldi and M. Chabannet. 2005. Mechanical Properties of Date Palm Fibres and Concrete Reinforced with Date Palm Fibres in Hot-dry Climate. Cement and Concrete Composites. 27(5): 554564. Doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2004.09.015.

L. H. V. Thanh, T. C. Y. Nhi, H. T. K. Hue, et al. 2020. Improvement of the Permeable Concrete from Cockle, Rice Husk Ash and Coir Pith. The University of Danang - Journal of Science and Technology. 18(5.1): 1115.

N. M. Trieu. 2024. Research on the Method of Hardening Coco Peat Granules to Replace Sand Aggregate in Concrete. JSTE-MTU. 10: 6479.

Vietnam Standard. 1999TCVN 6476:1999. Interlocking concrete bricks. Ministry of Science and Technology.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-22

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

EFFECT OF STIRRUPS AT BEAM CROSSINGS USING COCOPEAT AS A CONCRETE AGGREGATE SUBSTITUTE FOR SAND. (2025). Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 87(5), 1025-1035. https://doi.org/10.11113/jurnalteknologi.v87.23642