FINE-TUNING DEA AMINE CONDITIONS FOR EFFICIENT CO₂ REMOVAL IN NATURAL GAS PROCESSING: A SIMULATION-BASED APPROACH

Authors

  • Ayyi Husbani Department of Petroleum Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic University of Riau, Jl. Kaharuddin Nasution No.113 Pekanbaru 28284, Indonesia
  • Dike Fitriansyah Putra ᵃDepartment of Petroleum Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic University of Riau, Jl. Kaharuddin Nasution No.113 Pekanbaru 28284, Indonesia ᵇFaculty of Chemical and Energy Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia ᶜCenter of Energy Studies (PSE), Islamic University of Riau, Pekanbaru 28284, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6772-130X
  • Fitrianti Fitrianti Department of Petroleum Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic University of Riau, Jl. Kaharuddin Nasution No.113 Pekanbaru 28284, Indonesia
  • Mohd. Zaidi Jaafar Faculty of Chemical and Energy Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9443-3071
  • Jesica Caroline ᵃDepartment of Petroleum Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic University of Riau, Jl. Kaharuddin Nasution No.113 Pekanbaru 28284, Indonesia ᶜCenter of Energy Studies (PSE), Islamic University of Riau, Pekanbaru 28284, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jurnalteknologi.v88.24172

Keywords:

Amine DEA, Absorption, CO2 Composition, Diethanolamine

Abstract

Efficient CO₂ removal from natural gas is essential for meeting pipeline specifications and minimizing corrosion risks. This study investigates the influence of temperature, pressure, and Diethanolamine (DEA) concentration on CO₂ absorption efficiency in the gas sweetening process, using simulations conducted with Aspen HYSYS V.10. Through a comprehensive sensitivity analysis, we explore the interaction between these parameters, revealing that temperature is a primary driver in optimizing DEA’s CO₂ capture capability. Results indicate that elevated temperatures (60–80°C) significantly enhance CO₂ absorption, stabilize performance, and reduce CO₂ composition to near-zero levels, especially at DEA concentrations between 0.4–0.6 mol/mol. While pressure contributes to absorption efficiency, its impact is most pronounced at lower temperatures and diminishes as temperature increases. A critical concentration threshold of 0.4–0.5 mol/mol is identified, beyond which CO₂ removal efficiency markedly improves, particularly at 40°C and higher. The findings suggest that optimal conditions for industrial gas sweetening applications include a temperature of 60–80°C, a DEA concentration of 0.4–0.6 mol/mol, and adjusted pressures to maintain stability without excessive dependency. These conditions enable maximum CO₂ removal, ensure compliance with gas quality standards, enhance operational efficiency, and reduce energy consumption. This study provides actionable insights for the gas processing industry, offers a roadmap for optimizing CO₂ absorption processes through precise parameter control, and supports the development of more sustainable and cost-effective gas sweetening technologies, with implications for improved environmental compliance and enhanced profitability in gas treatment operations.

References

Syukur, H. M. 2015. Potensi Gas Alam di Indonesia. Forum Teknologi. 6(1): 64–73.

Novrianti, N. 2014. Penentuan Absolute Open Flow pada Akhir Periode Laju Alir Plateau Sumur Gas. Journal of Earth Energy Engineering. 3(1): 19–24. https://doi.org/10.22549/jeee.v3i1.937.

International Energy Agency (IEA). 2024. Gas Market Report. Paris: IEA. Accessed 2024. https://www.iea.org/reports/gas-market-report-q3-2024.

Adi, A. C. 2024. Jumlah Cadangan Besar, Gas Bumi Jadi Energi Alternatif Utama Tuju Transisi Energi. Kementerian ESDM RI. Accessed 2024.

Melani, Agustina. 2024. Energi Mega Temukan Kandungan Gas Baru dari Blok KKS Bentu. Liputan6. Accessed 2024.

Sembiring, S., R. L. Panjaitan, Susianto, and A. Altway. 2019. Pemanfaatan Gas Alam sebagai LPG (Liquefied Petroleum Gas). Jurnal Teknik ITS. 8(2): 206–211.

Aulia, H. N. 2022. Simulasi Aspen Hysys pada Kolom Absorbsi Gas CO₂ dengan Solven Metildietanolamine (MDEA). Jurnal Teknologi Technoscientia. 14(2): 85–90.

Lyons, William C., and Gary J. Plisga. 2005. Standard Handbook of Petroleum & Natural Gas Engineering. 2nd ed. Burlington, MA: Elsevier.

Fatimura, M., R. Fitriyanti, and R. Masriatini. 2018. Penanganan Gas Asam (Sour Gas) yang Terkandung dalam Gas Alam Menjadi Sweetening Gas. Jurnal Redoks. 3(2): 55–67.

Arnold, K. 1999. Surface Production Operations. Vol. 2: Design of Gas Handling Systems and Facilities. Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing Company.

Tavan, Y., and A. Tavan. 2014. Performance of Conventional Gas Sweetening Process to Remove CO₂ in Presence of Azeotrope. Journal of CO₂ Utilization. 5: 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2013.12.001.

Abdel-Aal, H. K., Mohamed Aggour, and M. A. Fahim. 2003. Petroleum and Gas Field Processing. New York: Marcel Dekker.

Devold, H. 2013. Oil and Gas Production Handbook: An Introduction to Oil and Gas Production, Transport, Refining and Petrochemical Industry. Oslo: ABB AS Oil & Gas.

Ningsih, E., L. Pudjiastuti, D. Wulansari, N. Anggraheny, A. Altway, and K. K. Budhikarjono. 2012. Simulasi Absorpsi Multikomponen Gas dalam Larutan K₂CO₃ dengan Promoter MDEA pada Packed Column. Jurnal Teknik Kimia Indonesia. 11(1): 17–25.

Megawati, E. 2020. Analisa Pengaruh dan Hubungan Temperatur Amine, Tekanan Feed Gas dan Laju Alir Feed Gas terhadap Penyerapan CO₂ pada Unit 1C-2 Absorber (Studi Kasus PT XYZ). Al-Kimiya. 7(2): 82–87.

Paramita, N. S., D. F. Putra, and M. Z. Jaafar. 2024. Evaluated Several Scenarios of Different Temperatures and Pressures on the Purification of Natural Gas Using Silica Gel through Simulation. AIP Conference Proceedings. 3041(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0194855.

Sharifi, A., and E. O. Amiri. 2018. Effect of the Tower Type on the Gas Sweetening Process. Oil & Gas Science and Technology – Revue d’IFP Energies Nouvelles. 72(4): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2017018.

Rao, A. B., and E. S. Rubin. 2002. A Technical, Economic, and Environmental Assessment of Amine-Based CO₂ Capture Technology for Power Plant Greenhouse Gas Control. Environmental Science & Technology. 36(20): 4467–4475. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0158861.

Dooley, J. S., A. S. F. Lok, A. K. Burroughs, and E. J. Heathcote. 2004. Engineering Data Book. 12th ed. Tulsa, OK: Gas Processors Association.

Ciptorini, M. H. I., K. Arsi, and A. Altway. 2015. Studi Kinetika Absorpsi Karbon Dioksida Menggunakan Larutan Diethanolamine (DEA) Berpromotor Glycine. Surabaya: Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember.

Kim, Young Eun, H. W. Ryu, and J. B. Lee. 2013. Comparison of Carbon Dioxide Absorption in Aqueous MEA, DEA, TEA, and AMP Solutions. Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society. 34(3): 783–789. https://doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2013.34.3.783.

Kidnay, A. J., and W. R. Parrish. 2006. Fundamentals of Natural Gas Processing. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Hartanto, Y., A. Putranto, and S. Chintya. 2017. Simulasi Absorpsi Gas CO₂ dengan Pelarut Dietanolamina (DEA) Menggunakan Simulator Aspen Hysys. Jurnal Integrasi Proses. 6(3): 100–103.

Yu, C. H., C. H. Huang, and C. S. Tan. 2012. A Review of CO₂ Capture by Absorption and Adsorption. Aerosol and Air Quality Research. 12(5): 745–769. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2012.05.0132.

Aspen Technology, Inc. 2005. Aspen Hysys Tutorial & Applications: Operation Guide.

Zavira, L. F., D. B. Narariyadi, and M. R. Musadi. 2022. Simulasi Penangkapan Gas CO₂ dengan Pelarut Monoethanolamine Menggunakan Simulator Aspen Hysys V.11. Diseminasi FTI. 1–6.

Muhammad, A., and Y. Gadelhak. 2014. Correlating the Additional Amine Sweetening Cost to Acid Gases Load in Natural Gas Using Aspen Hysys. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering. 17: 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2014.01.008.

Aspen Technology, Inc. 2016. Aspen HYSYS® V10 Documentation and User Guide.

Aroonwilas, A., and A. Veawab. 2004. Characterization and Comparison of the CO₂ Absorption Performance into Single and Blended Alkanolamines in a Packed Column. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 43(9): 2228–2237. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie034209h.

Kim, Y. E., H. W. Ryu, and J. B. Lee. 2013. Comparison of Carbon Dioxide Absorption in Aqueous MEA, DEA, TEA, and AMP Solutions. Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society. 34(3): 783–789. https://doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2013.34.3.783.

Chakma, A., and A. Meisen. 1997. Thermal Degradation of Aqueous Diethanolamine Solutions. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering. 75(6): 861–869. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.5450750616.

Azizi, M., H. A. Ebrahim, and A. Baghban. 2021. Experimental and Modeling Study of CO₂ Capture by DEA Solutions at Various Temperatures and Concentrations. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. 9(5): 105959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.105959.

Zhang, L., Y. Yang, S. Li, and Y. Zhao. 2022. Effect of Temperature and Amine Concentration on CO₂ Absorption Performance in DEA-Based Systems: Experimental Insights. Chemical Engineering and Processing – Process Intensification. 178: 109014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2022.109014.

Mahmoud, M., M. Al-Marzouqi, and S. Al-Muhtaseb. 2020. Investigation of Operating Parameters for CO₂ Absorption Using Aqueous DEA Solutions: A Pilot-Scale Study. Energy Reports. 6: 2245–2254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2020.08.003.

Wang, C., Y. Liu, and K. Li. 2023. Impact of Temperature and Pressure on the Performance of Alkanolamine-Based CO₂ Absorbers. Separation and Purification Technology. 313: 123522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2023.123522.

Saleh, F., and M. M. F. Hasan. 2021. Thermodynamic and Kinetic Analysis of CO₂ Absorption Using Chemical Solvents. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 143: 110932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110932.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering