Building Condition Assessment for New Houses: A Case Study in Terrace Houses

Authors

  • Adi Irfan Che Ani Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, University Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Norngainy Mohd Tawil Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, University Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Suhana Johar Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, University Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Mohd Zulhanif Abd Razak Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, University Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Hafsah Yahaya Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, University Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v70.2812

Keywords:

Condition survey, building inspection, CSP 1 Matrix, CIS 7, 2006, QLASSIC, building defects in Malaysia

Abstract

This study determines the types of defects often detected in residential buildings based on the criteria set by the Construction Industry Standard (CIS) 7: 2006–Quality Assessment System for Building Construction Work. Twenty-two terraced two-story houses located in Selangor, Malaysia were visually inspected and assessed in terms of building condition, and results were reported based on the Condition Survey Protocol 1 Matrix. Assessment findings were consolidated with those of defective groups based on the criteria of CIS 7: 2006 to determine the defect type, building component, and construction field in which defects often occur. Results show that most of the inspected houses are dilapidated even though they were recently completed. The most severe building defects are detected in the architecture. Furthermore, floors and walls are major contributors to building defects. Mainly as a result of poor workmanship, the most common defects involve finishing, alignment and evenness, and joint and gap. Thus, this study proposes a method to ensure high-quality workmanship.  

References

Ali, A. S. & Wen, K. H. 2011. Building Defects: Possible Solution for Poor Construction Workmanship. Journal of Building Performance. 2(1): 59–69.

Zamharira Sulaiman, Azlan Shah Ali, Faizah Ahmad. 2012. Abandoned Housing Project: Assessment on Resident Satisfaction toward Building Quality. Open House International. 37(2): 72–80.

Jamilus Hussein, Zuhairi Abdul Hamid and Mohd. Khairolden Ghani. 2009. Sustainable Construction within the Built Environment: Malaysian Construction Industry Initiatives. The 11th International Surveyors’ Congress, Crowne Plaza Mutiara Hotel, Kuala Lumpur. 18-19 June 2009, Plenary Session III – Paper 11.

R. Solis-Carcano, & C. Arcudia-Abad. 2013. Construction-Related Accidents in the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 27(2): 155–162.

CIDB. 2006. Construction Industry Standard; CIS 7: 2006. Quality Assessment System for Building Construction Work, Construction Industry Development Board Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

N. A. M Radzuan, W. S. Z. W. Hamdan, M. Y. Hamid & A. H. Abdullah-Halim. 2011. The Importance of Building Condition Survey Report for New House Buyers. Procedia Engineering. 20: 147–153.

H. Abdul-Rahman, C. Wang, L. Wood, & Y. Khoo. 2014. Defects in Affordable Housing Projects in Klang Valley, Malaysia. J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 28(2): 272–285.

N. Forcada, M. Macarulla, M. Gangolells, M. Casals, A. Fuertes & X. Roca. 2013. Posthandover Housing Defects: Sources and Origins. J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 27(6): 756–762.

N. Ahzahar, N.A. Karim, S.H. Hassan & J. Eman. 2011. A Study of Contribution Factors to Building Failures and Defects in Construction Industry. Procedia Engineering. 20: 249–255.

H. Ahmad, M. Y. Fadlie, N. A. Yahaya & J. Abu. 2011. The Means of Escaping for Occupants for Renovation Works of Terrace Houses in Malaysia. Procedia Engineering. 20: 188–192.

Nurizan Yahaya. 1998. Kualiti Perumahan dan Kualiti Hidup. Analisis. 5(1&2): 133–149.

N. Idrus & C.S. Ho. 2008. Affordable and Quality Housing through the Low Cost Housing provision in Malaysia. Proceedings of Seminar of Sustainable Development and Governance, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia 26 June 2008. 1–21.

P. E. Josephon & Y. Hammarlund. 1999. The Causes and Costs of Defects in Construction: A Study of Seven Building Projects. Automation in Construction. 8: 681–687.

P. Love, R. Lopez, J. Kim, & M. Kim. 2014. Influence of Organizational and Project Practices on Design Error Costs. J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 28(2): 303–310.

A. H. Hashim. 2003. Residential Satisfaction and Social Integration in Public Low Cost Housing in Malaysia. Journal of Social Science & Humanities. 11(1): 1–10.

H. N. Husin, A. H. Nawawi, F. Ismail. & N. Khalil. 2011. Development of Hierarchy for Safety Elements and Its Attributes for Malaysia’s Low Cost Housing. Procedia Engineering. 20: 71–79.

Mohd Zaki Mokhtar. 2006. Kerosakan dan Kemerosotan Struktur Konkrit di Malaysia. Dissertation. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai.

A. Ramly. 2004. Panduan Kerja-kerja Pemeriksaan Kecacatan Bangunan. Building & Urban Development Institute (BUDI). Malaysia: Hizi Print Sdn. Bhd.

D. C. C. K. Kowaltowski, V. G. Silva, S. A. M. G. Pina, L. C. R. Labaki, C. Ruschel & D. C. Moreira 2006. Quality of Life and Sustainability Issues as Seen by the Population of Low-income Housing in the Region of Campinas, Brazil. Habitat International. 30: 1100–1114.

Y. Yau. 2006. The Safety Performance of Apartment Buildings: Empirical Evidence from Hong Kong. PhD Unpublished Dissertation, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

D. P. Varady & M. A. Carrozza. 2000. Towards a Better Way to Measure Customer Satisfaction Levels in Public Housing: A Report from Cincinnati. Housing Studies. 15(6): 797–825.

W. F. E. Preiser, H. Z. Rabinowits & E. T. White. 1988. Post Occupancy Evaluation. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company CRS Sirrine Houston, TX.

M. Abdul Mohit, M. Ibrahim & Y.R. Rashid. 2010. Assessment of Residential Satisfaction in Newly Designed Public Lowcost Housing in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Habitat International. 34: 18–27.

JKR. 2009. Condition Assessment and Asset Performance. Kuala Lumpur: PWD.

C. Au-Yong, A. Ali & F. Ahmad. 2014. Significant Characteristics of Scheduled and Condition-Based Maintenance in Office Buildings. J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 28(2): 257–263.

N. Tirpude, K. Jain & B. Bhattacharjee. 2014. Decision Model for Repair Prioritization of Reinforced-Concrete Structures. J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 28(2): 250–256.

N. A. A. A. Salim & N. F. Zahari. 2011. Developing Integrated Building Indicator System (IBIS) (A Method of Formulating the Building Condition Rating). Procedia Engineering. 20: 256–261.

A. Straub. 2009. Dutch Standard for Condition Assessment of Building. Structural Survey. 27(1): 23–35.

Yong Kum Weng. 2013. Architect’s Certification: A Problem? Asia Pacific Network for Housing Research 2013. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 20-22 August 2013.

Ahmad Rashidi Mohd Nasir. 2013. Penilaian Prestasi Bangunan: Analisis Ruang Tandas Bangunan Institusi Pengajian Tinggi. Disertasi Sarjana, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi.

S. Lavy. 2008. Facility Management Practices in Higher Education Buildings. A Case Study. Journal of Facilities Management. 6(4): 303–315.

Briffet, C. 1995. Building Maintenance Technology in Tropical Climate. Singapore: University Press.

Nik Elyna Myeda, Syahrul Nizam Kamaruzzaman & M. Pitt. 2011. Measuring the Performance of Office Buildings Maintenance Management in Malaysia. Journal of Facilities Management. 9(3): 181–199.

Wai-Kiong Chong and Sui-Pheng Low. 2005. Assessment of Defects at Construction and Occupancy Stages. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities. 19(4): 283-289.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2005)19:4(283).

Downloads

Published

2014-08-27

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

Building Condition Assessment for New Houses: A Case Study in Terrace Houses. (2014). Jurnal Teknologi, 70(1). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v70.2812