INTEGRATING RVS AND DCR FOR A COMPREHENSIVE SEISMIC VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT OF EXISTING BUILDINGS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/jurnalteknologi.v88.25549Keywords:
Earthquake, Seismic vulnerability, Rapid Visual Screening, Demand Capacity Ratio, BuildingAbstract
Southeast Asia faces significant seismic risk, but many public buildings in developing countries still lack adequate vulnerability assessments to address earthquake hazards. This study evaluated the vulnerability of buildings by integrating the Rapid Visual Screening (RVS) and Demand Capacity Ratio (DCR) methods at five government-owned public buildings in Surakarta, Central Java. The RVS analysis showed that four of five buildings had scores < 2, indicating high earthquake vulnerability. Furthermore, the DCR assessment revealed inconsistencies in public parking buildings and health facilities with respect to the strong-column-weak-beam principle as stipulated in SNI 1726:2019. Key factors affecting vulnerability include building irregularities, soil types, and regulatory standards during the planning process. The integration of RVS and DCR provides a more comprehensive evaluation process by combining a quick visual inspection with an in-depth structural capacity analysis. This study offers a practical contribution by providing a tool for relevant authorities to identify and prioritize strengthening building structures to reduce the impact of future seismic disasters.
References
[1] R. J. Geller, “Earthquake prediction: a critical review,” Geophys. J. Int., Vol. 131, No. 3, pp. 425–450, 1997, DOI: https://10.1111/j.1365-246x.1997.tb06588.x.
[2] N. B. Jarah, A. H. Hassin Alasadi, and K. M. Hashim, “Earthquake prediction technique: a comparative study,” IAES Int. J. Artif. Intell., Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 1026–1032, 2023, DOI: https://10.11591/ijai.v12.i3.pp1026-1032.
[3] A. Ismail-Zadeh, “Earthquakes yes, disasters no,” npj Nat. Hazards, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2024, DOI: https://10.1038/s44304-024-00049-0.
[4] I. A. Frege et al., World Risk Report 2023. Berlin: worldRiskReport 2023, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://weltrisikobericht.de/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/WorldRiskReport_2023_english_online.pdf
[5] Verstappen, “Indonesian Landforms and Plate Tectonics,” J. Geol. Indones., Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 197–207, 2010, doi: https://doi.org/10.17014/ijog.v5i3.103.
[6] N. Haris, A. C. Furqan, A. Kahar, and F. Karim, “Disaster risk index on disaster management budgeting: Indonesia’s national data set,” Jamba J. Disaster Risk Stud., Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 1–7, 2023, DOI: 10.4102/jamba.v15i1.1365.
[7] S. D. Rahmawati, “Spatial Modeling of Earthquake Risk in Sulawesi and Maluku Based on Geological Factors,” Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 235–247, 2025, DOI: 10.20956/ejsa.v6i2.45160.
[8] A. R. Bramantya, Sugiharto, and L. Mulya, “Documenting disaster in Yogyakarta: A case study of earthquake on May 27th, 2006,” Rec. Libr. J., Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 247–260, 2024, DOI: 10.20473/rlj.V10-I2.2024.247-260.
[9] Maidiawati, J. Tanjung, Y. Sanada, F. Nugroho, and S. Wardi, “Seismic analysis of damaged buildings based on post-earthquake investigation of the 2018 Palu earthquake,” Int. J. GEOMATE, Vol. 18, No. 70, pp. 116–122, 2020, DOI: 10.21660/2020.70.9490.
[10] A. Fajar, N. Sarjan, and I. H. Muchtaranda, “Review of the 2018 Lombok Earthquake, Indonesia, and Its Impact from Previous Studies,” Proc. First Mandalika Int. Multi-Conference Sci. Eng. 2022, MIMSE 2022 (Civil Archit., pp. 76–84, 2023, DOI: 10.2991/978-94-6463-088-6.
[11] S. Pratiwi, “Determination of Earthquake Vulnerability Level Using the Microtremor Refraction (ReMi) Method in Surakarta City (Penentuan Tingkat Kerawanan Gempa Bumi Menggunakan Metode Refraksi Mikrotremor (ReMi) di Kota Surakarta),” Indones. J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 7, No. 1, p. 58, 2017, DOI: 10.13057/ijap.v7i1.4884.
[12] Y. M. Purwana M.T., R. H. Dananjaya, and Y. C. Nogroho, “Updating of Surakarta Seismic Site Class Map Based on Standard Penetration Test,” J. Ris. Rekayasa Sipil, Vol. 3, No. 2, p. 84, 2020, DOI: 10.20961/jrrs.v3i2.41085.
[13] Tim Detik Jogja, “A magnitude 5.2 earthquake shook the waters of Gunungkidul (Gempa M 5,2 Goyang Perairan Gunungkidul),” Yogyakarta, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.detik.com/jogja/berita/d-7758146/gempa-m-5-2-goyang-perairan-gunungkidul
[14] Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Jawa Tengah, “Population by Regency/City in Central Java, 2023 (Jumlah Penduduk Menurut Kabupaten/Kota di Jawa Tengah, 2023),” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://jateng.bps.go.id/id/statistics-table/2/NzY2IzI=/jumlah-penduduk-menurut-kabupaten-kota-di-jawa-tengah.html
[15] L. B. Grant, “Paleoseismology,” in International Handbook Of Earthquake and Engineering Seismology, California, 2002, pp. 475–489. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0074-6142(02)80233-9.
[16] P. Mahto and S. C. Gupta, “Tectonic stress regime and faulting style analysis due to sequence of earthquakes in Western Nepal,” Nat. Hazards Res., Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 531–538, 2024, DOI: 10.1016/j.nhres.2023.11.010.
[17] P. Bountzis, C. Kourouklas, P. Bonatis, V. Karakostas, E. Papadimitriou, and A. Kostoglou, “Triggering mechanisms and repeating earthquakes during the intense 2020-2021 seismic crisis in the Gulf of Corinth,” Geophys. J. Int., Vol. 242, No. 2, pp. 1–18, 2025, DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggaf181.
[18] M. Ujianto, A. Z. M. Ali, and M. Solikin, “Structural Behavior of Precast Concrete Wall Panels Due,” Vol. 050013, No. July, 2023.
[19] Z. Yilmaz et al., “Regional Building Damage Survey Data on the 2023 Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye, Earthquakes,” ASCE OPEN Multidiscip. J. Civ. Eng., Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 1–25, 2024, DOI: 10.1061/aomjah.aoeng-0041.
[20] S. Li, Y. Zhang, Z. Du, C. Zhai, and L. Xie, “Quantitative evaluation on building collapse-induced human casualty for performance-based earthquake engineering,” Sustain. Dev. Crit. Infrastruct. - Proc. 2014 Int. Conf. Sustain. Dev. Crit. Infrastruct., No. December, pp. 197–203, 2014, DOI: 10.1061/9780784413470.019.
[21] Siddharth and A. K. Sinha, “Rapid visual screening vulnerability assessment method of buildings: a review,” Int. J. Adv. Technol. Eng. Explor., Vol. 9, No. 88, pp. 326–336, 2022, DOI: 10.19101/IJATEE.2021.874605.
[22] V. N. Wankhade, “A Seismic Vulnerability and Fragility of RC Conventional and Monolithic Building,” Int. J. Res. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol., Vol. 10, No. 6, pp. 4732–4743, 2022, DOI: 10.22214/ijraset.2022.45042.
[23] FEMA 310, Handbook for the Seismic Evaluation of Buildings: A Prestandard. Washingtong D.C, 1998. [Online]. Available: https://mitigation.eeri.org/wp-content/uploads/fema310.pdf
[24] E. Juliafad and H. Gokon, “Seismic Fragility Function For Single Storey Masonry Wall Rc Building In Padang City , Indonesia,” Vol. 22, No. 94, pp. 39–46, 2022, DOI: https://doi.org/10.21660/2022.94.3160.
[25] A. Yeşilyurt, “Seismic vulnerability and risk assessment of a typical RC school building using hybrid-based fragility curves,” Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 796–811, 2025, DOI: https://doi.org/10.61112/jiens.1679569.
[26] FEMA-154, Rapid visual screening of buildings for potential seismic hazards: FEMA 154 and FEMA 155 updates, No. January. Washington D.C, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784479728.064.
[27] M. A. Rofiq, M. Tsabit, and R. Bachtiar, “High Quality Reinforced Due To Axial Loading (Bertulang Mutu Tinggi Akibat Beban Aksial),” Pros. Simp. Nas. Rekayasa Apl. Peranc. dan Ind., pp. 104–106, 2020.
[28] N. Hassan, S. R. Chowdhury, and R. I. Shuvo, “Seismic Behavior Of Multi-Storied RC Building With Re-Entrant Corner,” J. Teknol., Vol. 2, pp. 183–198, 2024, DOI: 10.11113/jurnalteknologi.v86.20656.
[29] N. Ramly, M. Alel, A. Adnan, and E. T. Mohamad, “A Simplified Method for Preliminary Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Existing Buildings in Kundasang, Sabah, Malaysia,” J. Teknol., Vol. 3, pp. 1–7, 2015, DOI: 10.11113/jt.v72.4003.
[30] R. S. Siregar, Z. Djauhari, and Ridwan, “The Effect of Site Class Classification According to SNI 1726-2019 on Progressive Collapse of Irregular Building Structures (Pengaruh Klasifikasi Kelas Situs Menurut SNI 1726-2019 Terhadap Keruntuhan Progresif pada Struktur Gedung Tidak Beraturan),” Sainstek (e-Journal), Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 123–131, 2021, DOI: 10.35583/js.v9i2.153.
[31] N. K. Handayani, “Evaluation of Structural Performance of Existing Building Seven-Story Building with FEMA 310 (Evaluasi Kinerja Struktur pada Gedung Eksisting Tujuh Lantai dengan FEMA 310),” J. Tek. Sipil dan Teknol. Konstr., Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 1–14, 2021, DOI: https://doi.org/10.62603/konteks.v2i1.241.
[32] FEMA 356, Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings - FEMA 356, No. November. Washington D.C, 2000. [Online]. Available: https://www.nehrp.gov/pdf/fema356.pdf
[33] J. H. Sohn, I. S. Choi, and J. H. Kim, “Seismic Performance Evaluation by Demand Capacity Ratio in Vertical Irregular Buildings,” in The 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 2020, No. September, pp. 1–12. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360104051_Seismic_performance_evaluation_by_demand_capacity_ratio_in_vertical_irregular_buildings
[34] Y. Nurchasanah, A. Rochman, M. Ujianto, A. S. Fauzi, and A. H. Nugraha, “Assessments of the Vulnerability and Demand Capacity Ratio of Old Public Buildings Structures,” E3S Web Conf., Vol. 517, p. 7, 2024, DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202451705009.
[35] A. Febrianto, Erizal, and H. Putra, “Seismic Analysis of Building Structures Using ASCE 41-17 and SNI 1726:2019 (Analisis Seismik Struktur Bangunan menggunakan ASCE 41- 17 dan SNI 1726 : 2019),” Tek. Sipil dan Lingkung., Vol. 09, No. 02, pp. 211–220, 2024, DOI: 10.29244/jsil.9.2.211-220.
[36] SNI 1726, “Code of Practice for Earthquake-Resistant Design of Building and Non-Building Structures (Tata cara perencanaan ketahanan gempa untuk struktur bangunan gedung dan nongedung),” Badan Standarisasi Nasional, Jakarta, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://ciptakarya.pu.go.id/admin/assets/upload/galeri/gempa/2025/05/21/201747_1. SNI_1726_2019_Tata cara perencanaan ketahanan gempa untuk struktur bangunan gedung dan non gedung.pdf
[37] F. A. Nugroho, Y. Nurchasanah, and M. G. Fauzi, “Evaluation of Building Structural Performance Using Design Earthquake Response Spectrum Analysis Based on SNI 1726:2019 (Evaluasi Kinerja Struktur Gedung Menggunakan Analisis Respons Spektrum Gempa Desain SNI 1726:2019),” in Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknik Sipil 2024, 2024, pp. 50–54. [Online]. Available: https://proceedings.ums.ac.id/sipil/article/view/3946/3597
[38] SNI 2847, “Requirements for Structural Concrete for Buildings (Persyaratan Beton Struktural untuk Bangunan Gedung),” Jakarta, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://tekonsipil.sv.ugm.ac.id/file/sni-2847-2019-persyaratan-beton-struktural-untuk-bangunan-gedung-sni-1726-2019-persyaratan-beton-struktural-untuk-bangunan-gedung/
[39] SNI 1729, “Specifications for Structural Steel Buildings (Spesifikasi untuk bangunan gedung baja struktural),” Jakarta, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://spada.uns.ac.id/pluginfile.php/650679/mod_resource/content/4/SNI 1729-2020 Spesifikasi untuk bangunan gedung baja struktural.pdf
[40] N. K. Handayani, B. M. Abadi, and N. D. Pamungkas, “Structural Performance Evaluation Of 7-Storey 1-Basement Hospital Building In Semarang By Linear Dynamic Analysis Of Variational Response And Time History Using The Reference Of Sni 1726:2019 (Evaluasi Kinerja Struktur Gedung Rumah Sakit 7 Lantai 1 Baseme,” J. Civ. Eng. Infrastruct. Technol., Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 39–48, 2024, DOI: 10.36728/jceit.v3i2.4347.
[41] SNI 1727, “Minimum design loads and related criteria for buildings and other structures (Beban desain minimum dan Kriteria terkait untuk bangunan gedung dan struktur lain),” Jakarta, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://ciptakarya.pu.go.id/admin/assets/upload/galeri/gempa/2025/05/21/380575_3. SNI_1727_2020_Beban desain minimum dan kriteria terkait untuk bangunan gedung dan struktur lain.pdf
[42] F. Sun and B. Xiao, “Analysis on interstory drift of high-rise residential quasi-megastructure,” Adv. Struct. Eng., pp. 1–14, 2019, DOI: 10.1177/1369433218822091.
[43] Y. C. Assidiq and I. Bali, “Study of Base Shear and Inter-Story Drift due to Earthquake Forces on a Ten-Story Building Structure in Surakarta,” Vol. 62, No. April, pp. 1–11, 2025, DOI: 10.33021/pcej.v3i1.5627.
[44] J.-W. Pang, C.-C. Yip, L. Ling, J. Y. Wong, F. S. Lam, and C. F. Wong, “Finite Element Simulation Of Low-Rise School Building Model With Seismic Loads Input,” J. Teknol., Vol. 6, pp. 141–152, 2024, DOI: 10.11113/jurnalteknologi.v86.22019|.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright of articles that appear in Jurnal Teknologi belongs exclusively to Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Penerbit UTM Press). This copyright covers the rights to reproduce the article, including reprints, electronic reproductions, or any other reproductions of similar nature.
