GENERALIZATION OF MATHEMATICAL REPRESENTATION FOR TOOL PATH BASED ON BOUNDARY REPRESENTATION (BREPS) DATA STRUCTURE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.2850Keywords:
Hermite curve, machining, tool pathAbstract
A generic representation of linear and curvilinear entities with embedded motion attributes is possible via the integration of a Hermite curve and dynamic of motion. A Hermite curve will form the curve, while a dynamic of motion will position the vertices on the curves with the introduction of a delta distance (Δs). A three-phase algorithm is introduced to examine the applicability of generic representation in tool-path generation. The preprocessing stage will examine the input model prior to Phase I. Phase I will extract the BReps data, and these BReps data will be used in Phase II to develop the generalized mathematical representation of the tool path. Finally, the tool path is drawn in Phase III.
References
Gindy, N. N. Z. 1989. A Hierarchical Structure for Form Features. International Journal of Production Research. 27(12): 2089-2103.
Patil, L. and S. S. Pande. 2002. An Intelligent Feature-Based Process Planning System for Prismatic Parts. International Journal of Production Research. 40(17): 4431-4447.
Woo, Y., E. Wang, Y. S. Kim, and H. M. Rho. 2005. A Hybrid Feature Recognizer for Machining Process Planning Systems. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology. 54(1): 397-400.
Hou, M. and T. N. Faddis. 2006. Automatic Tool Path Generation of a Feature-Based CAD/CAPP/CAM Integrated System. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing. 19(4): 350-358.
Lee, H. C., W. C. Jhee, and H. S. Park. 2007. Generative CAPP through Projective Feature Recognition. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 53(2): 241-246.
Khoshnevis, B., D. N. Sormaz, and J. Y. Park. 1999. An Integrated Process Planning System Using Feature Reasoning and Space Search-Based Optimization. IIE Transactions. 31(7): 597-616.
Xu, X., L. Wang, and S. T. Newman. 2011. Computer-Aided Process Planning–A Critical Review of Recent Developments and Future Trends. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing. 24(1): 1-31.
Sormaz, D.N. and C. Tennety. 2010. Recognition of Interacting Volumetric Features Using 2D Hints. Assembly Automation. 30(2): 131-141
Zheng, Y., J. Mohd Taib, and M. Md Tap. 2012. Decomposition of Interacting Machining Features Based on the Reasoning on the Design Features. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 58(1): 359-377.
Deja M., and M. S. Siemiatkowski. 2013. Feature-Based Generation of Machining Process Plans for Optimised Parts Manufacture. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. 24(4): 831-846.
Chen H., and X. Du. 2014. Integrated Process Planning Method for 3D Designing Environment. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 496-500: 2316-2319.
Yin, Z. and S. Jiang. 2003. Automatic Segmentation and Approximation of Digitized Data for Reverse Engineering. International Journal of Production Research. 41(13): 3045-3058.
Chui, K. L., K. M. Yu, and T. C. Lee. 2002. Direct Tool-Path Generation from Massive Point Input. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture. 216: 199-206.
Tapie L, B. Mawussi, and A. Bernard. 2012. Topological Model for Machining of Parts with Complex Shapes. Computers in Industry. 63(5): 528-541.
Makhanov S. S. 2010. Adaptable Geometric Patterns for Five-Axis Machining: A Survey. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 47(9): 1167-1208.
Fouladinejad, N. 2011. Intelligent Traffic Flow Simulation System on a Small Scale Environment. M. Eng Thesis. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright of articles that appear in Jurnal Teknologi belongs exclusively to Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Penerbit UTM Press). This copyright covers the rights to reproduce the article, including reprints, electronic reproductions, or any other reproductions of similar nature.
