Extraction and Characterization of Cellulose from Empty Fruit Bunch (EFB) Fiber

Authors

  • Norzita Ngadi Department of Chemical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Nurul Saadiah Lani Department of Chemical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v68.3028

Keywords:

Empty fruit bunch fiber, cellulose, polymer, ionic liquid, alkaline treatment

Abstract

In recent years, the use of cellulose fibers in many fields has attracted significant scientific attention due to consumer and environmentally benign, especially in plastic industry, which has been used as cost–cutting fillers and hence provides the possibility of reinforcing polymers. Cellulose can be extracted from natural fibers by chemical and mechanical methods. However, the existing procedures either produce low yields and not environment friendly or energy efficient. The objective of this study was to develop a novel process that uses ionic liquid followed by alkaline method to extract cellulose from empty fruit bunch (EFB) fiber. Subsequently, the properties of original fiber and cellulose were determined by Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy, X–Ray Diffraction (XRD) and thermogravimetric (TG) analysis. The results of the chemical compositions revealed that the modified alkaline treatment was able to remove a large fraction of lignin and hemicelluloses compared to unmodified alkaline treatment. Thus, this process represents an efficient treatment in extracting cellulose of highest yield. 

References

Hariharan, A. B. A. and H. P. S. Abdul–Khalil. 2005. Lignocellulose Based Hybrid Bi–Layer Laminate Composites: Part 1–Studies on Tensile and Impact Behavior of Oil Palm Fiber/Glass Fiber Reinforced Epoxy. Journal of Composite Materials. 39(8): 663–684.

Satyanarayana, K. G., G. G. C. Arizaga and F. Wypych. 2009. Biodegradable Composites Based on Lignocellulosic Fibers: An Overview. Progress in Polymer Science. 34(9): 982–1021B.

Chawla, K. K. 1998. Fibrous materials. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Kadla, J. F. and R. D. Gilbert. 2000. Cellulose Structure: A Review. Cellulose Chemistry and Technology. 34(3–4): 197–216.

Moran, J. I., V. A. Alvarez, V. P. Cyras and A. Vazquez. 2008. Extraction of Cellulose & Preparation of Nanocellulose from Sisal Fibers. Cellulose, 15(1): 149–159.

Cherian, B. M., A. L. Leao, S. F. de-Souza, L. M. M. Costa, G. de-Olyveira, M. Kottaisamy, E.R. Nagarajan and S. Thomas. 2011. Cellulose Nanocomposites with Nanoï¬bres Isolated from Pineapple Leaf Fibers for Medical Applications, Carbohydrate Polymers. 86(4): 1790–1798.

Khalil, H. P. S. A., H. Ismail, H. D. Rozman and M. N. Ahmad. 2001. The Effect of Acetylation on Interfacial Shear Strength Between Plant Fibres and Various Matrices. European Polymer Journal. 37(5): 1037–1045.

Troedec, M., D. Sedan, C. Peyratout, J.P. Bonnet, A. Smith, R. Guinebretiere, V. Gloaguen and P. Krausz. 2008. Influence of Various Chemical Treatments on the Composition and Structure of Hemp Fibres. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing. 39(3): 514–522.

Nacos, M. K., P. Katapodis, C. Pappas, D. Daferera, P.A. Tarantilis, P. Christakopoulos and M. Polissiou. 2006. Kenaf xylan–A Source of Biologically Active Acidic Oligosaccharides. Carbohydrate Polymers. 66(1): 126–134.

Mandal, A. and D. Chakrabarty. 2011. Isolation of Nanocellulose from Waste Sugarcane Bagasse (SCB) and Its Characterization. Carbohydrate Polymers. 86(3): 1291–1299.

Yang, H., R. Yan, H. Chen, H., Lee, D. H. and C. Zheng. 2007. Characteristics of Hemicellulose, Cellulose and Lignin Pyrolysis. Fuel. 86(12–13): 1781–1788.

Alemdar, A. and M. Sain. 2007. Isolation and Characterization of Nanofibers from Agricultural Residues–Wheat Straw and Soy Hulls. Bioresources Technology. 99(6): 1664–1671.

Jonoobi, M., A. Khazaeian, P.M. Tahir, S.S. Azry and K. Oksman. 2011. Characteristics of Cellulose Nanofibers Isolated from Rubberwood and Empty Fruit Bunches of Oil Palm Using Chemo–mechanical Process. Cellulose. 18(4): 1085–1095.

Abraham, E., B. Deepa, L. A. Pothan, M. Jacob, S. Thomas, U. Cvelbar and R. Anandjiwala. 2011. Extraction of Nanocellulose Fibrils from Lignocellulosic Fibers: A Novel Approach. Carbohydrate Polymers. 86(4): 1468–1475.

Fahma, F., S. Iwamoto, N. Hori, T. Iwata and A. Takemura. 2010. Isolation, Preparation, and Characterization of Nanofibers from Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch (OPEFB). Cellulose. 17(5): 977–985.

Bhatnagar, A. and M. Sain. 2005. Processing of Cellulose Nanofiber–Reinforced Composites. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites. 24(12): 1259–1268.

Klemm, D., B. Heublein, H.P. Fink and A. Bohn. 2005. Cellulose: Fascinating Biopolymer and Sustainable Raw Material. Angewandte Chemie-International Edition. 44(22): 3358–3393.

John, M. J. and R. D. Anandjiwala. 2007. Recent Developments in Chemical Modification and Characterization of Natural Fiber–reinforced Composites. Polymer Composites. 29(2): 187–207.

Lee, H. L., G. C. Chen and R. M. Rowell. 2004. Thermal Properties of Wood Reacted with a Phosphorus Pentoxide–amine System. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 91(4): 2465–2481.

Yang, S. H., Y. S. J. Lee, F. H. Lin, J. M. Yang and K. S. Chen. 2007. Chitosan/Poly(vinyl alcohol) Blending Hydrogel Coating Improves the Surface Characteristics of Segmented Polyurethane Urethral Catheters, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials. 83B(2): 304–313.

Downloads

Published

2014-05-27

How to Cite

Extraction and Characterization of Cellulose from Empty Fruit Bunch (EFB) Fiber. (2014). Jurnal Teknologi, 68(5). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v68.3028