Benchmarking Technique in Lean Manufacturing (5s) Practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v59.2574Keywords:
low cost, high quality, lean manufacturing, benchmarking, market share, competitivenessAbstract
In today’s competitive market, low cost production and high quality product could assists manufacturers to win new and maintain their existing customers thus gain bigger market share. Manufacturing cost is one of the key dominant factors towards achieving business success. As such, manufacturing firms are struggling to produce product with lowest manufacturing cost while at the same time maintaining their product quality. Lean manufacturing practice could be applied to lower the manufacturing cost and benchmarking technique to ensure on the implementation effectiveness. A case study was conducted in a small and medium manufacturing firm located in China. One of the lean manufacturing tools, i.e. 5S system was implemented in the production line of the case study company. For future reference, the present situation was studied prior to the 5S system implementation. Later, the result of the study was benchmarked against before, after and the best in class manufacturer. A framework was developed to guide the user during implementing the 5S system. The benchmarking result shows significant improvement in productivity and lower manufacturing cost after implementing the 5S system. The implementation of 5S system had created more comfortable workspace to production workers, standard procedures and method to produce the product. Therefore, it can be concluded, the 5S system was able to help the production workers to implement the lean manufacturing and benchmarking technique more effectively to bring additional advantages in producing lower cost and high quality product, which eventually helps the company to gain better market share.References
Cudney, E. & Elrod, C. 2011. A Comparative Analysis of Integrating Lean Concepts Into Supply Chain Management in Manufacturing and Service Industries. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma. 2(1): 5–22.
Antony, J. 2011. Reflective Pratice Six Sigma Vs Lean–some Perspectives from Leading Academics & Practitioners. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. 60(2): 185–190.
Badurdeen, F., Wijekoon, K. & Marksberry, P. 2011. An Analytical Hierarchy Process-based Tool to Evaluate Value Systems for Lean Transformations. Journal of manufacturing Technology Management. 22(1): 46–65.
Bayo-Moriones, A., Bello-Pintado, A. & Merino-Diaz de Cerio, J. 2010. 5S Use in Manufacturing Plants: Contextual Factors and Impact on Operating Performance. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management. 27(2): 217–230.
Gapp, Rod., Fisher, R. & Kobayashi, K. 2008. Implementing 5S with Japanese Context: An Integrated Management System. Management Decision. 46(4): 565–579.
Anand, G. & Kodali, R. 2008. Benchmarking the Benchmarking Models. Benchmarking: An International Journal. 15(3): 257–291.
Ahmed, S. & Hassan, M. 2002. New Research: Survey and Case Investigations on Application of Quality Management Tools and Techniques in SMIs. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management. 20(7): 795–826.
Razmi, J., Zairi, M. & Jarrar, Y. F.. 2000. The Application of Graphical Techniques in Evaluating Benchmarking Partners. Benchmarking: An International Journal. 7(4): 304–314.
Summers, D. C. S. 2004. Quality. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright of articles that appear in Jurnal Teknologi belongs exclusively to Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Penerbit UTM Press). This copyright covers the rights to reproduce the article, including reprints, electronic reproductions, or any other reproductions of similar nature.