A Comparative Study on EIA process in Malaysia, West Australia, New Zealand and Canada

Authors

  • Maisarah Makmor Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
  • Zulhabri Ismail Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Darul Ehsan, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v70.2378

Keywords:

Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), EIA process, comparative study

Abstract

The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) has become an essential tool in promoting sustainable development and environmental protection since it was formally introduced by National Environmental Policy (NEPA) in 1969. The acceptance and application of EIA as a key tool in ensuring green development was overwhelming and has reflected positive feedbacks since its first introduction to the world community. The implementation of the EIA in various countries differs from one another as each country customised their own EIA process to cater their local development. This paper highlights the essentials of Environmental Impact Assessment and the EIA processes that have been adapted in four countries namely, Malaysia, West Australia, New Zealand and Canada. The three developed countries have been chosen because they share the same legal system as Malaysia which is the common law. The objective of this paper is to analyse the differences and the similarities between the EIA processes in the four chosen countries. The analysis was carried out by utilising a comparative study which was achieved via literature review. The comparative study reveals the similarities and differences of each EIA process implemented in the four countries. Conclusively, the four countries possessed few similarities such as each country has their own legal instrument, a governing body responsible in administering their local EIA process and incorporates public participation in the EIA process. However, the Canadian EIA process has a more notable EIA process between the four EIA processes, whereby, it possesses the most elaborate process which involves public participation at every level and takes up to 365 days for the EIA assessment.  

Author Biographies

  • Maisarah Makmor, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
    Postgraduate Student, Faculty of Architecture, Planning and Surveying, UiTM Shah Alam
  • Zulhabri Ismail, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
    Senior Lecturer, Faculty of Architecture, Planning and Surveying, UiTM Shah Alam

References

Author. 2012.

Darus, Z. M., A. K. A. Rashid, N. A. Hashim, Z. Omar, M. Saruwono and N. Mohammad. 2009. Development of Sustainable Campus: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Planning and Strategy. WSEAS Transaction on Environment and Development. 5(3): 273–282.

Grisworld, E. 2012. How 'Silent Spring' Ignited the Environmental Movement. The New York Times.

Ogola, P. F. A. 2007. Environmental Impact Assessment General Procedures. Paper presented at the Short Course II on Surface Exploration for Geothermal Resources, Lake Navaisha, Kenya. 1–6.

Morrison-Saunders, A., and F. Retief. 2012. Walking the Sustainability Assessment Talk-progressing the Practice of Environment Impact Assessment (EIA). Environment Impact Assessment Review. 36: 34–41.

Bhatt, R. P., and S. N. Khanal. 2010. Environment Impact Assessment System and Process: A Study on Policy and Legal Instrument in Nepal. Journal of Environment Science and Technology. 4(9): 586–594.

Bhatia, R., and A. Wernham. 2008. Integrating Human Health into Environmental Impact Assessment: An Unrealized Opportunity for Environmental Health and Justice. Environmental Health Perspectives. 116(8): 991–1000.

Lemmer, J. A. 2007. Cleaning up Development: EIA in Two of the World's Largest and Most Rapidly Developing Countries. The Georgetown International Environmental Law Review. 19(2): 275–301.

Glasson, J., R. Therivel, and A. Chadwi, (Eds.). 2005. Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment. 3rd ed. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge.

Cashmore, M. 2004. The Role of Science in Environment Impact Assessment: Process and Procedure Versus Purpose in the Development of Theory. Environment Impact Assessment Review. 24: 403–426.

Chesoh, S. 2011. Environmental Impact Assessment of Power Development Project: Lessons from Thailand Experiences. Asian Social Science. 7(9): 119–123.

Saldanha, L. F., A. Naik, A. Joship, and S. Sastry. 2011. Green Tapism: A Review of the Environmental Impact Assessment Notification. Social Change. 41(1): 171–181.

Tang, S. Y., C. P. Tang, and C. W. H. Lo. 2005. Public Participation and Environmental Impact Assessment in Mainland China and Taiwan: Political Foundations of Environmental Management. Journal of Development Studies. 41(1): 1–32.

Coşkun, A. A., and O. Turker. 2011. Analysis of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 175: 213–226.

Gillespie, A. 2008. Environmental Impact Assessment in International Law. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law. 17(2): 221–233.

Phillips, J. 2011. The Conceptual Development of Geocybernetic Relationship Between Sustainable Development and Environment Impact Assessment. Applied Geography. 31: 969–979.

Peche, R., and E. Rodriguez. 2009. Environmental Impact Assessment Procedure: A New Approach Based on Fuzzy Logic. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 29: 275–283.

Bataneih, R. H. 2007. The Effectiveness of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Follow-up with Regard to Biodiversity Conservation in Azerbaijan. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal. 18(5): 591–596.

Kolhoff, A. J. P. P. J. Driessen and H. A. C. Runhaar. 2013. An Analysis Framework for Characterizing and Explaining Development of EIA Legislation in Developing Countries- Illustrated for Georgia, Ghana and Yemen. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 38: 1–15.

Tromans, S., and K. Fuller. 2003. Environmental Impact Assessment- Law and Practice. United Kingdom: Lexis Nexis.

Yusoff, H. N. 2013. Understanding Environmental Audit in the Public Sector: Malaysian Perspective. Jurnal Teknologi. 62(1): 25–30.

Lee, N., and C. George. (Eds.). 2000. Environmental Assessment in Developing and Transitional Countries: Principles, Methods and Practice. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Mustafa, M. 2011. The Role of Environmental Impact Assessment in Addressing Marine Environmental Issue Arising from Oil and Gas Activities: Examples from Malaysia. Paper presented at the 2011 International Conference on Environment and Bioscience (IPCBEE). Singapore. 58–62.

Memon, A. 2000. Devolution of Environmental Regulation: EIA in Malaysia. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 18: 283–293.

Briffet, C., J. Obbard and J. Mackee. 2004. Environment Assessment in Malaysia: a Means to an End or a New Beginning? Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 22(3): 221–233.

Nor, Y. M. 1991. Environmental Policy Making: Problems and Perspective in Malaysia. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 11: 129–142.

Ibrahim, M. 1992. The Use Of 'Prince System' in Minimizing The Environmental Damages in Mining Activities. Jurnal Teknologi. 20(1): 12–18.

Yusoff, S. and R. Hashim. 1996. A Case Study on an Environmental Impact Assessment in Malaysia. Transactions on Ecology and the Environment. 11: 161–168.

Author. 2012.

Said, A. M. 2008. Environmental Impact Assessment: Post Monitoring and Audit in Malaysia. University Publication Centre (UPENA). Shah Alam, Malaysia: UiTM.

DOE. 2010. Environment Requirements: A Guide For Investors, Department of Environment. Putrajaya: Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment. 1–82.

Foo, S. M., and M. R. Yusoff. 2002. Environmental Impact Assessment- Malaysia Perspectives. Paper presented at the SPE International Conference on Health, Safety and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 1–10.

DOE. 2012. Mandatory Preliminary Site Assessment for EIA Activities. Putrajaya: Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment.

Modak, P. and A. K. Biswas. 1999. EIA Procedure and Requirements in Malaysia in Conducting Environmental Impact Assessment in Developing Countries. Tokyo, Japan: United Nations University Press.

Emang, J. J. J. 2006. Public Participant in EIA process in Sarawak: Any Room for Improvement? Paper presented at the Fourth Sabah-Sarawak Environmental Convention. 1–8.

Burton, I., J. Wilson and R. E. Munn. 1983. Environmental Impact Assessment: National Approaches and International Needs. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 3: 133–150.

Sánchez, L. E and A. Morrison-Saunders. 2011. Learning about Knowledge Management for Improving Environmental Impact Assessment in a Government Agency: The Western Australia Experience. Journal of Environmental Management. 92: 2260–2271.

Morrison-Saunders, A. 2011. Principles for Effective Impact Assessment: Examples from Western Australia. Paper presented at the Impact Assessment and Responsible Development for Infrastructure, Business and Industry- 31st Annual Meeting of the International Association of Impact Assessment. Centro de Convenciones, Puebla, Mexico. 1–6.

Strijk, J. A. 2012. Environmental Impact Assessment (Part IV Division 1 and 2) Administrative Procedures 2012. State of Western Australia.

EPA. 2010. Presentation to Consultants and Decision Making Authorities. Environment Protection Authority. Ministry for Environment.

EPA. 2013. Assessment on Proponent's Information (API), Environment Protection Authority. Ministry for Environment.

EPA. 2013. Public Environmental Review (PER) Process. Environment Protection Authority. Ministry for Environment.

Dixon, J. E. 1993. The Integration of EIA and Planning in New Zealand: Changing Process and Practice. Journal of Environment Planning and Management. 36(2): 239–251.

Baba, A. 2003. Geothermal Environmental Impact Assessment with Special Reference to the Tuzla. Geothermal Area. Canakkale, Turkey: The United Nations University.

Scott, J., and J. M. Ngoran. 2003. Public Participation in Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) with Case Studies from: England, Denmark and New Zealand. International Masters Degree in Environmental Policy and the Global Challenge. Roskilde University. Roskilde, Denmark: 1–107.

Wood, C. (Ed.). 2003. Environmental Impact Assessment: A Comparative Review. Second ed. Canada: Pearson Education.

Wilson, A., S. Magill and K. D. Black. 2009. Environmental Impact Assessment and Monitoring in Aquaculture: FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper. Rome: FAO.

Noble, B. F. 2009. Promise and Dismay: The State of Strategic Environmental Assessment Systems and Practices in Canada. Environment Impact Assessment Review. 29: 66–75.

Sadar, M. H., and W. J. Stolte. 1996. An Overview of the Canadian Experience in Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). Impact Assessment. 14: 215–228.

Noble, B. F. 2002. The Canadian Experience with SEA and Sustainability. Environment Impact Assessment Review. 22: 3–17.

Paci, C., A. Tobin and P. Robb. 2002. Reconsidering the Canadian Environmental Impact Assessment Act: A Place for Traditional Environment Knowledge. Environment Impact Assessment Review. 22: 111–127.

Suebsiri, A. M. J. And M. Wilson. 2009. Should Life Cycle Assessment be part of the Environmental Impact Assessment? Case Study: EIA of CO2 Capture and Storage in Canada. Energy Procedia. 1: 4511–4518.

McCaig, K. 2005. Canadian Insights: The Challenges of an Integrated Environmental Assessment Framework. Environment Impact Assessment Review. 25: 737–746.

CEAA. 2013. Canadian Environmental Assessment Act 2012. Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency.

CEAA. 2013. Basics of Environmental Assessment. Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency.

Fitzpatrick, P. and A. J. Sinclair. 2009. Multi-jurisdictional Environmental Impact Assessment: Canadian Experience. Environment Impact Assessment Review. 29: 252–260.

CEAA. 2012. Guide to Preparing a Description of a Designated Project under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act. Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency.

Downloads

Published

2014-08-27

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

A Comparative Study on EIA process in Malaysia, West Australia, New Zealand and Canada. (2014). Jurnal Teknologi, 70(1). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v70.2378