Effects of Hydrogen Addition on the Entropy Generation of Biogas Conventional Combustion

Authors

  • Seyed Ehsan Hosseini High-Speed Reacting Flow Laboratory, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Ghobad Bagheri High-Speed Reacting Flow Laboratory, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Mazlan A. Wahid High-Speed Reacting Flow Laboratory, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v66.2492

Keywords:

Entropy, biogas, hydrogen, flame

Abstract

Biogas has a great potential to be applied for heat and power generation throughout the world due to its availability from various resources. However, one of the most important barriers of biogas utilization development is its low calorific value. In order to increase the performance of biogas in industrial application, hydrogen enriched biogas could be substituted. In this paper a set of numerical simulations were conducted to estimate the variation of entropy generation in hydrogen enriched biogas flames due to hydrogen addition to the fuel. Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes with a second order turbulence closure and laminar flamelet combustion model was applied to compute energy fields and flow in the flame. It was found that hydrogen enrichment resulted in an augmentation in the entropy generation rate of the biogas conventional flame. Such increase could be attributed to the increase in irreversibilities due to biogas flame temperature rise.

References

Hosseini, S. E., Andwari, A. M., Wahid, M. A., &Bagheri, G. 2013. A Review on Green Energy Potentials in Iran. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 27: 533–545.

Hosseini, Seyed Ehsan, Mazlan Abdul Wahid, Saber Salehirad, and Mohsin M. Seis. 2013. Evaluation of Palm Oil Combustion Characteristics by Using the Chemical Equilibrium with Application (CEA) Software. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 388: 268–272.

Hosseini, Seyed Ehsan, and Mazlan Abdul Wahid. 2012. Necessity of Biodiesel Utilization as a Source of Renewable Energy in Malaysia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 16(8): 5732–5740.

Hosseini, Seyed Ehsan, Mazlan A. Wahid, and Abuelnuor Abdeen Ali Abuelnuor. 2013. Biogas Flameless Combustion: A Review. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 388: 273–279.

Hosseini, Seyed Ehsan, Mazlan Abdul Wahid, and NasimAghili. "The scenario of greenhouse gases reduction in Malaysia." Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 28 (2013): 400-409.

Hosseini, Seyed Ehsan, and Mazlan Abdul Wahid. 2013. Biogas Utilization: Experimental Investigation on Biogas Flameless Combustion in Lab-scale Furnace. Energy Conversion and Management 74: 426–432.

Hosseini, Seyed Ehsan, and Mazlan Abdul Wahid. 2013. Feasibility Study of Biogas Production and Utilization as a Source of Renewable Energy in Malaysia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 19: 454–462.

Jahangirian, Saeed, Engeda, Abraham, Wichman, Indrek S. 2009. Thermal and Chemical Structure of Biogas Counterflow Diffusion Flames. Energy Fuels. 23(11): 5312–21.

Taleghani G, Shabani Kia A. 2005. Technical–economical Analysis of the Saveh Biogaspower Plant. Renewable Energy. 30(3): 441–6.

Rasi S, Läntelä J, Rintala J. Trace. 2011. Compounds Affecting Biogas Energy Utilization A Review. Energy Conversion and Management. 52(12): 3369–75.

Lastella G, Testa C, Cornacchia G, Notornicola M, Voltasio F, Sharma Vinod Kumar. 2002. Anaerobic Digestion of Semi-solid Organic Waste: Biogas Production and Its Purification. Energy Conversion and Management. 43(1): 63–75.

Machado, Sandro L, Carvalho Miriam F, Gourc Jean-Pierre, VilarOrencio M, do Nascimento Julio CF. Methane Generation in Tropical Landfills: Simplified Methods and Field Results. Waste Manage. 29(1): 153–61.

DongkunLuo, Youjin Dai. 2009. Economic Evaluation of Coal Bed Methane Productionin China. Energy Policy. 37(10): 3883–9.

FatihDemirbas M, Balat Mustafa, BalatHavva. 2011. Biowastes-to-biofuels. Energy Conversion and Management. 52(4): 1815–28.

Demirbas Ayhan. 2011. Waste Management, Waste Resource Facilities and Waste Conversion Processes. Energy Conversion and Management. 52(2): 1280–7.

Albert Guisasola, Sharma Keshab R, Keller Jurg, Yuan Zhiguo. 2009. Development of Amodel for Assessing Methane Formation in Rising Main Sewers. Water Res. 43(11): 2874–84.

CigdemYangin-Gomec, OzturkIzzet. 2013. Effect of Maize Silage Addition on Biomethane Recovery from Mesophilic Co-digestion of Chicken and Cattle Manure to Suppress Ammonia Inhibition. Energy Conversion and Management. 71: 92–100.

Yang Shang-Shyng, Liu Chung-Ming, Lai Chao-Ming, Liu Yen-Lan. 2003. Estimation of Methane and Nitrous Oxide Emission from Paddy Fields and Uplands During 1990–2000 in Taiwan. Chemosphere. 52(8): 1295–305.

Nusbaum, Neil J. 2010. Dairy Livestock Methane Remediation and Global Warming. J Commun Health. 35(5): 500–2.

Astals S, Ariso M, Galí A, Mata-Alvarez J. 2011. Co-digestion of Pig Manure and Glycerine: Experimental and Modelling Study. Journal of Environmental Management. 92(4): 1091–6.

Takahashi J. 2011. Some Prophylactic Options to Mitigate Methane Emission Fromanimal Agriculture in Japan. Asian–Aust J AnimSci. 24: 285–94.

Balat M, Balat H. 2009. Biogas as a Renewable Energy Source—A Review. Energy Sources, Part A. 31(14): 1280–93.

W. Peschka. 1992. Liquid Hydrogen: Fuel of the Future. Springer-Verlag, Wien and NewYork.

A. A. Burbano HJ, J. M. Garcıa. 2008. Effects of Hydrogen Addition to Methane on the Flame Structure and CO Emissions in Atmospheric Burners. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 33: 3410–3415.

S. A. 1997. Guidelines for Hydrogen System Design, Materials Selection, Operations, Storage, and Transportation, Safety Standard for Hydrogen and Hydrogen Systems.

W. P. a. Jones, J. H. 1982. Calculations Method for Reacting Turbulent Flows: A Review. Combustion and Flame. 48: 1–26.

M. Ilbas, I. Yilmaz, Y. Kaplan. 2005. Investigations of Hydrogen and Hydrogen–Hydrocarbon Composite Fuel Combustion and NO Emission Characteristics in a Model Combustor. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 30(10): 1139–1147.

S. T. Amir Mardani. 2010. Effect of Hydrogen on Hydrogen–Methane Turbulent Nonpremixed Flame Under MILD Condition. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 35: 11324–11331.

W. M. M. Hossain. 2007. A Combustion Model Sensitivity Study for CH4/H2 Bluff-bodystabilized Flame. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science. 221: 1377.

M. H. M. Ravikanti, W. Malalasekera. 2009. Laminar flamelet Model Prediction of NO Formation in a Turbulent Bluff-body Combustor. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part A: Journal of Power and Energy. 223: 241.

D. Yilmas, S. U. 2005. Onbasioglu, Computational Modeling of Hydrogen Enriched Nonpremixed Turbulent Methane Air Flames. Proceedings of European Combustion Meeting.

P.s. Alessio Frassoldati, Alberto Cuoci, Tiziano Faravelli, Eliseo Ranzi. 2010. Kinetic and Fluid Dynamic Modeling of Methane/Hydrogen Jet Flames in Diluted Coflow. Applied Thermal Engineering. 30: 376–383.

D. M. Wicksall, A. K. Agrawal. 2007. Acoustics Measurements in a Lean Premixed Combustor Operated on Hydrogen/Hydrocarbon Fuel Mixtures. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 32(8): 1103–1112.

O. Tuncer, S. Acharya, U. H. Jong. 2006. Effects of Hydrogen Enrichment on Confined Methane Flame Behavior. In: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Power Division (Publication) PWR,Atlanta, GA, 2006.

S. Vijaykant, A. K. Agrawal, 2005. Numerical Investigation of Swirl Stabilized Combustion of Lean Premixed Methane and Hydrogen Enriched Methane. In: 43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit - Meeting Papers, Reno, NV, 2005. 11577–11585.

F. Cozzi, A. Coghe. 2006. Behavior of Hydrogen-enriched Non-premixed Swirled Natural Gas Flames. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 31(6): 669–677.

S. Chen, Z. Liu, J. Liu, J. Li, L. Wang, C. Zheng. 2010. Analysis of Entropy Generation in Hydrogen Enriched Ultra-lean Counter-flow Methane-air Non-premixed Combustion. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 35(22): 12491–12501.

B. S. Yilbas, S. Z. Shuja, M. O. Budair. 1999. Second Law Analysis of A Swirling Flow in a Circular Duct with Restriction. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 42(21): 4027–4041.

W. W. L. T.-H. Shih, A. Shabbir, Z. Yang, J. Zhu. 1995. A New K-epsilon Eddy Viscosity Model for High Reynolds Number Turbulent Flows—Model Development and Validation. Computers Fluids. 24(3): 227–238.

G. P. Smith, D. M. Golden, M. Frenklach, N. W. Moriarty, B. Eiteneer, M. Goldenberg, C.T.

Bowman, R. K. Hanson, S. Song, W. C. Gardiner, V. V. L. Jr., Z. Qin, GRI-Mech 3.0, The Gas Research Institute : http://www.me.berkeley.edu/gri_mech.

Fluent, Ansys, 14.0 Theory Guide, AnsysInc 5. 2012.

Som, S. K., and A. Datta. 2008. Thermodynamic Irreversibilities and Exergy Balance in Combustion Processes. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science. 34(3): 351–376.

Downloads

Published

2014-01-01

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

Effects of Hydrogen Addition on the Entropy Generation of Biogas Conventional Combustion. (2014). Jurnal Teknologi, 66(2). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v66.2492