IMPLEMENTATION OF POROUS PILE CONE BREAKWATER FOR PROTECTING SHORELINE AND PRESERVING MARINE BIODIVERSITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/jurnalteknologi.v88.25187Keywords:
Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), marine biota, numerical models, porous pile cone breakwaters, wave velocityAbstract
In the last decade, marine structures have impacted biodiversity loss and ecosystem degradation. As a mitigation effort, artificial coral reef structures have been designed to dissipate wave energy through turbulence, creating microhabitats that attract marine organisms to interact and thrive. A biomimetic design adopted from coral reefs, called porous pile cone breakwater (PPCB), has been introduced, combining a porous pile with a conical pile head (CPH). Breakwater piles and CPHs have proven effective in protecting shorelines and maintaining water quality for marine life. The CPH design reduces wave energy and velocity, enhancing the abundance of marine life. This study investigated wave velocity (Vx) characteristics around PPCBs using the mesoscopic Lattice Boltzmann Method (LBM) within a CFD application. Three-dimensional fluid motion was modeled for Series-1 (emerged type) and Series-2 (submerged type) with porosity p=0.4, wave steepness 0.058–0.068 in a 30m wide numerical basin. Both configurations reduced Vx in the structure area by over 90%, with the submerged PPCB achieving up to 11.3% greater reduction and maintaining 80–88% lower Vx behind the structure. These findings indicate the submerged PPCB offers superior shoreline protection, while both designs maintain maximum velocity and Froude Number values suitable for sustaining coastal ecosystems.
References
Haryani, Irianto, A., and N. Syah. 2019. Study of Coastal Abrasion Disasters and Their Causes in Pariaman City. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 314 (012009): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/314/1/012009.
Ishak, M. 2023. Abrasion Disaster Profile, Impact and Abrasion Mitigation Efforts in East Java Province. Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi. 4(12): 2324–2332. https://doi.org/10.59141/jist.v4i12.835.
Palisu, B. J., M. R. Fiqri, and F. M. Assidiq. 2022. Investigasi Bencana Abrasi di Berbagai Wilayah Masyarakat Pesisir di Indonesia. Riset Sains dan Teknologi Kelautan. 5(2): 148–152. https://doi.org/10.62012/sensistek.v5i2.24264.
Cooke, Steven J., Diana M. P. Galassi, Bronwyn M. Gillanders, Steven J. Landsman, Neil Hammerschlag, Austin J. Gallagher, Erika J. Eliason, Christopher E. Kraft, Michael K. Taylor, Charles M. Crisafulli, Dan H. Shugar, and Robert J. Lennox. 2023. Consequences of ‘Natural’ Disasters on Aquatic Life and Habitats. Environmental Reviews. 31(1): 122–140. https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2022-0050.
Anton, I. A., M. Panaitescu, F. V. Panaitescu, and S. Ghiţă. 2019. Impact of Coastal Protection Systems on Marine Ecosystems. E3S Web of Conferences. 85(07011): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20198507011.
Suedel, Burton C., J. Calabria, M. V. Bilskie, J. E. Byers, K. Broich, S. K. McKay, A. S. Tritinger, C. B. Woodson, and E. Dolatowski. 2022. Engineering Coastal Structures to Centrally Embrace Biodiversity. Journal of Environmental Management. 323: 116138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116138.
Van De Riet, K. 2019. Biomimicry of Mangroves Teaches How to Improve Coastal Barriers. ANSYS Blog. Accessed online. https://www.ansys.com/blog/biomimicry-mangroves-improve-coastal-erosion-coastal-barriers.
Kazemi, A., K. Van de Riet, and O. M. Curet. 2017. Hydrodynamics of Mangrove-Type Root Models: The Effect of Porosity, Spacing Ratio and Flexibility. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics. 12: 056003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/aa7ccf.
Kazemi, A., H. B. Evans, K. Van de Riet, L. Castillo, and O. M. Curet. 2018. Hydrodynamics of Mangrove Roots and Its Applications in Coastal Protection. In OCEANS 2018 MTS/IEEE Charleston. 1–8. Charleston, SC, USA, October 22–25, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANS.2018.8604931.
White, Alan T., Chua L. Ming, M. W. R. N. De Silva, and F. Y. Guarin. 1990. Artificial Reefs for Marine Habitat Enhancement in Southeast Asia. Manila, Philippines: International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management.
Perricone, V., M. Mutalipassi, A. Mele, M. Buono, D. Vicinanza, and P. Contestabile. 2023. Nature-Based and Bioinspired Solutions for Coastal Protection: An Overview among Key Ecosystems and a Promising Pathway for New Functional and Sustainable Designs. ICES Journal of Marine Science. 80(5): 1218–1239. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsad080.
Van Hespen, R., C. E. J. Van Bijsterveldt, C. M. L. Camargo, M. M. Stoorvogel, and T. J. Bouma. 2023. How Can Nature Protect People against Sea-Level Rise? Frontiers for Young Minds. 11: 910803. https://doi.org/10.3389/frym.2023.910803.
Harris, L. E. 2009. Artificial Reefs for Ecosystem Restoration and Coastal Erosion Protection with Aquaculture and Recreational Amenities. Reef Journal. 1(1): 235–246.
Nakamura, M. 1985. Evolution of Artificial Fishing Reef Concepts in Japan. Bulletin of Marine Science. 37(1): 271–278.
Desa, S. M., O. A. Karim, and A. Mohamed. 2016. Submerged Breakwater Hydrodynamic Modeling for Wave Dissipation and Coral Restorer Structure. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Biomedical and Bioinformatics Engineering (ICBBE 2016). 98–101. New York: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3022702.3022726.
Rashidi, A. H. M., M. H. Jamal, M. Z. Hassan, S. S. M. Sendek, S. L. M. Sopie, and M. R. A. Hamid. 2021. Coastal Structures as Beach Erosion Control and Sea Level Rise Adaptation in Malaysia: A Review. Water. 13(1741): 1–34. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13131741.
Armono, H. D., A. Winarto, Sujantoko, and I. K. Suastika. 2021. A Laboratory Study on Wave Transmission over Hexagonal Artificial Reef. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 799(012011): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/799/1/012011.
Armono, H. D., K. R. Hall, and A. S. J. Swamidas. 2001. Wave Field Around Hemispherical Shape Artificial Reefs Used for Fish Habitat. In Proceedings of the Canadian Coastal Conference 2001. Canadian Coastal Science and Engineering Association.
Zhao, X. L., D. Z. Ning, Q. P. Zou, D. S. Qiao, and S. Q. Cai. 2019. Hybrid Floating Breakwater–WEC System: A Review. Ocean Engineering. 186: 106126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106126.
Koraim, A. S., E. M. Heikal, and A. A. Abo Zaid. 2014. Hydrodynamic Characteristics of Porous Seawall Protected by Submerged Breakwater. Applied Ocean Research. 46: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2014.01.003.
Saengsupavanich, C., E. H. Ariffin, L. S. Yun, and D. A. Pereira. 2022. Environmental Impact of Submerged and Emerged Breakwaters. Heliyon. 8(12): e12626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12626.
Rao, S. S., N. B. S. Rao, and V. S. Sathyanarayana. 1999. Laboratory Investigation on Wave Transmission through Two Rows of Perforated Hollow Piles. Ocean Engineering. 26(7): 675–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-8018(98)00021-3.
Sathyanarayana, A. H., P. S. Suvarna, P. Umesh, and K. G. Shirlal. 2021. Performance Characteristics of a Conical Pile Head Breakwater: An Experimental Study. Ocean Engineering. 235: 109395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109395.
Saputra, A., D. Permana, F. D. Cahyo, Arif, and E. A. Wijonarko. 2021. Coral Reef Transplantation Acropora spp. for Coral Reef Rehabilitation on Panjang Island, Teluk Banten. Jurnal Kelautan dan Perikanan Terapan. 4(2): 105–115. https://doi.org/10.15578/jkpt.v4i2.10074.
Anonim. 2023. XFlow 2022 User Guide. https://www.technia.com/software/simulia/xflow-cfd/.
Altoyan, W., and J. J. Alonso. 2023. Accelerating the Lattice Boltzmann Method. In 2023 IEEE Aerospace Conference. https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO55745.2023.10115537.
Sheikholeslami, M., and E. Abohamzeh. 2022. Lattice Boltzmann Method. In Advanced Computational Techniques for Heat and Mass Transfer in Food Processing. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003159520-6.
Bao, Y. B., and J. Meskas. 2011. Lattice Boltzmann Method for Fluid Simulations. Simon Fraser University.
Pereira, F. S., F. F. Grinstein, D. M. Israel, and L. Eça. 2022. Verification and Validation: The Path to Predictive Scale-Resolving Simulations of Turbulence. Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification. 7(2): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4053884.
Fauzi, M., E. Fatimah, and Q. Aini. 2025. Biomimicry Approach in the Design of Coastal Protection Structures. In Inclusive and Integrated Disaster Risk Reduction, edited by A. Opdyke and L. Pascua de Rivera. Springer Proceedings in Earth and Environmental Sciences. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-81072-5_26.
Sathyanarayana, A. H., P. S. Suvarna, P. Umesh, K. G. Shirlal, H. Bihs, and A. Kamath. 2022. Numerical Modelling of an Innovative Conical Pile Head Breakwater. Water. 14(24): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14244087.
Nurzaman, L., P. T. Juwono, V. Dermawan, and I. Wijatmiko. 2024. The Effectiveness of Inclined Pile Breakwater on the Transmission Coefficient. Civil Engineering Journal. 10(6): 1863–1873. https://doi.org/10.28991/CEJ-2024-010-06-09.
Sugianto, D. N., R. Widiaratih, S. Widada, Suripin, E. P. Handayani, and P. Cahyaningtyas. 2022. Analysis of Structural and Non-Structural Disaster Mitigation Due to Erosion in the Timbulsloko Village, Demak–Central Java. Journal of Ecological Engineering. 23(2): 246–254. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/144559
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright of articles that appear in Jurnal Teknologi belongs exclusively to Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Penerbit UTM Press). This copyright covers the rights to reproduce the article, including reprints, electronic reproductions, or any other reproductions of similar nature.













