Minimum Input Variances for Modelling Rainfall-runoff Using ANN

Authors

  • Zulkarnain Hassan School of Environmental Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, 02600 Arau, Perlis, Malaysia
  • Supiah Shamsudin School of Environmental Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, 02600 Arau, Perlis, Malaysia
  • Sobri Harun Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v69.3154

Keywords:

Artificial neural network, runoff, IHACRES, rainfall-runoff

Abstract

This paper presents the study of possible input variances for modeling the long-term runoff series using artificial neural network (ANN). ANN has the ability to derive the relationship between the inputs and outputs of a process without the physics being provided to it, and it is believed to be more flexible to be used compared to the conceptual models [1]. Data series from the Kurau River sub-catchment was applied to build the ANN networks and the model was calibrated using the input of rainfall, antecedent rainfall, temperature, antecedent temperature and antecedent runoff. In addition, the results were compared with the conceptual model, named IHACRES. The study reveal that ANN and IHACRES can simulate well for mean runoff but ANN gives a remarkable performance compared to IHACRES, if the model customizes with a good configuration.  

References

Nor, N., S. Harun, and A. Kassim. 2007. Radial Basis Function Modeling of Hourly Streamflow Hydrograph. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering. 12(1): 113–123.

Bloschl, G. 2005. Rainfall–Runoff Modeling of Ungauged Catchments. London: John Wiley and Sons.

Zhang, G. P., and H. H. G. Savenije. 2005. Rainfall-Runoff Modelling in a Catchment with a Complex Groundwater Fow System: Application of the Representative Elementary Watershed (REW) approach. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. 9: 243–261.

Guéro, P. 2006. Rainfall Analysis and Flood Hydrograph Determination in the Munster Blackwater Catchment. University College Cork, Ireland.

Rezaeianzadeh, M., A. Stein, H. Tabari, H. Abghari, N. Jalalkamali, E. Z. Hosseinipour, and V. P. Singh. 2013. Assessment of a Conceptual Hydrological Model and Artificial Neural Networks for Daily Outflows Forecasting. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 10(6): 1181–1192.

Beven, K. 1989. Changing Ideas in Hydrology - The Case of Physically-Based Models. Journal of Hydrology. 105(1–2): 157–172.

Vos, N. J., and T. H. M. Rientjes. 2005. Constraints of Artificial Neural Networks for Rainfall-Runoff Modelling: Trade-Offs in Hydrological State Representation and Model Evaluation. Hydrology and Earth System Science Discussions. 2: 365–415.

ASCE Task Committee on Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology. 2000. Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology. I: Preliminary Concepts. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering. 5(2): 115–123.

Hsu, K. L., H. V. Gupta, and S. Sorooshian. 1995. Artificial Neural Network Modelling of the Rainfall-Runoff Process. Water Resources Research. 31(10): 2517–2530.

Minns, A. W., and M. J. Hall. 1996. Artificial Neural Networks as Rainfall Runoff Models. Hydrological Science Journal. 41(3): 399–417.

Dawson, C. W., and R. L. Wilby. 2001. Hydrological Modelling Using Artificial Neural Networks. Progress in Physical Geography. 25(1): 80–108.

Tokar, A. S., and P. A. Johnson. 1999. Rainfall-Runoff Modeling Using Artificial Neural Networks. Journal of Hydrological Engineering. 4(3): 232–239.

Rajurkar, M. P., U. C. Kothyari, and U. C. Chaube. 2002. Artificial Neural Networks for Daily Rainfall-Runoff Modelling. Hydrological Sciences Journal. 47(6): 865–877.

Wilby, R. L., R. J. Abrahart, and C. W. Dawson. 2003. Detection of Conceptual Model Rainfall-Runoff Processes Inside an Artificial Neural Network. Hydrological Sciences Journal. 48(2): 163–181.

French, M. N., W. F. Krajewski and R. R. Cuykendall. 1992. Rainfall Forecasting in Space and Time Using a Neural Network. Journal of Hydrology. 137(1–4): 1–31.

Gautama, M. R., K. Watanabea, and H. Saegusa. 2000. Runoff Analysis in Humid Forest Catchment with Artificial Neural Network. Journal of Hydrology. 235(1–2): 117–136.

Hassan, Z. 2012. Climate Change Impact on Precipitation on Precipitation and Streamflow in a Humid Human Tropical Watershed. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia.

Ye, W., B. C. Bates, N. R. Viney, M. Sivapalan, and A. J. Jakeman. 1997. Performance of Conceptual Rainfall-Runoff Models in Low-Yielding Ephemeral Catchments. Water Resources Research. 33(1): 153–166.

Littlewood, I. G., K. Down, J. R. Parker, and D. A. Post. 1997. IHACRES: Catchment-Scale Rainfall-Streamflow Modelling (PC version) Version 1.0. Wallingford : Institute of Hydrology, Centre for Ecology and Hydrology.

Zadeh, M. R., S. Amin, D. Khalili, and V. P. Singh. 2010. Daily Outflow Prediction by Multi Layer Perceptron with Logistic Sigmoid and Tangent Sigmoid Activation Functions. Water Resources Management. 24 (11): 2673–2688.

Kuok, K. K., and N. Bessaih. 2007. Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) for Daily Rainfall Runoff Modelling, Journal - The Institution of Engineers. 68(3): 31–42.

Downloads

Published

2014-06-20

How to Cite

Minimum Input Variances for Modelling Rainfall-runoff Using ANN. (2014). Jurnal Teknologi, 69(3). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v69.3154