SELECTING THE BEST COMPOSTING TECHNOLOGY USING ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP)

Authors

  • Najah Sofia Md Zaini Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering & Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Noor Ezlin Ahmad Basri Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering & Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Shahrom Md Zain Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering & Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Nur Fatin Mat Saad Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering & Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v77.3180

Keywords:

Analytic Hierarchy Process, composting technology, organic waste

Abstract

The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) has been used widely to solve multi-criteria selection problem. It is a technique that allows the decision makers to set their priorities and help make the best selection when both tangible and intangible aspects need to be considered. This study uses the AHP to select the best composting technology for the UKM composting centre where the accumulation of organic wastes are generated daily from the cafeteria and landscape activities within the UKM campus. Experts who are familiar and who have some years of experience on solid waste management at UKM were interviewed to do the pair wise comparisons which are structured with four criteria namely environmental, economy, social and technical aspects. These criteria then expanded into a few more sub-criteria. The alternatives for the composting technology are windrow composting and in-vessel composting. The analysis is done using the Super Decisions software. The result shows that technical factor is the most important factor with (0.5000), followed by environmental (0.2517), economy (0.1941) and social (0.0542) factors. The end result shows that windrow composting is the best composting technology according to these four factors with the priority of 0.6236 while composting in—vessel has the priority of 0.3765.

References

Filipović, M. 2007. The Analytic Hierarchy Process as a Support for Decision Making. SPATIUM. 44-59.

Baby, S. 2013. AHP Modelling for Multicriteria Decision-Making and to Optimise Strategies for Protecting Coastal Landscape Resource. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology. 4(2): 218-227.

Mohd Armi Abu Samah, Latifah Abdul Manaf, N. I. M. Zuki 2010. Application of AHP Model for Evaluation of Solid Waste Treatment Technology. International Journal of Engineering Techsci.

Triantaphyllou, E. and S. H. Mann. 1995. Using the Analytica Hierarchy Process for Decision Making In Engineering Applicaiton: Some Challenges. International Journal of Industrial Engineering: Application and Practice (2). 35-44.

Saaty, T.L. 2005. Making and Validating Complex Decisions with the AHP/ANP. Journal of systems Science and System Engineering. 14: 1- 36.

Tiew, K. G. Kruppa S., Noor Ezlin Ahmad Basri, Hassan Basri. 2010. Municipal Solid Waste Composition Study at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Campus. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences. 6380-6389.

Zarina Shahudin, Shahrom Md Zain, Noor Ezlin Ahamd Basri, Najah Sofia Md Zaini, Nur Fatin Mat Saad, Hassan Basri. 2013. Preliminary Study for Designing a Yard Waste Composting Facility in Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Jurnal Teknologi. 97-103.

Zarina Shahudin. 2012 Aplikasi Percubaan Kaedah Pengkomposan Dalam Pengurusan Sisa Makanan di Kafeteria UKM. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Najah Sofia Md Zaini, Noor Ezlin Ahmad Basri, Shahrom Md Zain, Nurul Huda Mohamad, Nurul Nadiah Ishak, Zarina Shahudin. 2012. On-Site Rotary Drum Composting Process Of Cafeteria Food Waste At Ukm. International Technical Conference.

Nur Fatin Mat Saad, Noor Ezlin Ahmad Basri, Shahrom Md Zain, Nurqaidah Nadrah Ma'min. 2012. Composting Of Mixed Yard And Food Wastes With Effective Microbes. International Technical Conference.

Osman, K., N. BojÄetić, and D. Marjanović. 2010. Multi Criteria Decision Making In Product Platform Development And Evaluation. International Design Conference. Dubrovnik- Croatia, May.

Nasruddin Hassan, Norfaieqah Ahmad, Wan Malissa Wan Aminuddin. 2013. Selection of Mobile Network Operator Using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences. 7(1): 1-5.

Saaty, T.L. 2008. Decision Making With the Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Journal of Services Sciences. 1(1). 83 - 97.

Noor Suraya Romali, Nadiah Mokhtar, Wan Faizal Wan Ishak, Mohd Armi Abu Samah. 2013. Solid Waste Managmenet: Development of AHP Model for Application of Landfill Sites Selection in Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia. International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process.

Korner, I. and C. Visvanathan. 2007. Composting and Digestion - A Comparison Between Europe and Asia. Eleventh International Waste Management and Landfill Symposium. S. Margherita di Pula, Cagliari, Italy.

Downloads

Published

2015-10-20

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

SELECTING THE BEST COMPOSTING TECHNOLOGY USING ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP). (2015). Jurnal Teknologi, 77(1). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v77.3180