MANUFACTURING AND ANALYSIS OF PROSTHETIC FOOT USING COMPOSITE MATERIAL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/jurnalteknologi.v88.24886Keywords:
Mechanical properties, Foot, Prosthetic limb, Numerical analysisAbstract
The design and development of prosthetic feet play a crucial role in enhancing mobility, comfort, and overall quality of life for amputees, as an effective prosthetic must support body weight, enable a natural gait, and absorb shock during walking. However, conventional designs such as the SACH foot often lack sufficient flexibility, durability, and responsiveness for dynamic activities, while high-performance alternatives like carbon fiber-based models remain costly, creating a need for a lightweight, cost-effective solution with improved performance. This study addresses this gap by designing, manufacturing, and evaluating a composite prosthetic foot using carbon fiber, fiberglass, and Kevlar to optimize strength, durability, and affordability. The prosthetic was divided into a Keel and Heel, fabricated using layered composites (11 carbon fiber layers with additional reinforcement, 2 fiberglass layers, and 2 Kevlar layers), with a 15° dorsiflexion angle to simulate natural gait, and analyzed using ANSYS 14.5 for deformation, stress distribution, and safety factor, alongside mechanical testing. The developed prosthetic foot weighed 412 g and demonstrated effective gait simulation for below-knee and through-knee amputees, with tensile properties reaching yield strengths of 138.057 MPa and 102.486 MPa, ultimate strengths of 174.2 MPa and 146.257 MPa, and elastic moduli of 2.384 GPa and 5.616 GPa for two sample groups. The design maintained structural safety under normal loading with safety factors above 0.86 but became unsafe beyond 96 kg body weight, with reduced lifespan above 86 kg.
References
Lynch, L., M. McCarron, P. McCallion, and E. Burke. 2022. Sedentary Behaviour Levels in Adults with an Intellectual Disability: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. HRB Open Research. 4: 69. https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13326.3.
Windrich, M., M. Grimmer, O. Christ, S. Rinderknecht, and P. Beckerle. 2016. Active Lower Limb Prosthetics: A Systematic Review of Design Issues and Solutions. Biomedical Engineering Online. 15: 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-016-0284-9.
Awad, M. I., A. Abouhossein, A. A. Dehghani-Sanij, R. Richardson, D. Moser, S. Zahedi, and D. Bradley. 2016. Towards a Smart Semi-Active Prosthetic Leg: Preliminary Assessment and Testing. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 49(21): 170–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.10.539.
Humadi, R. Q., S. M. Abbas, and M. Q. Ibraheem. 2025. Calf-Corset Patella Tendon Weightbearing Orthosis Modeling and Manufacturing. Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal. 19(2): 418–428. https://doi.org/10.12913/22998624/196962.
Pirouzi, G., N. A. Abu Osman, A. Eshraghi, S. Ali, H. Gholizadeh, and W. A. B. Wan Abas. 2014. Review of the Socket Design and Interface Pressure Measurement for Transtibial Prosthesis. Scientific World Journal. 2014: 849073. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/849073.
Abbas, S. M., G. S. Sadiq, and M. Abdul Sattar. 2020. Improving the Composite Materials for Bilateral Prosthesis with Below Knee Amputation. In Materials Science Forum, 1002: 379–388. Trans Tech Publications. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.1002.379.
Abbas, S. M. 2020. Fatigue Characteristics and Numerical Modeling Socket for Patient with Above Knee Prosthesis. In Defect and Diffusion Forum. 398: 76–82. Trans Tech Publications. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/DDF.398.76.
Rapp, S. H., N. Pathak, A. Yellapragada, S. Gayakwad, M. Gupta, and K. Musunuru. 2019. Current Trends and Challenges in Prosthetic Product Development: Literature Review. International Journal of Scientific Research (IJSR). https://doi.org/10.21275/art20198727.
Abbas, S. M., J. S. Chiad, and A. M. Takhakh. 2025. Mechanical Properties and Numerical Modelling for Prosthetic Foot. Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Development. 29(1): 79–88. https://doi.org/10.31272/jaesd.2112.
Ibraheem, M., and A. Hussein. 2024. Gait Cycle Evaluation for Transfemoral Amputation. International Review of Automatic Control. 17: 76–83. https://doi.org/10.15866/ireaco.v17i2.24852.
Alduroobi, A. A., M. Q. Ibraheem, and N. H. Obaeed. 2018. Predict the Best Variants of Cutting in Turning Process Using Genetic Algorithm Technique. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference for Engineering, Technology and Sciences of Al-Kitab (ICETS). 33–38. IEEE.
Ridha, H. D., S. M. Abbas, G. S. Sadiq, and M. Q. Ibraheem. 2025. Mechanical Performance and Fatigue Analysis of Transfemoral Prosthetic Socket. Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal. 19(4): 378–386. https://doi.org/10.12913/22998624/200398.
Sadiq, G. Sh., H. Y. Khalaf, and S. M. Abbas. 2020. Manufacturing, Modeling and Analysis of Ankle Disarticulation Prosthetic for Transmalleolar Amputation. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 870: 012165. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/870/1/012165.
Ismail, M. R., Y. Y. Kahtan, and S. M. Abbas. 2020. A Modified Shank for Below Knee Prosthesis. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 671: 012061. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/671/1/012061.
Zaier, Z. H., and K. K. Resan. 2022. Effect of the Gait Speed on a New Prosthetic Shank Below Knee. Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Development. 26(4): 63–69. https://doi.org/10.31272/jeasd.26.4.7.
Resan, K. K., Y. K. Ibrahim, and S. H. Chaloob. 2015. Stress Relaxation on Prosthetic Laminated Socket Materials. Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Development. 19(3): 110–124.
Pradhan, S., and R. K. Mohanty. 2024. Comparison of Balance and Gait Pattern of Unilateral Transtibial Amputees Using Ranger and Dynamic Response Prosthetic Foot. World Scientific Annual Review of Biomechanics. 2430001. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2810958924300014.
Ibraheem, M. Q., N. H. Obaeed, and H. H. Abdulridha. 2024. Optimizing the MRR in WEDM Process by Using Taguchi Analysis and GA Technique. In AIP Conference Proceedings. 3002. AIP Publishing.
Wale, M. E., D. Q. Nesbitt, B. S. Henderson, C. K. Fitzpatrick, J. J. Creechley, and T. J. Lujan. 2021. Applying ASTM Standards to Tensile Tests of Musculoskeletal Soft Tissue: Methods to Reduce Grip Failures and Promote Reproducibility. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. 143(1): 011011. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4048646.
Sattar, M. A., A. Ghazwan, and S. M. Abbas. 2023. Study and Analysis of the Mechanical Properties and Pressure Socket for Through-Knee Amputation. International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration. 10(105): 1063. https://doi.org/10.19101/IJATEE.2023.10101334.
ASTM. 2000. Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties. ASTM International.
Ibraheem, M. Q., A. M. Saleh, and F. T. Al-Maliky. 2024. 3D Printing with FEA for the Design and Analysis of a Prototype of Prosthetic Hand (Case Study). International Review of Automatic Control. 17(5): 185–191. https://doi.org/10.15866/ireaco.v17i5.25261.
Test Resources. 2021. Composites Flexural Bend Testing Equipment.
Ibraheem, M., and A. Ali. 2024. Genetic Algorithm with Lyapunov Stability for Control of Prosthetic Knee Joint. International Review of Automatic Control. 17(1): 31–38. https://doi.org/10.15866/ireaco.v17i1.24533.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright of articles that appear in Jurnal Teknologi belongs exclusively to Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Penerbit UTM Press). This copyright covers the rights to reproduce the article, including reprints, electronic reproductions, or any other reproductions of similar nature.













