Prediction of Powder Injection Molding Process Parameters Using Artificial Neural Networks

Authors

  • Javad Rajabi Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Norhamidi Muhamad Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Maryam Rajabi Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia 43400, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Jamal Rajabi Faculty of Engineering, Gonbad Kavoos Branch, Islamic Azad University, Gonbad Kavoos, Iran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v59.2590

Keywords:

Artificial neural network, back propagation algorithm, powder injection molding, debinding, sintering

Abstract

The parameters of Powder Injection Molding (PIM) process were modeled by artificial neural networks (ANNs). The feed-forward multilayer perceptron was utilized and trained by back-propagation algorithm. Particle size, particle morphology, debinding time, and sintering temperature were taken into account and regarded as inputs of the ANN model. The outputs included relative density, wax loss, shrinkage, and hardness. The results obtained using the ANN model were in good agreement with the experimental data. In fact, they displayed an average R-value of 0.95 versus the experimental values. The optimum architecture of ANN was 7-4-1, in which the network was trained with Levenberg–Marquardt training algorithm. Thus, the ANN model can be used to evaluate, calculate, and forecast PIM process parameters.

References

Ye, H., Liu, X. Y. & Hong, H. 2008. Fabrication of Metal Matrix Composites by Metal Injection Molding—A Review. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 200(1–3): 12–24.

Abolhasani, H. & Muhamad, N. 2010. A New Starch-based Binder for Metal Injection Molding. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 210(6–7): 961–968.

Shen, C., Wang, L. & Li, Q. 2007. Optimizationof Injection Molding Process Parameters Using Combination of Artificial Neural Network and Genetic Algorithm Method. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 183(2–3): 412–418

Yarlagadda, P. K. D. V. 2002. Development of an Integrated Neural Network System for Prediction of Process Parameters in Metal Injection Moulding. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 130–131: 315–320.

Reddy, N., Lee, Y., Park, C. & Lee, C. 2008. Prediction of Flow Stress in Ti–6Al–4V Alloy with an Equiaxed Α+Β Microstructure by Artificial Neural Networks. Materials Science and Engineering: A 492(1–2): 276–282.

Özcan, F., Atiş, C. D., Karahan, O., Uncuoğlu, E. & Tanyildizi, H. 2009. Comparison of Artificial Neural Network and Fuzzy Logic Models for Prediction of Long-Term Compressive Strength of Silica Fume Concrete. Advances in Engineering Software. 40(9): 856–863.

Contreras, J. M., Jiménez-Morales, A. & Torralba, J. M. 2010. Experimental and Theoretical Methods for Optimal Solids Loading Calculation in MIM Feedstocks Fabricated from Powders with Different Particle Characteristics. Powder Metallurgy. 53(1): 34–40.

Contreras, J. M., Jiménez-Morales, A. & Torralba, J. M. 2009. Fabrication of Bronze Components by Metal Injection Moulding Using Powders with Different Particle Characteristics. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 209(15–16): 5618–5625.

Moreschi, V., Lalot, S., Courtois, C. & Leriche, A. 2009. Modelling the Tap Density of Inorganic Powders Using Neural Networks. Journal of the European Ceramic Society. 29(15): 3105–3111.

Mirzadeh, H. & Najafizadeh, A. 2009. Modeling The Reversion of Martensite in the Cold Worked AISI 304 Stainless Steel by Artificial Neural Networks. Materials & Design. 30(3): 570–573.

Downloads

Published

2012-10-15

How to Cite

Prediction of Powder Injection Molding Process Parameters Using Artificial Neural Networks. (2012). Jurnal Teknologi, 59(2). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v59.2590